>Blizzard removes an entire Tracer animation from Overwatch >Hardly any complaints, nobody brings it up anymore >Lab Zero makes artistic corrections to a handful of frames of animation >Sup Forums shitposts nonstop, bringing up the subject literal months after it happened every time Lab Zero comes up to try to prevent Indivisible from getting funded
Something isn't right here.
Gavin Rodriguez
Overwatch came out and isn't dead yet.
Ethan Sanchez
> Something isn't right here.
Your birth.
Josiah Sanchez
>Lab Zero makes artistic corrections to a handful of frames of animation hahahahahahahahahaha
John Thompson
...
Aiden Ortiz
nice
epic
i like it
Julian Myers
Get fucked OP.
Colton Watson
It was literally a handful of frames of animation that showed panty for the sake of showing panty. As in, clothing was defying physics just to show panty. You're an idiot if you think that "censorship" was the goal. If it was, all of the pantyshots and jiggling titties would have been censored.
Andrew Carter
Blizz replaces one vaguely sexual pose with a moderately sexual pose.
Lab Zero replaces several frames of moderately sexual frames with vaguely sexual frames.
You do the math.
Liam Taylor
>Lab Zero makes artistic corrections to a handful of frames of animation They admitted it was done because people were offended. Don't pull that bullshit
Hudson Miller
That combined with their comments about Indivisible's audience versus Skullgirls' and their intentions were pretty clear. But they got their money, so why even give them more attention?
Jason James
Source?
Carson Thomas
>Sup Forums cares more about a popular game from a popular publisher more than a dead indie game from a literally who developer
Logan Brown
Blizzard made the pose even sexier, though
Benjamin Gutierrez
People blew the fuck up over the tracer pose until it turned out they replaced it with a better pose.
Literal who game covers up 3 underwear shots so the moms of their target audience will let them buy it and no one cares. Seems fair to me.
Carson Wood
...
Joseph Campbell
>It was literally a handful of frames of animation that showed panty for the sake of showing panty. As in, clothing was defying physics just to show panty. Which was the artist's original intent. Then some people complained, and fearing being labeled as 'sexist', and other titles, made some changes. To seal it, they even made statements confirming the obvious.
You are a fucking retard if you don't think they were influenced to do this. Or fishing for (you)s
Anthony Bell
Source?
Liam Collins
tracer pose was replaced with an equally sexy one. pantsu in your image have been replaced with halal approved skirt lengths
Camden Jackson
Source on those statements?
Christian Fisher
Stripes? Niiiiiice.
Juan White
I know its because its SJWs doing the complaining that Sup Forums is mad but are you really that against a game company changing the game to suit consumers? I can't really say that I wouldn't shift a few things due to complaints if I thought it would sell more copies. Its just irresponsible as a business to ignore consumer demand like that. Obviously, we know that the Sup Forums type outnumber the SJW players by a huge amount but tell me how much Sup Forums players actually post about shit like this except here. SJWs in comparison probably output 10x more content on social media to new markets. Appealing to SJWs is always the right choice from a money perspective, appealing to Sup Forums or satisfying their own sense of morals is a liability. Does Sup Forums want Lab Zero to fail because of a few frames of animation?
Landon Cox
>Tracer animation This shit's just getting so laughable.
Cooper Wood
skirts are translucent against some backgrounds on the new engine. the most basic attacks have panty shots beowulf has a broken clothes scene. etc etc
Ethan Peterson
lab zero can't afford shills
Gavin Martin
Give it time.
Elijah Butler
It's not that a developer changes something that gets people angry. It's the reasons behind the change that twists peoples nipples. In particular when a dev does it to please some group that will never play that game.
Jason Hughes
No one plays skulls girls, thats why no one cares
Henry Mitchell
There isn't, the only official response explains that the reworked frames came about internally as they looked amateurish compared to the team's refined later work.
Ayden Reed
>factually >CANON >NOPAN Why people are even complaining?
Christian Gutierrez
>lab zero shills are still shilling even when there's no shilling to be done >they do it for free
Nathan Scott
He did it
Nathaniel Peterson
That's pretty much it. The developers removed it because they were some early work and they later realized it didn't fit the vision they were going for, and was just shitty pantyshots for the sake of it.
I don't see how anyone could really accuse Lab Zero of compromising on their vision. That, and I'd never notice or even care about the so-called censoring if you all didn't bring up constantly.
Evan Morales
>blizzard removes animation >nobody gets upset
People here were screaming MUH SJWS MUH GG MUH CENSORSHIP non fucking stop until they released that new pose from a fucking pinup poster.
Colton Rivera
>>Hardly any complaints, nobody brings it up anymore Were we visiting the same vee?
Brayden Foster
why would she ever need to do this when she could just punch directly upward with her fisthat
Michael Allen
Do you see that boot? Its fucking pointy, take someones eye out with that.
Brody Peterson
As far as realism goes someone that's in the air and really close to her would take more damage from the boot than from the fist hat. In terms of game mechanics I've never played the game, and have no interest in playing it, but since the kick has shorter range than the fist hat is probably has less startup and/or less cooldown than making a big uppercut.
John Butler
gaters literally invented reasons for why they were removed, it's amazing how deluded they are.
Dylan Green
I like the new Tracer pose better desu senpai
Easton Campbell
you only think you like it because you have internalized censorship
Zachary Brooks
Nah, I think it just accentuates the butt more.
And my dick appreciates it.
Camden Bell
3dpd vs 2d gee i wonder which one Sup Forums - anime will complain about more??
Evan Ward
because the pose they replaced it with is a similar better looking one that still shows her butt off?
Aaron Harris
Post it
William Myers
>>Blizzard removes an entire Tracer animation from Overwatch >>Hardly any complaints, nobody brings it up anymore Are you talking about the butt pose argument that was literally all over the internet for weeks?
Samuel Baker
In case anyone misunderstands how insignificant one frame of animation really is. This is the current Cerecopter animation. Now compare this to , which has not been altered.
There is no justification for how much rage the corrections made.
Noah Sanchez
Damn straight there ain't no justification, because the rage is infantile, friend.
David Allen
HER LEGS ARE SO FUCKING LONG
Grayson Jackson
I think the bigger joke here is implying people still give a shit about Shitgirls.
Noah Edwards
...
Jack Smith
What was the whole point in censoring one frame when they left so many others uncensored?
Cooper Evans
10 frames of animation against full attacks and even crouching panty shots?
Michael Hernandez
They made no sense, like user previously said, it was clothes defying physics for the sake of a panty shot.
Angel Wood
Because it was an animation correction, not censorship. They didn't do it to appease anyone but themselves
Isaiah Cruz
>There is no justification for how much rage the corrections made.
It told them they were going to piss their fanbase off if they continued.
Nolan Reyes
People still talk about Skullgirls?
William Ortiz
Skullgirls died when Lab Zero willingly sold out their original fanbase for the tumblr fanbase.
Eli Ramirez
>tumblr
Hey... I liked the "Ask Ms. Fortune" Tumblr thingy.