We discuss nostalgia

>Conker got raped by microsoft
>Spyro has been getting raped and it's slightly in a good spot thanks to Skylanders
>some crash hype going on because of some easter egg
>last Mario game was a "make your own Mario" because people didn't want more Mario
>new Sonic game this year that will probably be shit because it's Sonic
>Star Fox had a sup-par sequel
>F-Zero is dead

rehashing gameplay is ok because you can take it to a different direction and build a whole new world around new characters

but damn, some things should just be left behind already

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/okPLF9Ad9ns
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

This is why Mega Man being dead is good, he deserved the closure and peace he got

>mainstream fags BTFO
>Nintenfags BTFO
>Platforming fags BTFO

>mfw two System Shock games is coming out

Say, if Mighty No 9 would've come out the way it was supposed to, i would've loved that game to take the banner and keep going with that gameplay, and maybe get sequels that tell a story and bring new things to the table

but no, mr. conman had to ruin everything

i'm hoping for Yooka Laylee to succeed so i can have B&K back without actually having to make another B&K game with the same characters

Wow what, i thought this was cancelled

nah

we're getting a System Shock 3 and a SS1 remake

They're by the old staff who worked on SS1 & SS2 back at OG Irrational and Looking Glass, under the name Otherside Games

get hype, my fellow user

correction: Above goes for SS3, SS1 remake will mostly be by Night Dive Studios (these guys who got many old games on GOG including OG SS1 and SS2)

But see, i hate when devs bring back dead franchises and their head marketing line is "X GAME IS BACK BABY!" you can tell it's going to be a turd that will try to make bank just with the game title

don't get me wrong either i've played and liked System shock 1, never touched 2, but those games are old and should stay behind

>your favourite series is some obscure games that only a bunch of europeans remember
>somehow the gaming industry still find a way to ruin it

BRAVO NOLAN

SS1R has a trailer

youtu.be/okPLF9Ad9ns

SS3 certainly won't be out before '18-'19

how many games does this thing have?

>but those games are old and should stay behind
spotted the dumbass

Shame some fans never do shut up about it even though the series had about ten titles for each fucking main line and sub line and spin-off line, even to its very beginning.

I mean, sheesh, some times, it's better off to let the eagle spread its wings and let it fly to a land unknown instead of keep pushing it while in your hot air balloon only for it to spiral to its own death and you having to witness it.

Only God know what'll happen to Crash if they do intend make something out of him. And I really fucking doubt the kids nowadays will even care about him.

Shit would be like new PPG. And I wouldn't wish that to ANY form of media, be it a video game or a cartoon.

>he is wrong because i say so
i would like you to prove me wrong and then call me a retard than just calling me a retard because you can't prove me wrong

>

>2 cliffhangers
>closure

I agree that most of the talent has left but come on now

Ratchet and Clank isn't even that old to have a reboot, yet it did to explain the origins of most things. It stayed mostly true to itself while still being made by the same people who created the franchise since the very beginning. Of course that'll work out alright.

As for iffy situations like Crash Bandicoot and Spyro? It really mostly depends on whoever is still on the development team behind it who were also there back then for the franchises.

And I ain't even gonna mention fucking Conker.

That poor bastard just wanted to die in a big bang and all he did was suffer a excruciating measly death, not being himself.

Call of duty would be worshipped If they ended at 4

>isn't even that old enough to have a reboot
user the game came out almost 15 years ago

i'm amazed the franchise is still alive though
and glad

i don't know how to feel toward remakes because i don't understand how long they take to make

they don't seem to be cashgrabs to me unless it's too recent

>Implying they'd ever address those cliffhangers with actual sequels

You're going to have a reboot, whether you like it or not. This is the generation where sequels are never considered.

just 2 which are older than 80% of Sup Forums userbase

>closure and peace

You know the reason everyone was so pissed about Mega Man's death was because the way it went out was about the exact opposite of closure and peace, right?

Not saying it needs to be dragged back up but Mega Man going out was more equivalent to being taken out back and beaten with a shovel than it was going out with grace or dignity.

That wonderful son of a gun of a franchise still was released on the PS2 though, compared to say Crash or Spyro or Parappa, who started out their lifes in the gray boombox.

And thanks, now I'm the one who feels old.

3 cliffhangers, actually.

Modern Warfare 3 and Black Ops is when the series started to get too goofy for me, it started looking like a fucking Michael Bay film

Yes, but i don't mind that then, it has a low number of games and they can't exactly use the line "guess who is back!" as a selling point

they have to innovate and they have to make it good in order to not be completely left in the dust again, it might aswell be treated as a new IP

It's ok for video game series to end :)

oh yeah,
MML2
MMZXA
MMX8
right?

Well the classic Megaman series is a cliffhanger anyway, since we never know what happens to the world before MX

So, 4

oh yeah, just remembered as well that in MMSF3 Geo has some Mu Metal inside him which Solo wants to retrieve, killing him in the process

so 5 maybe?

How can a game with so little focus on story have so many plotholes i wonder

Can't we basically say every Mega Man series ended without closure with the exception of MMZ?

yeah, only MMBN and Zero got closure