Do you consider Gilgamesh good, evil or neutral?

Do you consider Gilgamesh good, evil or neutral?

>That visual QUALITY
Ok, who called Studio DEEN?

Kirei's wife

Isn't he chaotic good?

Good

Yes since hes thinking of whats best for humanity

He's Chaotic Good in everything but UBW.

Which FGO servants can beat Gil?

Gil is always good because he truly believe he does good. Like paladins in DnD that could slaughter entire villages or torture innocents and still keep their paladin class and good alignment just fine.

oh, yeah. that's something awesome and fucked up about DnD.
there can be always a paladin that burns entire villages and kill the innocent without any trace of remorse because he believes that his vile actions (yes, they can even aknowledge the evil of their own actions) are justified in the name of the greater good.

On another note how the hell is he qualified for the berserker class? Would he have a different set of abilities/ fighting style?

In the original epic he's neutral.
In Fate he's evil.
But in all his incarnations, Gilgamesh is a dick.

What does that shit even mean in Fate? Regardless he's a dick.

Which one to kill to get the saint quartz fragments weekly

He is most definitely Neutral Evil.

Nasu doesn't understand D&D alignments and probably put these labels on him without knowing what they are about.

There is no "greater good" alignment in D&D.

If you do evil actions, you're not a Paladin anymore. The only exceptions are if you were deluded or under duress in which case you can atone.

Gil is CN because when he acts, he does so for his own entertainment more than for any higher cause or ethos.

>he truly believe he does good
Things don't work like that in D&D because the system has absolute morality. What you believe is besides the point.

Gilgamesh would be Evil in D&D just like the Paladin that slaughters villages and tortures innocents because those are evil acts - even if done in the name of good. The ends justify the means is "possibly" still Chaotic Good depending on what you're doing but it's more likely than not plain evil.

He is heavily motivated by his own selfishness, wanting to posses, etc. making him more Neutral Evil than Chaotic Neutral.

Saying "he truly believes he's doing good" doesn't mean much when the guy is an unabashed egoist.

Gilgamesh would be Good in D&D because of his Divinity.

How is alignment tied to divinity? There are plenty of evil deities out there.

I consider him True Best.

He did nothing in heavens feel part 1

Just shut the fuck up already. Caster Gil already said Archer Gil is bad. Even Kid Gil says Archer Gil is bad.

Any Lancer.

He doesn't do anything in heavens feel

>If you do evil actions, you're not a Paladin anymore

Doesnt work like that secondary. There is a paladin order who truly believes and teaches the adepts that magic is evil and mages should be killed. So they run around and kill mages and stay paladins.

Wow that's lame

Gil was a dick, so evil, never read his actual legend so couldn’t s ay anything about that