Why did I only hear about this today?
youtube.com
"IS defense".
Anybody played it? Any good?
So ISIS takes over the Middle East and North Africa and invades Europe, you sit in a turret and blast invading terrorists of different types for points.
Why did I only hear about this today?
youtube.com
"IS defense".
Anybody played it? Any good?
So ISIS takes over the Middle East and North Africa and invades Europe, you sit in a turret and blast invading terrorists of different types for points.
Cool game
OP here.
It's from the guys who made "Hatred".
Looks boring. Rail shooters belong in arcades and the early 2000s. Obviously the devs just try to make the edgiest game possible and hope that attracts enough people.
Hatred was banned here (Australia) and I wanted to support the devs on that one for finally making something that is at least a bit different from the norm and shakes up the current gaming community climate.
Hatred did it it more than IS defense though it seems, this just seems like a game that will make dads laugh.
Plus it seems like it doesn't require a bit commitment.
Short but fun. Properly challenging. Upgrades and managing support are damn important.
They added new map lately but haven't played it yet.
Found the guy who never played Beach Head 2000
it's actually really good as far as rail shooters go anyway
>supposely long dead genres get new games
>it's a bad thing
This is COD as streamlined as possible, only interesting.
kinda fun mindless shooter but it gets old pretty quickly since there's only like 3 levels or so
so you'll need to grind too much to get to the next level/get proper skills and perks
That's just bullshit, the guy seems pretty rational, but they're saying he is racist and islamophobic and shit because he made an anti ISIS games, what the fuck is wrong with that?
"ISIS doesn't represent Islam! It has *nothing* to do with it!"
>make a game where you kill ISIS
"This is Islamophobic!"
The slavs are right, you just do what you want and fuck these idiots.
>Racist: 'I have nothing against being called anti-Islamic or xenophobic, because yes, I kind of am, I admit it,' Mr Zieliniski told MailOnline
those fucking tabloids are so miserable that i don't even...
Literally a free flash game with better graphics.
Playing Civ 5?
Pssh, found the kid that didn't play Civ 4
>The slavs are right, you just do what you want and fuck these idiots.
>Not listening to the slavic wisdom.
You will see in time that it is the only correct path.
>dead genre
Interesting, they actually say that here (last part) as it's a side project to see where they could go with it.
So I spouse the idea is they're testing the concept for some other, larger project.
Here we go again, free advertising for the devs.
excuse me, what?
Looks like a shit game to be honest. And this is coming from a cunt who wants to brutally torture murder every one of those fucking savages.
>hurr durr let's see how much we can milk the 'unoriginal simple game with le controversial theme' cashcow
What's next, a Trump race game? SJW bashing fight game?
You have to be a special kind of gullible sheep to fall for this sort of advertising whose goals are obviously to provoke:
1) butthurt from regular butthurt circles
2) approval from vacuous manchildren who learn their ideology from Sup Forums, reddit, youtube and alt-right blogs
Except it isn't Muslims getting upset over this, it's liberals getting offended for them.
>anti-jihadi is a bad thing
>It's a "Destructive Creations is out of money again" thread
>politically fictional
>fictional
>IS defense
>not playing as ISIS, underweaponed and understaffed and defending from motherfuckin Russian onslaught
>Trump racing game
So what if it's controversial, pisses off people like you and somebody actually likes it?
Does the world end?
Ain't gonna lie this would be pretty fun with VR support
It seems simple enough to run.
>le Trump is evil meme
you literally call every non-democrat president "a new Hitler". It's so old, no one cares anymore, you just embarrass yourself
It looks like a shitty ftp mobile game.
>So what if it's controversial, pisses off people like you and somebody actually likes it?
So what? Nothing, I don't give a fuck, all of that is 100% fine with me, and like 65% with most other people (who are more sensitive to controversy).
The problem is that low-quality videogames are getting a massive PR boost and attention. It draws attention away from better things.
The only thing that pisses me off about it is the people who will talk about it and buy it solely because it pisses someone else off. I'm not phased by the game itself, I'm phased by the predictable reaction of the consumers who put artificial drama first and quality second.
That was just an example of a game that would have some controversy attached to it. I have, and have not expressed, any particular feelings towards Trump and you should all stop being so defensive about him.
>That was just an example of a game that would have some controversy attached to it.
what's controversial about it?
Well I don't have any games like it (and never played them in arcades as a kid) and the graphical effects look nice for my new video card.
As for a PR boost, pffft yeah right.
Compared to other games being discusses here and Hatred's reaction, this isn't even a blip on the radar.
>Controversy
Zelda had controversy at one point for a star and a moon offending Islamic sensibilities.
Things offend all sorts of people and the same people who always show up in these threads are the "everybody is stupid but me" types.
>I wanted to support the devs on that one for finally making something that is at least a bit different from the norm and shakes up the current gaming community climate.
looks like a mobile game
Show me a game where the antagonist is ISIS and I'll show you ten where it's Nazis and Russians.
Besides, is GG so gone from your memory?
This is the world we live in.
>Hey, don't try to stop the Nazis that would hurt their feelings and you will have to learn that not all Germans are Nazis, it's just a minority. We must let them blitzkrieg us or we are the evil
Trump is a controversial persona, do the math.
>Compared to other games being discusses here and Hatred's reaction, this isn't even a blip on the radar.
True, people learned a little something, but I still see threads about it here.
>Zelda had controversy at one point for a star and a moon offending Islamic sensibilities.
>Things offend all sorts of people
You are making a generalization that has no factual background. Surely, everything could theoretically offend someone, but some things will likely offend more people than others.
You can't tell me that Need for Speed is baiting for controversy with its themes, and you can't tell me that Hatred/game in OP are not.
You can generally draw a clear line between PR stunts and things that just happen to be controversial due to unforeseen circumstances.
>the same people who always show up in these threads are the "everybody is stupid but me" types.
>I always get called out and am rarely right so it must be my imageboard boogieman that's to blame!
>I'll show you ten where it's Nazis and Russians.
There is presently no controversy attached to those ideas.
They have access to all the best western equipment since they trade with the "moderate rebels" and their infinite free supply from the US and France and they looted a ton of state of the art weaponry in Iraq.
Assad have to make his bombs himself with barrels and Kurds are dirt poor but ISIS does not lack money or fancy weapons.
sweet shills brah
Interesting, but this is not how Old Continent will be conquered though.
Muslims "immigrants" will simply outbreed native population, and fast, thanks to welfare system. And their children will be as backward as their parents. because any attempt to enforce integration will be branded "xenophobic" and "racist".
Sharia Law and as following Peace in Islam, will be created using Europe's democracy. Pretty ironic.
>take what's basically a minigame in every AAA FPS/TPS in the past 10 years
>make a game out of it
>ISIS
>Ever being capable of conquering swathes of territory and invading Europe with an actual army
o i am laffing
Who fucking cares about the enemy? The game looks like shit and the only reason they used ISIS is to draw in retards like you and create controversy to drive sales.
>Trump is a controversial persona
for liberals, who will never accept non-liberal president anyway. It hardly counts.
I didn't get called out, that was yourself.
You used the typical nonsense we read here every other day of "this is why everybody is an idiot, etc".
It's the same case of people saying "Islamic state has nothing to do with Islam", so some developers make a game where they try and take over and you kill them, then "wham" controversy and it's somehow now inappropriate.
Get lost, really. Pontificating (and pretending not to care), then whining when nobody bites isn't impressive.
There are always people who are offended at anything they don't like, they don't get to be gatekeepers until they decide not to be offended anymore. If this bothers you, that's really not my problem.
It's yours.
Well, its 7$ game. Not that much for a minigame.
>There is presently no controversy attached to those ideas.
>Russians
>No controversy
Are you living under a rock or something?
...
>brown and bloom
>bloody screen so real
>oversized UI with things that pop up in your face
It's the "I don't see it, it's not happening" school of ideas.
it looks pretty good for indie game though
>trusting in Slav wisdom
>literally unironically voted for communist parties after WW2
>literally democratically accepted communism
>b-but the west left us for dead
>b-but Soviets saved us from the Germans
>b-but it was rigged
By slavs I mean central and south-eastern Europe, obviously fuck russian monkeys
>disapproved of by the most world leaders
>constant outrage about him in the media
>hurr it's just stupid libcucks
>hurr durr look at intelligent I can sound when I try
>if X that you didn't even bring up bothers you, it's not my problem
Stellar way to avoid admitting that you're wrong but still pull out of the argument.
I wanted to write "almost no." There is obviously none or almost none in the mainstream circles. I don't know what your sources are like.
Some people still expect the same content than a $80 game with 4 $10 LDC because it is a game against Jihad.
>but I still see threads about it here
so you won't be satisfied until everything about game is blocked and silenced, because it triggers you?
>Stellar way to avoid admitting that you're wrong but still pull out of the argument.
How can you even be wrong on a matter of opinion, this is what happens when idiots get angry and try and "talk like the smart people on the telly".
>I don't know what your sources are like.
Well I watch world news, not what the latest shooting or stabbing was in my city. So I can see how you get confused.
>Disapproved of by most world leaders
"Appeal to authority" fallacy, a textbook case.
Since we've already established you don't think for yourself and instead guide yourself by hormone induced emotional reactions (and insults), we can see how far this discussion will take us.
>m240G
>doing that much damage
lmao what the fuck
>disapproved of by most of socialist Europe
fixed for you
>constant outrage about him in strongly left leaning American media
yeah, they're getting desperate, they go ways to smear him, and it's so obvious even average Joe can see it.
the media are corrupt globalist commie libcucks you dumb faggot
pic related it's you
day of the rope soon
quad damage, kid
>In USA there is no controversy, therefore nobody cares.
Russians still believe that during wars they "rescued" eastern Europe from Nazi menace (and of course anything kind of evil that "Comrades" did is a lie and manipulation)
>for finally making something that is at least a bit different
This is something I'll never understand.
>6.66 euros
>or 6,66 euros in mainland Europe's fucking stupid retarded idea of switching commas and decimals
They know exactly how to push buttons, even if it's incredibly obvious they get away with it.
Wow you really called out my pseudofascist SJW cuck ass out on something I didn't even say or imply, didn't you? Keep defending the shill's interests.
>hurr durr I'm wrong so you're an idiot
And you're even wronger now with this post, and I'm gonna tell you why so that I can educate your stupid ass:
>"Appeal to authority" fallacy, a textbook case.
This is why you're a stupid fuck. You immediately kneejerk trying to dig out some smart concept like a logical fallacy, and then you apply it to somewhere where it has no basis.
Me saying that world leaders disapprove of Trump does not mean that they are right about him. I brought that up as an indicator of him being controversial. If more than 20 world leaders, people backed by somewhat legitimate approval of their nations, make a claim condemning Trump, you cannot tell me that he is not controversial (regardless of whether he's good or not, right or wrong, whatever.)
>most of socialist Europe
>they're socialists so they don't matter
This is about videogames senpai, not about general WWII views. I'm from Southeastern Europe, for reference.
>Rewarding someone for being unoriginal but edgy
Upgrades
>2 giving combined quad ROF
>minigun-style fed, so no need to reload
>incendiary bullets
later I also unlocked HE-I bullets
it never gets too easy though, because game increases spawnrate as you go through upgrades
>socialism works
>shakes up the current gaming community climate
>isometric shooter
>edgy
Explain that.
>my trailer park has a better economic model than prosperous countries like Norway
It actually does
GDR had a higher living-standart than USA has today, as well as no starving people, proper educational system etc etc
>people backed by somewhat legitimate approval of their nations
In democratic elections?
I can think of some democratically elected, others I can think of are unelected monarchs and EU officials who are most assuredly not.
Please try not to argue in bad faith, you're trying to say "therefore it's bad", it's evident in everything you're saying.
Though it was nice to feel like you had me for a few moments, wasn't it?
Just call everybody a hick or something so we can let the thread end.
shill/10
looks bland and fucking boring, target audience is obviously CoD and those who jizz to explosions. Being edgy and censored can't help this game.
>The European equivalent of the Emirates
>Having money
Don't thanks social democracy for that.
>something that is at least a bit different from the norm and shakes up the current gaming community climate
Really, you actually unironically believe this?
> they're saying he is racist and islamophobic and shit because he made an anti ISIS games
Well, he admitted to being both of those things.
>HURR capitalists are ALL le "WHITE TRASH" hehe LOL!!!
tfw niggers have an average iq 20 points lower than "white trash" :(
>east germany
dont have any badthinks or youll be in the german gulag friendo :^)
>communists still unironically try to shill on Sup Forums after gamergate
i think gamergate may actually have won trump the election tbqh
if you leftists played your cards closer to your chest you could have elected hillary and destroyed the world from there
>game is boring as fuck
>sandniggers don't even scream allahu akbar
refunded/10
>The European equivalent of the Emirates
>Norway
>they're socialists so they don't matter
Why would you form opinion using arguments of people who reject reality and facts that does not follow their beliefs? You're just following religious movement at this point.
>I can think of some democratically elected, others I can think of are unelected monarchs and EU officials who are most assuredly not.
You're just grasping at one straw after another.
Ok, let's pretend that none of them were democratically elected. None. 0.
They are still people with tremendous power.
If people with power have vastly different views on something (Trump in this case), it's fair to call it controversial.
I'm eagerly awaiting your next post to provide further distractions (attacking my easily-agreeable example instead of my point)
You sound well-informed on the matter.
>tfw niggers have an average iq 20 points lower than "white trash" :(
>please respond even if it's 100% off-topic
Here's a (You)
>unironically preferring the GDR to the United States
Not even angry, just laughed and will probably tell a friend of the stupid shit I've read here.
People care less and less about the term (see: Trump, Europe now) because after repeated dishonest misuse and the term being so easily applicable, people would rather take back their intellectual freedom and give a pound of shit to the mouths of the people who spam the term at every thought criminal they encounter.
Since this was the only tool in the box (after intimidation in the few cases it was possible), the lack of arguments from these people is now evident and only slurs remain.
...
>communists still unironically try to shill on Sup Forums after gamergate
>i think gamergate may actually have won trump the election tbqh
This is your brain on Sup Forums.
>gamergate = Sup Forums
I want zoe quinn to leave
Again, you're either very stupid or baiting me.
I didn't, at any point, say any side was right in their opinion of Trump. I was stating that there was controversy about him, and citing various examples of tangible signs of controversy.
Also:
>form opinion using arguments of people who reject reality and facts that does not follow their beliefs?
>you cannot be a socialist unless you're delusional
Nice fascism senpai. You literally cannot grasp that people don't have to think like you.
Now that's controversial, since you've now moved back to a more honest argument.
Whereas until you were reminded you were trying to pass off their outrage as an excuse to not like it (since it's pretty clear your own views on the matter).
Also
>complains about controversy
>keeps bumping the thread
Piece of cake.
See you at the Bernie rally.
>it's a "Sup Forums gets triggered by Sup Forums" episode
Not vidya. Follow the rules.
I fucking loved that game.
This thread is the reason that Sup Forums is cancer.
There's never been anybody, male or female, at some social justice related event I'd rate higher than a 5.
>still talking about goobergate in 2016
>you were trying to pass off their outrage as an excuse to not like it
Link one sentence that proves this.
>complains about controversy
>keeps bumping the thread
This thread will perish in a couple of hours and it won't really contribute to the problem in a significant way. I might also change some gullible guy's mind.
>See you at the Bernie rally.
I'm so insulted :
Look up Norway and Sweden, and you're see they're in top of economic freedom. Look up again, and you'll see their economic growth slows down as they social spendings increased.
Prime example: Venezuela vs Chile. Both quasi-republics ruled by dictators. One socialist to the bone, one capitalist to the bone.
80% of their export are oil or oil related product. Need more?