Zelda NX Leak

It's going to be like a Souls game.

Other urls found in this thread:

m.youtube.com/watch?v=6cTfUca9voQ
twitter.com/AnonBabble

Dark Souls > All Zelda games

...

>Z-target combat

Mite be cool

They're different kinds of games.
I don't really like Dark Souls personally though. Movement in it feels slow and weighty, and combat doesn't have enough precision.

neogaf exclusive

A mature rated Zelda game would be awesome

No, they arent
Get gud scrub

Zelda U is gonna suck ass

>implying zelda the retard would ever wear a helmet

Dark Souls is far closer to the original Zelda in design than LttP was.

This damn it

You mean its going to TRY to be like a souls game.
This desu

Neat

So you're going to roll around with long lasting iframes until the boss leaves an opening and then hit him?
Rinse and repeat until he's dead on every boss.

Pretty much Zelda 1 and Zelda 2 were what a 2D dark souls game would be like.

It's just sad they shifted from a dungeon crawling game into the puzzlefest that it is today. At least we have the souls series to carry on the spirit of the original Zelda.

i kind of like the puzzlefest honestly, the combat in both games wasnt nearly engaging enough to be a true dungeon crawler (not that its terrible necessarily).

I honestly feel a puzzle-souls game is completely doable and Zelda would be the best guinea pig available to give it a shot in.

You bring the series back closer to its roots with needing to git gud for enemy laden dungeons with challenging bosses. Keep the world full of secrets like the original Zelda and current Dark Souls, and throw some Myst-lite style puzzles into the dungeons and overworld for progress/bonus content.

>Souls players say the most retarded shit about Zelda games
>Zelda players say the most retarded shit about Souls games

I don't understand why such a stupid comparison is made in the first place.

>Soulfags this delusional
Looks nothing like a Souls game

Source

...

>They're different kinds of games.
Ironic, seeing as Souls is closer to traditional Legend of Zelda (first two games) than the garbage Nintendo puts out these days.

>thrown into world with minimal if any explanation
>no hand holding
>NPCs give only minor direction, and only if you choose to talk to them
>intended order to things but allows you to do many things out of order
>exploration plays a major part
>has an amount of challenge greater than zero
specifically in Zelda II:
>not a lot of health
>health refills limited/hard to come by outside of safe areas
>leveling and stats

m.youtube.com/watch?v=6cTfUca9voQ

I wish there were a button that I could push that would kill all people like you forever.

THE GAME YOU'RE LOOKING FOR IS CASTLEVANIA

CASTLE

VANIA

So this is the power....of the NX...

Dark Souls is Zelda without the adventure elements

The Zelda series could learn some lessons from the Souls series.

>HURR SOULS = ZELDA

I want this meme to die.

what went wrong?

this is what teenagers actually believe

>Zelda players say the most retarded shit about Souls games
wait really? like what?

but they're both open ended adventure games with swords

zelda needs to be more like souls because i like souls but hate zelda

also it should be developed by platinum and have a crowdfunding campaign and chris avellone should write the story

>Souls is more Zelda than Zelda meme
>everything should be Souls meme

Jesus fucking Christ you faggots are a joke.

>everything should be Souls
it's the only series to do pve combat correctly in it's genre

It's no meme. Souls is similar to what classic Legend of Zelda would look as a 3D game. Unless you're one of those people who think Zelda has always been about solving boring puzzles, and other shit plaguing the series today.

>what is Dragon's Dogma

Except its not and never will be. They want to pander to a large audience

>either circle around the enemy endlessly
>or roll around like your ass is on fire
>the goal is to backstab, always backstab

No.

Wrong. The Zelda games are about being on a grand adventure, the Souls games do not capture this feeling, do not provide a world filled with fantasy and wonder. The souls games are designed to feel oppressive and solitary while enforcing the "this is so difficult" meme, the posess nothing that draws people to Zelda.

Fucking this. If any game was close it was DD.

>>or roll around like your ass is on fire
>>the goal is to backstab, always backstab
play BB and DS3

oh wait, I'm asking a shitposter to play games

sorry

I would be totally down if nintendo hired from software gave them a huge budget and told them to make a souls like zelda game.

>The Zelda games are about being on a grand adventure,
They were about delving into dungeons. Overworld exploration played but only a part of the experience, and Souls still captures that.

I'm probably speaking with someone whose first Zelda was OoT.

>Dark Souls is the only series to to PVE right
>n-no not that, only recent entries!

Kek

I didn't say Dark Souls, I said the series.

Gain some reading comprehension, kiddo.

It didn't carry it for long considering From won't be making any more of those games.
Also Souls took just as much inspiration from Ocarina of Time and Majoras Mask.

JUST LIKE OOT

You're so close to realizing they're all varying degrees of adventure. Sometimes platforming is thrown in the mix. Zelda and DS are closer to pure adventures than Castlevania ever was.

What innovation would that even bring to the franchise? More violenter?

CASTLEVANIA

THAT'S THE OLDER GAME YOU SHOULD BE COMPARING SOULS TO

THE GAME WITH EXTREMELY DELIBERATE COMBAT MECHANICS, PLATFORMING, GOTHIC THEMES, ENEMY PLACEMENT, ETC WHERE THE ONLY THING BETWEEN YOU AND DEATH IS YOUR WHIP AND A SUBWEAPON IF YOU HAPPENED TO GRAB ONE

HELL THERE WAS EVEN A CRYPTIC SHITTY OPEN WORLD ONE IN THE FORM OF CASTLEVANIA 2

NOT ZELDA 1 AND 2 THE RELATIVELY FAST PACED ADVENTURE GAMES WHOSE DESIGN IS FUNDAMENTALLY BASED ON UNLOCKABLE UTILITY ITEMS AND LABYRINTHINE DUNGEON CRAWLING WITH KEYS, COMBAT ARENA, PUZZLES, ETC

PLEASE STOP HAVING WRONG OPINIONS

Just no user. Zelda is obsessed with exploration, Souls is obsessed with fighting "hard" enemies, it built an entire meme loving fanbase out of that. Zelda exploded with OoT, a game that is STILL being copied today, because it had perfect balance between everything. Souls is just concerned with "hard" enemies, everything else is secondary.

But user they can't use Castlevania because it's a superior series, they compare LoZ because it's easier.

>Dark Souls is like original Zelda
love this meme

>Zelda is obsessed with exploration,
confirmed for not having played beyond z64.
zelda hasn't been about exploration for a long time bruh. it's a rail melee fighter now.

Casuals don't know Castlevania.
>mfw I did a whip build with my Belmont on DaS1 because I knew it was similar and that Castlevania was deader than dead when they announced LoS

Holy shit I would play that

>dark souls
>castlevania

Of course, so that's why the heavy emphasis on paltforming is present in the Souls games. Gotcha.

It's a 2D sidescroller. There needs to be platforming or else you're literally just walking in a line.

Roosters are dumb assholes and overall bags of wind.

I'm not sure why you are using that to represent your position or authority in this discussion, it makes you look like a fuckwit.

If people really do like Nintendo games, why have sop few people attempted to clone them? It's not the NES and SNES days when Nintendo's games were actually unique, I'm sure you could give TOSE or another starving Jap developer like Platinum a ham sandwich and make a better Zelda game than Nintendo ever will.

Just play TP with Ganon amiibo on hero mode you fucking casual

Like how the Souls games are a difficulty simulator?

I'M A DUMB ASSHOLE FUCKWIT FOR EVEN ENGAGING IN THIS RETARDED MEME SO GO FUCK YOURSELF

>Of course my comparison of Dark Souls to a side scrolling adventure game doesn't work when you consider platforming!
Meanwhile, top down adventure games fit the Dark Souls bill perfectly because Dark Souls is a fucking adventure game.

What would that even mean? Link doesn't talk and I doubt there would be Zelda tits. There could be more violence but Link fights goofy monsters so it probably only be rated Teen at best.

>what is a 3rd person action adventure game with swords, magic, dungeons and bosses

were you dropped on your head as a child?

>Souls is similar to what classic Legend of Zelda would look as a 3D game.
Yes because Zelda is totally Roll and Press A to Win.

Fucking delusional Soulsfags.

You're right, Zelda just just press A to win.

is just*

>Link fights goofy monsters

Unless they're redesigned, of course. :3

Not if it just looks like dark souls
If they made it with a graphic novel aesthetic so it still looks like a cartoon but more adult and bloody then that might be interesting

>Start out alone in the world with nothing but your wits about you.
>Get your sword and man the fuck up, kid. We're going demon hunting.
>Progress through enemies all with unique behaviors. The game teaches you not to suck at the speed by which you press on.
>Get keys to unlock new dungeons and challenges.
>Bosses are not just a challenge to be overcome, they're the fucking reward for all the faggotry you just went through.
>Hidden shit potentially around every corner. Be sure to check those walls for hidden rooms!
>World designed so that no area is ever truly obsolete and sequence breaking is somewhat welcome and built in.

DS, Zelda, Metroidvania?

Adventure games. You God damned retarded faggots.

Classic legend of zelda.
Roll

You what mate? The nes games didnt have a roll fuction. 2 was quite hard as well.

Think Sen's Fortress and jumps to areas with items.