I really hope we get a PC port. The most recent screenshots make it clear that it's a huge change, not just uprezzed or whatever like a lot of "next gen" ports.
I really hope we get a PC port. The most recent screenshots make it clear that it's a huge change...
I doubt Return to Arkham is going to be ported to PC.
As Arkham Knight proved, PC architecture is unable to handle eight-gen console games.
>baiting this poorly
Wow, what a ridiculous cover. Could it be more ugly?
While it is bait, I am worried that we'll never see a port as a result of AK's abysmal PC launch. It performs well enough now but no one wants to risk it because of the trash heap it was at launch.
Ps4 couldnt handle it either
>PC can't handle the game
>UH BAIT BAIT BAIT
Just because it makes your double chin start sweating doesn't mean it's not true, cuck.
Is the XBONE getting the JOKER DLC?
>giving him a (you) anyway
If they do have one planned it will probably be a while as whoever is in charge will take their time with it. You don't refund god knows how many copies of a game along with handing out free copies of the past 4 games to hundreds of thousands of people and just blow it off.
I like the card motif but I wish they'd used original art or two portraits that looked better together.
Are either of them? That's actually an interesting question.
He played like complete shit, though. But I guess that was a challenge in itself.
Don't post this Shadshit garbage on my Sup Forums
>the quality of a port is only determined by the hardware and developer agency has nothing to do with it
What's it like being brain dead?
>Is the XBONE getting the JOKER DLC?
Yes.
Chances of the armored Batsuit in the campaign for Asylum is more or less nil, right?
Fuck off with your bullshit.
Most of the Unreal 4 screenshots look worse than the Unreal 3 versions
The screenshots look like absolute garbage what the fuck are you talking about
Is this just Asylum?
Looks like shit though
Isn't AK in UE3, though? The game looks fantastic even with the older engine
...
I never got to play that shit on PS3.
It was never on the menu.
It is, they should've just updated some textures and make it 1080p60
Now it looks like shit and will probably run like shit
NO WAY THIS IS REAL, RIGHT?
These actually look worse than the original.
>that Dragon Age 3 hair...
Oh Christ
...
I don't know what your talking about OP. Everything I seen of the new version looks worse then the PC release.
Very little reason to bring this to PC when the PC version of the first 2 games can run at 4k 60FPS already
...
Top looks better.
>people falling for this obvious bait
It looks like entirely new, shittier assets.
Look at the picture fuckwit.
Not sure if joking? PC performance far surpasses that of consoles, you silly dingbat.
Jesus fuck it's Metro 2033 Redux but even worse. Why do they always fuck up the lighting?
>mortal kombat x gets a shitty outsourced pc port and people judge it accordingly
>arkham knight gets review bombed to hell understandly due to an incredibly sloppy outsourced port by yet another 3rd party, and the devs drop support after a few months
>mortal kombat X for pc will not be getting any new improvements from the XL version of the game not even netcode fixes
if were looking at patterns I wouldn't be suprised if pc wouldn't get a port because of how hard they shat on warner brothers even thought it was justified
Awful.
i haven't played the game but these "cutscenes" aren't pre rendered right?
it looks like they replaced pre rendred cutscenes with in engine
>The most recent screenshots make it clear that it's a huge change
Yeah, for worse, enjoy paying 50 bucks for demo of PC that costs five bucks on sale.
I'm pretty sure that's exactly what happened, judging by these screenshots.
If I'm not mistaken, all cutscenes that weren't just face-to-face dialogue (like when you're prompted to talk to some random dude standing there) were pre-rendered. If not all, at least most of them.
What went wrong? Besides forcing you to use the batmobile every 5 minutes
The PC port, that's it.
>no real boss fights
>too many shitty Riddler junk
>too little team up with sidekicks
>shitty new gadgets
>The new goons were just reskins of titans and ninjas from AC and AO
No final boss (the game hardly had bosses in the first place), and that Gears of Joker shit was beyond cringey.
Besides gameplay, the main story was dogshit. The side stories were done well enough. Sure, they were minuscule, but they touched on villains enough, especially the likes of Professor Pyg and Man-Bat. I wanted them to finally be featured in a game, and got what I wanted out of them.
That main story was almost complete dogshit. Some of it was told alright, but as a whole it was disappointing. Shoehorning Joker in to take over the show pissed me off to no end. The first two games' stories were good, if not at least passable. Sure, Arkham Asylum's epilogue was horribly embarrassing (if you really have to borrow shit from the 2004 series, you've got problems), and City's "protocol 10" scheme was kind of idiotic, but they were at least enjoyable all-around. There's almost nothing redeemable about Arkham Knight's story. The only reason I didn't see Knight being Jason Todd is because I refused to believe it. I refused to believe that they were that fucking stupid and predictable. Also, they lied to people about who Knight was. I feel like if Dini didn't leave, we could've gotten a better story.
They also missed the opportunity for a cameo of this motherfucker for the secret ending.
They cameod Azrael though who precedes BatGordon
those eyebrows...
Still, there're no reflections at all and the models look way worse. Look at the shit they did with Unreal 3 in AK.
They could've just updated some textures
>No final boss
Well that's a bummer. Just something I'll have to expect whenever I get to Knight then.
How did I not notice that? All of my fucking nope.
They did much worse.
I was helping when Sup Forums created that parody GotY boxart for Bamham.
...
>tfw Mr. Freeze fight will never be topped
BAMA HAM?
Oh shit it's real and coming out in July. I hadn't finished Knight yet but I think I'll wait now and replay these first two before ending the trilogy. Wish they included Origins though even tbough it's not rocksteady. It wasn't nearly as good but I wouldn't mind playing through once more.
WHOA BLACK BETTY
Do you still have it? I can only find this one. Thought I had others.
why would you even bother getting this when you can already run the games in high res
>Mr. Freeze: Ultimate test of your sneaking and stealth ability
>Clayface: Ultimate test of your combat and dodging abilities
I think they knew these couldn't be topped, so they didn't bother.
>"arkham knight will be a totally original character for the game"
>side bosses like pyg are qtes
>when you actually 'fight' the knight its nothing more than ac deadshot encounter rehashed, not once, not twice, but three times. in a row.
>final boss is a cutscene
>deathstroke enters the game and just enedlessly shit talks you to come and fight him. when you do its another tank fight.
>hey guys we replace gordon with breaking bad tough guy mike, isn't this just epic???
then you had all the pre release advertising the game "wow guys look how vertical we made the city isn't this cool?? you can glide up and down under these bridges and we put these sweet new glide boosts in!" then you're locked in the god damn tank for whole game. there's signs of life of a good game in knight but they quickly vanish, what a shameful and disappointing ending to the series.
>Clayface fight
>Good
So are Rocksteady one of the last companies left to realize there's no money in PC versions of games?
>deathstroke enters the game and just enedlessly shit talks you to come and fight him. when you do its another tank fight.
When I first learned of Deathstroke being in the game, I thought "There's no way it'll be worse than the Origins fight" but holy shit, was I wrong.
Or was I? It wasn't even a fight.
>mfw joker got a fucking meele boss fight in the DLC
>arkham knight only has tank and stealth fights
Boss fights are too archaic anyway.