Black Germans and Australian WW1 troops

>black Germans and Australian WW1 troops

is this accurate?

Other urls found in this thread:

awm.gov.au/encyclopedia/aborigines/indigenous/
youtube.com/watch?v=kCEUZ4rFiac
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>black germans
For fucks sake,
its a skin from the Harlem Hellfighters pack. Its cosmetic shit thats purely optional and will most likely be rare

the politically correct term is tanned germans

And I'm the King of Siam

There were German West African troops involved in the war, almost any nation with notable colonies did use many of them to provide soldiers later on into the war. Not enough to really warrant colonial troops in a game though. The only exception to this is britain where they pulled millions of their troops in from colonies, Australia does deserve to be in the game, as they had one million troops in the war and around 400,000 casualties which was a very significant portion of their population (even today, its only like 21m or so). A lot of indians and africans were involved to.

If anything it should be Germans/Turks/Austrians vs Slavs/Frenchies/Americans/British multicultural london

Soon the blackwashing of European history will be complete, and our descendants won't question why their overlords replaced Europeans with Africans through forced immigration.

It's incredible to behold.

Actually it's New German
Not even kidding. calling them migrants, foreigners, expats and etc. is deemed offensive by the left in Germany so the PC term is New Germans

>they put a black guy in a video game
>weRE BEIN TAKEN OVER BY DA NIGGERS@!

yeah but i bet killing a german nigger was like winning the lottery.

So many things about BF 1 is accurate, but of course you're most hung up on race. But I don't blame you. You don't control your autism - it controls you.

Wikipedia puts Australian deaths at about 60,000 and a further 20,000 from New Zealand. The Australian War Memorial says that the total Australian forces deployed were 400,000 out of a population at the time of 5 million.

Keep telling yourself that to cope with the fact that you're being systematically replaced by your leaders.

Your descendants will be unlike you in every way, will value things you don't value, will destroy most of your cultural artifacts, and will resent you at best and murder you at worst (see Rhodesia).

But keep sleepwalking. It's easier to deal with. :^)

Oh yeah i guess i remembered it wrong, thats still quite a lot though.

But it's not just put blacks in games, it's shoehorning them into scenarios and roles where they shouldn't be. Imagine if they used white people in a game about zulu warriors.

look senpai. its a video game. its not that deep.

yes, Germany has always been a diverse and accepting nation.

Black people don't have their history (not much of one anyway), so designers have to shoehorn them into white history to prevent angry chimpouts.

It's going to be funny in 40 years when whites are a minority in the US and 90% of characters are going to be nonwhite. That's what whites get for allowing themselves to go extinct, I guess.

if they actually integrated into our culture like that picture and the term suggests, I wouldn't even have a problem with that.
But en masse they don't and instead choose to culturally segregate themselves. It's like what happened with the turkish immigrants a few years ago, but cranked up to eleven.

If I can't be a Sikh and carve up Kebabs with a Tulwar then count me out.

Fucking autistic Sup Forumsacks invading Sup Forums...

>Black Anzacs.


U wot? The kiwis got pretty fucking tan but they didn't look like africa blacks.

Whites are a minority in USA. The 60% white statistic includes North African and Middle Easterners in it's numbers. It's actually about 49%.

Why do you think whites from other cultures assimilate so well and nonwhites don't? Because the genetic distance is too large for them to. It's the same in the U.S. Irish, Italian, German, Swedish, and English people all eventually assimilated, but Africans, Native Americans, and non-white Mexicans have not.

No matter how much egalitarians hate nature, it's a brick wall that will never go away.

>you will never play a game about the Sikhs battles against islamic tyranny and general badassedness

fuck this world

Black Germans soldiers at the time frame are incredibly unlikely by virtue of the fact that Germany never managed to keep hold of extensiive colonies in Africa unlike France and Britain. One of the points of worry for Germany during the first World War was exactly the fact that these countries had such a major source of manpower to draw from, while Germany had very little, mostly centered around possessions in Asia.

Fucking niggers

Honestly it's just disrespectful to the real heroes that fought that particular war. It was a war that was particularly known for being mostly a white male war.

>400,000 out of a population at the time of 5 million.

What the fuck how did they manage that?

eyo hol up nigga, we history now.

this our country now nigga, we presidents and we history, so you bes get used to it cracka for i put a nine up yo ass.

Global number 3

aussies love to fight

seriously, they fight each other for fun all the time, an uppercut to the throat is the average outbackster way of saying "howzit ya cunt?"

WE

Appealed to patriotism. A lot of people didn't think the war was going to be a big thing and that if they served they would be heroes and home within a few months. Apparently there were so many volunteers that recruiters had to start telling people to go away.

WUZ

More like the Brits used them as cannon fodder, wasted thousands of ANZAC lives for no reason at Galipoli and other pointless battles.

South Island Maori aren't tan at all.
Vast majority of Commonwealth troops (>97%) were white.
Respect to Sikh and Gurkha troops though, badass motherfuckers, all.

By being the bitch of Britain.

The British Raj and Canada were separate entities as well, but they still sent fuck loads of troops. It wasn't until post WW2 that this stopped and even then it still kinda happens. The only time it didn't was Vietnam where Australia had their SAS fighting for Americans because Britain was broke and was crying as it slowly gave up it's Empire.

What does it mean?.

>no Abo soldiers
fuggin racist whitefellas

*Germans of Color

Aussies have always had a strong love of the crown, they still have the queen on their money. This isn't a bad thing either.

We'd been our own state for barely more than a decade at that point. We still didn't even have Australian passports. What better way to prove ourselves than throwing ourselves into the fray to protect ol' England? It was after WW1 that we began developing our own cultural identity. In case you're interested, our primary strategic ally quickly switched to being the US after the Brits basically asked us to abandon Australia and consolidate our forces to protect England during WW2.

It's honestly amazing just how far historical ignorance can truly go, as well as the lies people will tell themselves and others to make the gaps fit their narrative.

Yes, as long as they look aboriginal.

awm.gov.au/encyclopedia/aborigines/indigenous/
>Over 1000 Indigenous Australians fought in the First World War. They came from a section of society with few rights, low wages, and poor living conditions. Most Indigenous Australians could not vote and none were counted in the census. But once in the AIF, they were treated as equals. They were paid the same as other soldiers and generally accepted without prejudice.

Then why don't modern niggers know how to bathe?

This meme. Galipoli was a situation that could not be stopped. Tactics didn't exist for offensive fights. Defensive technology, for the first time in history, out-rivalled offensive technology.

Also, look up who was in charge at Galipoli. Oh, you know what, I'll tell ya!

Brigadier-General Hughes and Colonel Antill ordered the suicidal attacks you see in such riveting films as Gallipoli and such.

In short, you've gotten your historical information from fucking films and memetic information, not from facts. So do some fucking research, ya cunt.

>-m-m-muh lions led by donkeys!!11oneoneelventyone!!111

The Officer class were a pack of rich cunts that refused to adapt to the new warfare, costing untold lives, destroying the psyche of the western world for all future, bitter cynicism and mistrust is all we have now.
The start of the 20th century was to be a great time of advancement and enrichment, instead we got exploitation, manipulation and incessant squabbling over fiat currency and broken ideals.

It's funny how the UK really treated its colonies, at least the Aussies learned quick. They sacrificed Canadians like lamb in WW1 and WW2.

But we don't have blacks in Australia. This is a spit on the grave of the soldiers that got fucked over and mass slaughtered for our country. Fuck you EA.

lol, people suddenly care about realism when its about race

I'm more concerned about the fact that the french army is DLC, and that the american army who did fuckall in WW1 are available at all.

Brits threw millions of their own into the grinder too you know

If black people taught white people how to bathe then why do black people smell so bad

I thought it was an error in communications? That they were to land elsewhere.

whatever helps you sleep at night goy

ANZAC in WW1 were Independent. They had been since the start of 20th century.

In short, they getting involved was 100% their own choice, not the British.

It's funny how a lot of you guys hide your racism behind "But i don't want them because they weren't there!!!!"

How about you focus on the fact that France isn't even a playable faction, when the multiplayer map we saw is LITERALLY in France?

You guys don't give a shit about black soldiers not making sense.

Come out with it. Stop lying to everyone and yourself.

Fucking underage edgy retards.

>100% their own choice, not the British.
W E W
E
W

LAD

Revisionists really are going to end western civilization.

Australia federated in 1901 but still saw itself as part of England and obligated to help fight its battles.

youtube.com/watch?v=kCEUZ4rFiac

>EA did this to stir up shit
>Sup Forums cant fucking stop themselves being idiots and falling for it

Why? Why are you posting in this fucking thread?

You fucking KNOW its EA baiting you, and you still fucking post.

What was that quote Rommel said?

>"If I had to take hell, I would use the Australians to take it and the New Zealanders to hold it."

Australians do not fear death. Australians have to face animals that want to kill them everyday.

Damn, I guess all those Roman Bathhouses were culturally appropriated.

Galipoli was a clusterfuck, but it wasn't British generals evilly sending glorious ANZAC's to their death. ANZAC's were lead by their OWN officers, their OWN commanders and by their OWN generals. They were INDEPENDENT AS A COUNTRY.

The Brits lost 34,000 troops at Galiopoli, the ANZAC COMBINED total was 11,500. The French, who for some reason aren't remembered to even be involved, lost 10,000. The Indians lost 1,400.

There was a lot of clusterfucks involved, but ANZACs, if they were at all 'callously slaughtered' by their officers, are to blame... You know, their own ANZAC officers. Who lead them and ordered them. The British didn't.

Or are you (or others) gonna blame the French losses on the British too?

Yeah, millions of fresh troops sent to the front lines didn't help at all. The allies would have been better off without them. Better off without their shipments of food, materiel, and billions in loans too.

But it was. It federated in 1901 and was considered it's own country, which, granted, had ties to Britain, but if it REALLY wanted to, it could have gone "no thanks".

It FELT obligated because this was the first war since their Federation and they had a point to prove against the British.

>Oh shit a war!
>Better get involved, or the Poms will think we're soft cunts!

And so they got involved, but they had their own commanders, generals and officers.

There was 400,000 British at Galipoli and only 60,000 ANZAC. That means 1 out of every 6 ANZAC trooper was killed.

You are a fucking fool if you don't think ANZAC commanders weren't pressured or forced to make decisions against their will.

I'll blame the English for everything because I'm a republican so heaping hate onto the Brits is like a hobby. Damn Queen made me burn my toast this morning.

>Australia has a massive epidemic of deaths due to 'one hit punches'
>county that doesnt even know its own strength and ends up killing guys because 'woops, i just wanted to hit him'

Its a picture from multiplayer, which you can customize appearances in.

The British had the largest Empire known to man. France had the 2nd largest Empire at the time. Britain had blockaded all supplies to Germany since 1919. In short, the war was about waiting. It had been won ever since the blockade was in effect.

The Americans sending millions of troops didn't help shit and the only reason they did was...

1. Lucitania sinking

and

2. They wanted to try out their new modern army against modern foes

Do some research.

They fucking joined in 1917, and only started to fight in 1918.

They did fuckall.

>Defensive technology, for the first time in history, out-rivalled offensive technology
Please dont say that. Defensive vs offensive technological development has fluctuated all across history. This wasn't the first time.

I'm not talking about generals or officers sending their troops to their doom. I'm talking about whether there was a fuck up in communications on where to land.

I'd expect nothing less from those generals too. If they believed that battle was so crucial to taking, they would have kept going.

Are abos not black?

>Everyone knows me ja?
>Ze Kaiser Wilhelm
>Coo-ee

Not really

They were meant to land somewhere else but they forgot to account for the tides or something and the boats ended up drifting to far and landing at Gallipoli.

>P-p-ressured us!

Everything is always somebody else's fault, huh?

Can't just accept that nobody knew how to fucking fight offensive battles for the good part of 3 years and even then there was no reliable technology to actually help?

>Brits invent tanks
>Germans countered with AT-Rifles
>Thus the offensive weapon is blunted

It came down to tactics, not weapons. Gallipoli was a fucking mountain region. I'm not saying it was a good idea, but it did help, in a round about way, as it tied up the Ottomans for a long time.

They barely even exist

When will there be a WWII game that shows the true diversity of the Waffen-SS?

Not anymore. You can be completely white and claim you're a descent of abbo culture for free welfare and benefits.

Just have to pay an abbo elder 2 slabs of beer to give you the all clear to the government.

The fact you think the ad-hoc German response to tanks via large caliber rifles somehow blunted British shows how little you understand of WW1 and warfare as a whole.

>No one knew how to fucking fight offensive battles

Nice meme. It was shit British leadership and planning, should have never been attempted, but they had plenty of bodies so fuck it.

Abos are barely people mate.
Abo children in the outback communities often lose their virginity at age 5 or so when their father rapes them as part of their culture.
Pornographic magazines are prohibited from entering their communities because they will see one and think all white women must be like that and will try and rape the female pilots/doctors/police out there.

They are the least human humans on the planet.

You misunderstand, it out rivalled it at a point where there was no strong counter to it. Machine Guns were vastly superior to anything offensive and it wasn't until later on in the war that anything came close to blunting them and even then it was shit.

At the start of 1914, the defensive weapon, the Machine Gun, had no strong counter and there was no way to fix it. In WW2, a machine gun nest won't stop a tank. In WW2, a machine gun nest could stop 1,000 men with rifles. And it did.

There was no specific major landing that went wrong, no. Not to my knowledge. But it's been ages since I read up about it, so might have forgotten. As far as I know, they landed in the right areas, but just got owned.

I'd like source on most of that for shitposting purposes and real life shit taking when ever one of my mates brings up abbos.

big publishers and devs listen to money. speak with your wallets.

Never, because minorities can't be Nazi's! That's be RACIST!

All you're saying is that defense was at a point where it was better than offensive, which is true.

Just dont pretend like it was the first time in history that it was the case.

Because white cultures are mostly similar.

The British tanks were blunted by it being a new machine, misused, to being unreliable and poorly designed. However, the fact is, the AT rifle was a response to the tank, along with dedicated fire from artillery.

As for fighting offensive battles, not at the time, not in any way that fucking mattered.

>shit leadership

Don't talk about ANZAC officers that way, you cunt.

>should never been attempted

Irrelevant to the conversation.

>plenty of bodies, fuck it

Nobody ever used them like that. You really think the officers liked seeing their men killed en masse?

The tactics you're claiming existed, despite not being employed, must be genius to behold. Does it involve jet bombers, reliable tanks and missiles, by any chance?

Shit like that happens constantly in media, you just don't notice because it's not about you.

>projecting this hard
1. i am racist but thats not my main problem for this game, its the fact they are shoehorning niggers into a war they barely participated in and making them the central attraction in a war that was mainly fought by white people in Europe.

This IS the slippery slope. THis is how it starts. One day kids will learn that all the great war heros were black and that white people never invented anything.

Who cares about a black character. What about the fact that everyone in the game seems to be carrying an automatic weapon. Or how retarded being a sniper in this game is.

The Germans figured out the counter to machine gun nests and trenches by the spring of 1918. The "last" part of the the war Eurokeks like to forget, that the Germans were running over British and French trench lines in the spring of 1918 and until the Americans arrived with massive reinforcements did it force the Germans into a surrender.

But Eurokeks think Americans should have been dying in the trenches years earlier under command of British and French commanders.

In history it's always been a leap frog thing. However, my point was, WW1 leap was larger than it had been previously. It's also difficult to fix things on the fly.

>This is what americans are taught in schools

oh i am laffin

Yeah Australians fought in WW1

Look up the ANZACs

> Implying eucalyptus niggers provided any advantage the WW1 other than cannon fodder.

> Be Mexican
> Constantly feel ignored by these PC people pushing agendas
> Only white and women are paraded around to show diversity
> Even in the US that's slowly becoming another Mexico