>metacritic
Metacritic
Leo King
Other urls found in this thread:
Luis Rodriguez
>buyer's remorse
ey, we've all been there Sup Forums. what's your buyer's remorse?
Austin Baker
>user scores
Ian Jenkins
>0 or 10
Truly the video game audience at work
Levi Carter
>0/10
>it's alright
>10/10
>it's alright
Aaron Evans
Sounds like he has broads in atlanta
Jeremiah Gomez
seems legit
Landon Rodriguez
Anytime I want to have a laugh, I look at this account:
Nolan Parker
>worst souls gets highest
how
Landon Hall
I'm still trying to figure out how this happened.
Jace Bell
3 is the worst
The "2 was bad" meme needs to die already
Xavier Ross
but it is
Jason Scott
It was the most accessible.
Definitely the worst in the entire series.
Caleb Hill
It's not a bad game, and that's not even what he said, stupid. It's just the worst game in an otherwise great series.
Jeremiah Thomas
But that's wrong, you retard
3 is the worst in the series. Hopefully the DLC remedies that
Cameron Butler
>It was the most accessible.
It's really not though. DS2 has too many unintuitive design choices like that depleting health bar will more likely only scare new players away from the series. DS1 and even 3 are infinitely better starting points to the series.
Gavin Hughes
>Played through DS1 like eleven times, not including NG+ playthroughs
>Played DSII for like 100 hours, multiple playthroughs and characters
>Played DSIII once, and then NG+, then a magic character
>Already sick of it
DSIII is the most boring shit in the universe, with boring level design besides the first area and horrible build variety
Cameron Turner
Mah nigga. You get it
The lack of viable build diversity, linearity, tedious level design, disappointing bosses, and watered down mechanics are why 2 was better than 3. Fromdrones will deny it because "muh miyazaki" and because 3 sucks off the first game so hard.
Hudson Sanchez
>DSIII is the most boring shit in the universe, with boring level design besides the first area and horrible build variety
You literally sound like you're mad because you're tired of Souls games. You ever consider that the problem is actually you?
Christopher Davis
Think of any recent PS4 game, I overpaid.
I held off for Bloodbourne to lower in price, it never did, bought it for $34 on Amazon, it's now $19.99 at Best Buy.
Gavin Young
Considering how short and linear 3 is (still a better game than 2), it's probably the most accessible.
Ethan Smith
No, it's just Dark Souls III.
Dark Souls II had some bullshit deaths and some weird changes to the level up system, but at the very least the levels weren't just boring hallways and corridors with ladders and shit everywhere. Everything in the game besides the High Wall and the Undead Settlement is a series of hallways, dark rooms, and staircases. No major variety in the areas you can go besides two forks in the road; one on the Road of Sacrifices and another in Irithyll, with everything otherwise being a straight line. DS1 and 2 had plenty of rooms off the beaten path where you could explore to find items, NPCs, and there's almost none of that in DSIII. DSIII has no highs and no lows, just a mediocre trudge from beginning to end
Luis Jones
>Dark Souls II had some bullshit deaths and some weird changes to the level up system, but at the very least the levels weren't just boring hallways and corridors with ladders and shit everywhere.
That's literally Dark Souls 2 you're describing, and that's about as bland as level design gets, friend. The only shit areas in DS3 are The Catacombs and Smouldering Lake, and one of those is completely optional anyway.