WW1 or 1243?

WW1 or 1243?

Other urls found in this thread:

twitter.com/Battlefield/status/728313338174779393
youtube.com/watch?v=IDqkEvKwI6M
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

all signs point to 2143

I meant 2143

>WW1
Who came up with this meme?

what signs? Hope you are wrong. All this Modern Warfare Cyberfuture shit is shit. I want some WW1 or WW2 action like in the good old days

>like in the good old days
Please point me to the popular WW1 shooters of the past. The only one that comes to mind is Verdun which is experimental at best

>good old days
>WW2

Confirmed underage who wasn't around when every FPS game for 10 years was WW2.

...

I miss the old Medal of Honor and COD games. Havent touched any recent FPS because of the cybershit.

I hope it's 2143. The Titan mode was the best in the series.
Only the babbies that never played battlefield 2142 think that the future setting is bad. They imagine some titanfall or call of duty jumppack shit, although 2142 was really nice and down to earth regarding future tecc.

Not him but I think WW2 setting that dominated the market from the late 90s to mid 00s is overestimated. It's been about the same number of years when modern/very near future dominates the market and while most of the people are probably getting tired of it, they mostly forgot the WW2 games (if they've ever encountered any). It's a great setting after all and I think we are ready bring some WW2 popularity again in popular shooters.

Stop trying to fit in user.

>WW2 CoD and past times

CoD 1
CoD 2
CoD 3
CoD World at War
CoD Black Ops 1

>Modern day CoD

CoD 4 MW
CoD MW 2
CoD MW 3
CoD Ghosts

>Futuristic CoD

CoD Advanced Warfare
CoD Black OPs 2
CoD Black Ops 3

>Sci-fi CoD

CoD Infinite War

In reality CoD has had a fairly good balance in the number of games per setting.

Autists will still autism though.

>WW2 Battlefield or past times

BF 1942
BF 1943
BF Vietnam

>Modern day Battlefield

BF2
BF Bad Company 1
BF Bad Company 2
BF3
BF4

>Sci-Fi Battlefield

BF 2142

There have been more modern day BF games than past settings but the balance of settings is still pretty good.

Again autists will still autism.

>is overestimated
No it isn't, source is me during that time. There were a few games like Delta Force that were set during the Gulf war but 90% of GPS games were WW2 with next to no modern day shooters.

There have been no decent shooters with a historic WW setting in the last couple of years, hence I miss them and dont want the futuristic/Sci-Fi shooters that have oversaturated the market with minimal innovation.
Don't know why the fuck you have to bring up autism in every second sentence but if that makes you feel better thats okay.

We NEED more Sci-Fi shooters

Battlefield 1952

>source is me during that time
Look, buddy, you may not believe this, but there are people beside you who are older than 18 years old. I'm not telling that WW2 games didn't dominate the market, they obviously did, but the market had so much more. During that time we saw the release of Unreal and UT games, Quakes, Half Life and expansions, stuff like that. Not counting more niche shit, like XIII, Delta Force games, Chrome games, Pariah, Serious Sam etc
WW2 was popular alright, but it's not like there were disproportionate amount of games in that setting. Disproportionate amount of popular games, yes, but not all FPS.

It's WW1 you retards

Every multiplayer shooter 10 years ago was ww2
I have had enough of that

You missed Big Red One for past times CoD faggot, otherwise you're right.

twitter.com/Battlefield/status/728313338174779393
they posted this yesterday and it looks like an apache heli

You're implying bringing back WW2 would invite any kind of innovation.

No user, it's just a change of dressing to make things seem fresh when you're just getting the same fucking game again.

>1243

Someday...

>hype your game as best looking game to date
>reveal it on a 1080p30fps 3000 bitrate stream

fucking tech illiterate morons

>Announcement stream goes dim
>A few moments of silence
>...
>It ain't me starts playing

thats the set where they show prev battlefield titles

Just stop, we had a period where everything was WW, we have dine modern day and now we are moving on to future.

And if you want innovation sci-fi is the way to go not WW2 where everything is limited and has all been done before.

Modern day and futuristic are more innovative than WW2 ever was. There is so much more that can be done with a futuristic sci-fi setting with much more variate and diversit.

Stop user, just stop. We have just as many FPS games that aren't modern shooters today the same as the ones you listed when everything was WW2.

HALO, Rage, Bulletstorm, Wolfenstien, Singularity and many others whilst the majority being modern day. After all you are complaining that every shooter is modern day even though these other fps games exist.

Yeah no, you have to be absolute retard that DICE or EA would allow that. Even Hardline was made because of increase in counter strike popularity as a setting, there's absolutely nothing that will back up the WW1 as a popular and viable setting now and I really doubt that EA wants to give out free money in order to kill yet another franchise.

so there's a live streaming service that allows for a higher bitrate?

Hidden and Dangerous 3 when?

Modern or future confirmed.

I can't wait for WW babies to get BTFO and all the buttrage shitposting to start.

It's WW1.

...

I hope DICE have taken the risk. Market analysts probably tell otherwise but my gut feeling is that a Battlefield set in a WW setting would absoutely BTFO CoD Infinite War

>WW1 confirmed you sci-fi. faggots

>ballon-like

That means like them not actually them.

2143 obviously

just look at the Final Stand DLC for BF4

they won't go for alt history because Battlefield has always been grounded in at least some sort of realism

people are too used to modern guns and shit through the progression of MoH, BF and CoD - they don't want to go back to bolt shooters and slow tanks and shit

WW2 era has been relegated to DLC/expansion tier, like Vietnam has

>After all you are complaining that every shooter is modern day even though these other fps games exist.
The fuck are you talking about. Do you have problems with reading comprehension? Out of arguments and decide to make shit up? I've never complained about modern shooters dominating the market, it's a fact. What I'm saying is that modern shooters are just as popular as WW2 back in the day. There's plenty of FPS games that came out since CoD4 decided to shift the game into more modern setting and that are not set in modern times, nobody is saying that they are not. But the idea that we don't need "yet another ww2 shooter" is stupid, we haven't had any big ones in a decade, with the exception of RO2 and Heroes and Generals, neither of which are on BF/CoD levels. I don't think consolekids even know about their existence. Don't bring multiplayer into this, your original post didn't say shit about it.

>I speak for everyone

All this Exo suit and humanoid mech implants is far worse. The last thing we need is another cod like game where people are running on walls and jumping 50 ft in the air. They just need to tap into some old wars. It doesn't even need to be WW2.

>dont want the futuristic/Sci-Fi shooters that have oversaturated the market with minimal innovation.

Near future and full out scifi are different.

There's barely any FPS's nowadys with actual sci fi, and haven't been for over a decade now. The newer halo games are pretty much the only one, and they aren't just the same shit over and over again

I just want Battlefield 1863, come on Dice, please

Yeah, he's talking about a Zepplin. So WW1

>he's talking about a Zepplin
Source your ass.

Good chance it'll be a BF featuring dinosaurs, considering all the dinosaur easter eggs in BF 3 and 4.

>people actually want a battlefield with no vehicles and

>barely any sci-fi
>Titan fall: mechs
>CoD AW: laser guns and Exo suits
>black ops 3: robotic implants with electric batons and robots that have mini guns for arms

so like BF 2000BC

I want BF Primal where we just throw rocks at each other.

Who wants to fight on different planets using new and unique weapons and vehicles when we can trow rocks at each other in the woods?

Keep beleiving in ballon spaceships faggot, while I will enjoy some nice trench warfare action this November

It's obviously a titan.

>hovers like a balloon airship
>moves at the same speed as a balloon airship

>Hide in a hole for 20 days
>Die from mustard gas
woooooow

What the hell is that background and skewed placeholder text? Where is this even suppose to appear?

>nice trench warfare
Yeah, I can just imagine how much fun that will be.

Battlefield has always been about large scale warfare on battlefields (hence the name) with vehicles and gadgets.

>balloon-like airship
>air ship

Please don't tell me I need to explain this any further? When would anyone in the future ever use an airship that was anything like a fucking balloon in modern combat. Why would the game be futuristic if they're aerial technology consisted of ballon-like airships.

People who complain about IW are not hating it "on principle" but because it's a new meme for normies, finally, after like 10 years. They don't understand what is wrong with new CoDs and CoD as a whole, but their gut feels that every new game is slightly worse in a way, so they think that the futuristic setting is at fault. It is not, but the fact that IW made the perfect CoD for most of the people in 2009. Since that time they have to make it somewhat different, but every time they fail, mostly because they make it different. But they cannot not make it different because then the biggest accusation of Call of Duty as a franchise as a "copy paste neverchanging game" will finally become a reality and the most milked franchise of all gaming history will crumble in a year or two. I'm sure people will shit their pants when MW2 remastered will be teased.

2143 but there will be a single player mission set in the 1st ww.

see

That isn't balloon-like, that is a balloon airship.

He said there will be balloon-like airships, not there will be balloon airships.

All which existed in WW1. Had you taken any history classes you would know that not every single front of the war consisted of Trench Warfare. Read rommels book on Infantry tactics and how he literally changed the game in the alps, may surprise.

That's a possibility and a pretty neat one

Leaked concept art

WW1:

> large scale battlefield
Check

>vehicles
Check

>Gadgets
check

It's not a balloon air ship you idiot. Zeppelins are in different classification than Drigbiles and Blimps. It's a Rigid Airship. It also used hydrogen rather than helium. These were balloon-like airships, not balloons themselves.

...

Can't wait for it to be 2143 so WW1 shitposters can kill themselves already

>vehicles

Ya know, Tanks would be rather interesting. Instead of a rolling C4 magnet, you have a rolling slow as fuck pillbox that you can shoot out of and maybe kill people with while the enemy team figures out some way to deal with you - no recoilless rifles or anti-tank explosives, so your down to bullseye'ing with arty, or cracking a tread - pulling the lid off and filling it with flame.

That would be fun

Are you autistic?

But if it's World War 1, how will it appeal to normies?

If it was truly a "ballon airship" you would know balloons can't be steered, that's why the Germans created the Zepplin, it's a steerable "ballon-like airship" because if it was just a ballon airship, you would be talking about massive giant air balloons.

...

they'll throw ayylmao's into it

1243 please. Mongol conquest fps sounds neat.

A Battlefield during that time period would be great if it was executed well

I'd play it
>DICE actually making a new Turok with a bad ass single player and good arena MP with guns and shit but not CODshit and with gore

>tfw ANOTHER generic american tuff guy modern shooter

You are fucking retarded, there were already grenades and various explosives in WW1, also those tanks had only a few mm of armor so pretty much anything aside from a pistol had a chance at penetrating them and killing crew inside. They also had vents to cool the engines and if you get flame or explosive there everyone in the tank is fucked.

>waahh I wanted le generic american tough guy WW2 shooter instead

nigga I never said a thing about WW2, I just said modern shooter.

What if the shadow is pic related being raised and not something in the air at all

I would shit my pants

Alternate History WW1 that never ended, diesel mecha and crudely modified old timey weapons.

Please let this be driveable ingame

>ww1
>no vehicles

Stop memeing you idiot.

Don't ever reply to me again.

(you)

EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

Starts in 30 minutes
youtube.com/watch?v=IDqkEvKwI6M

The reveal isn't until 9pm GMT.

1243

>You missed Big Red One
Your mom misses it too ;^)

It's gonna be 2042

That's clearly a pterodactyl

>2143

It's not even on the picture showing the bf history.

That's because 2143 is set in the future dummy

its way too difficult to watch this history shit. Especially when they're showing how battlefield used to be. Nothing will ever bring it back.

again, that's near future/futuristic, not sci fi.

Do you honestly not see the distinction between those and something like star wars or halo?

i would love for it to be ww1 but i dont see it happening