Now that the dust has settled, can we all agree that 3 is the best of the Metal Gear Solid series?

Now that the dust has settled, can we all agree that 3 is the best of the Metal Gear Solid series?

Did anybody not retarded ever actually dispute this

First one is still the best. Gameplay wise, 4 is king.

See what I mean

Big boss was never necessary,they could of continued solid snake's story as It was already well developped.

Yes, Of course.

Yeah, 1 is the best for atmosphere and the plot/acting but 3 is the most fun to play.

3 is the best overall though.

V is best. Do not reply.

I think this is Sup Forums's favourite game in general, when it was polled a couple of years ago.

So yeah.

MGS2

>could of

2 and 1 are better.

I still feel 3 has the best self-contained story. 1 was also really good, but the outdated gameplay puts it a few paces behind 3.

2 is about an hour long if you take out all the cutscenes.

About 1/3 of the game is defusing bombs.

No

V is best game.

1 is best story.

and 3 is mostly filler

At least 2 had the sense to have VR missions

Its not the best at all.
Its story was stupid and the gameplay went form fun ass interior stealthing to crawl in bush for 10 minutes and constantly go to menus to heal yourself and change camo.
It was certainly not the best in any department, but it wasn't bad either.

3 is probably the best.

I don't think there should have been continuations of it though. Plotwise, it was best as its own self contained little thing. Big Boss goes in, comes out disillusioned with a title he never wanted. It's all wrapped up and neat and all the crap about DEH BOSSES WILL should've been cut. The Boss was important to BB because she was his mentor, not because she was a fucking messiah. Hell Big Boss is even named for surpassing her yet everybody's still up the Boss's ass. Fucking knock it off.

3 is 80% menu

3 is exactly when the series started its decline, but its not a bad game.

1 and 2 are pretty much THE MGS games. Everything else is just supplementary

I've been playing it recently for the first time

Man those Ocelot team fights are hard. But then I'm crap.

Just like SH3

>and 3 is mostly filler
Don't you mean actual stealth gameplay?

>muh bombs
>muh swimming
>muh sword

If I wanted to bellycrawl behind boxes I'd just play Splinter Cell

It does that kinda thing alot better without silly camo an "survival" gimmicks

yes

Ground zeroes is the best thing to come from mgs.

>muh camo
>muh eating and healing menus
>muh crawling
I can do it too, 3 isn't that great.

>complaining about crawling in a stealth game

MGS3 was the peak of the series' complexity. I appreciate the expanded nonlethal arsenal MGS4 had, but things only became more casual from there.

>complaining about swimming when 3 has swimming sections as well

brilliant

2 is the best.

I don't even consider it a metal gear game.

It's the spin off that attracted all the retards that just want explosions.

It's essentially a third person shooter with terrible controls and unrealistic stealth.

>MGSV came out almost 9 months ago
WHAT

MGS was never about that kind of stealth. It was the quick face paced interior stealth. It should never have been a semi realistic crawling simulator. It slowed the pace down by miles.

The whole Big Fag saga was a mistake, nobody wanted prequels.

>I don't even consider it a metal gear game.
Same, to me MGS1/2/4 are the real MGS.

All this other stuff is just whatever and was never needed, 4 would have been much better if Snake Eater never existed or was kept separate from Solid Snake's timeline.

Exactly.

Seeing people frothing at the mouth for MGSV then being BTFO was hilarious.