Was she right?
Was she right?
Brandon Jackson
Jack Reyes
NO. FUN THINGS ARE NOT FUN WHEN YOU ARE DEPRESSED.
Anthony Perez
>you will never conceive a child with Yuis squishy body
Owen Nelson
Yes.
Colton Martinez
Leo Morales
How to fun
Jordan Morales
>breeding with an autistic girl
new fetish obtained
Gavin Diaz
I agree. Yui is for fun.
Nathan Hughes
she's right you know, words to live by
Justin Cox
Camden Davis
>buzzwords
No
Chase Watson
Yui is cute! CUTE!
Jaxon Mitchell
Absolutely!
Levi Williams
No, she wasn't.
Jose Hall
"Fun things are fun" contains no buzzwords, though.
Elijah Watson
>HURRR HURRR HURRR
simple and poignant
>Example of an analytic apriori proposition and an affirmative subject-predicate judgment whose the predicate concept is contained with the subject concept
pretentious autism
Andrew Gray
Jonathan Gutierrez
want a hug, user?
Landon Smith
It does if you're a Sup Forumstard or trying to ironically be one.
Caleb Robinson
Rape is rape
Ethan Ramirez
Yui changed a lot after she went to college
Jason Martinez
If that were true, why don't I enjoy them anymore?
Bentley Perry
Le debression :(
John Nelson
Don't use emoticons on Sup Forums.
Ethan Rivera
Kys
Noah Mitchell
>saying "kys"
Not him, but you should probably follow your own advice.
Jason Carter
I had fun once.
Never again.
Landon Edwards
Rood :(((((
Jose Cox
What happened?
Jose Martinez
it doesn't work like that as one "fun" is a noun but the other is a adjective, and plurals don't really exist in Japanese.
Oliver Reyes
Life
Samuel Evans
Of course she's right. Yui can do no wrong
Nathaniel Russell
Were they right?
Kayden Wright
When did you grow out of your Yui phase, Sup Forums?
Xavier Ward
No. See: Dogs.
Jose Lee
Dogs die though.
Joshua Murphy
Quick stop feeding your dog dog food!
Jose Murphy
Don't kill dogs please.
Thomas Brown
She's fun when having sex!
Thomas Moore
Isn't it past your bed-time, Ui?
Carson Anderson
No!
Nolan Campbell
>implying such a thing is possible
Brody Ramirez
Is Yui ever wrong?
Cooper Scott
Run-chan has a pretty forehead.
Logan Turner
Isaac Hughes
She did nothing wrong.
Colton Wood
Dogs die if they are killed.
Alexander Allen
it doesn't happen, if you think you did you are just coping
Josiah Johnson
But don't worry, all dogs go to heaven.
Blake Martinez
Yes
Jace Jackson
Delete
Nathaniel Lopez
People die when they are killed.
Angel Baker
No see, you're correct, dogs die quicker if they aren't fed, but it's also technically true that dogs die if they eat dog food.
This is because dogs aren't immortal, so they always die.
A statement of the form:
A => B will always be correct, if B is always true.
Therefore:
Dogs eat dog food. => Dogs die
Colton Smith
We breathe oxygen but still die, so is oxygen actually poisonous?
Logan Diaz
Jayden Flores
That's not how it works.
"You do X => You die" is different from
"You did X ^(And) you Died => X killed you"
Consult pic related.
The right hand of "=>" always being true, is the reverse of the left hand always being wrong, and it's a well established rule in Logic, that any statement you make regarding an "if" where the actual condition is never fulfilled, is true. Such as: "Every single Unicorn is purple and knows how to play the panflute." There are no non-purple unicorns, nor unicorns that don't know how to play a panflute. Sure, there also aren't any unicorns that can do these things, but the lack of an example does not disprove a general statement, only the presence of a counter example.
Because of this, "All Unicorns either can't play the flute, aren't purple or neither." is also a correct statement, even though it's the opposite of the other statement.
Similarily, because you can't show a single scenario, in which a dog did eat dog food, and yet never died/will die, "Dogs that eat dog food die." is still true.
It's sort of a correlation =/= Causation kind of deal.
Cameron Harris
This is a cute thread.
Samuel Perez
If is conditional. As such dogs die if they eat dog food is tuatalogical because the presumed conditions under which a dog dies after eating are unrelated to the action of eating. As such while the statement is true causally (that a dog will die after eating dog food) the argument is nul. Effective truncation is 'Dogs die'. Which means the statement is false because it did not technically convey its meaning effectively.
Carson Morgan
She was wrong to ditch Nodoka on graduation day.
Nathan Brown
Nodoka never existed - she was Yui's imaginary friend in her head