RE2>REmake>RE:CV>RE3>RE0>RE4>RE:R2>RE:R>RE5>RE6

RE2>REmake>RE:CV>RE3>RE0>RE4>RE:R2>RE:R>RE5>RE6

>RE2>REmake

u wot

I've never played any of them. I have a ps3 and ps tv. Also xbox one. What do I start with?

Remake.. Then 2, an so forth.

RE2>REmake>RE3>RE4>RE>RE0>Dead Aim>Others.

Play the original Resident Evil, its voice acting is super shitty which makes it fun. Plus if you play REmake first, you'll never be able to go back to the original RE.

RE4 > RE:R > *

My opinions > you're onions

Dino Crisis 1 > Dino Crisis 2 > REmake = RE4 > RE3 > RE2 > RE:CV > RE0 > RE5 > shit

RE2 > REmake > 4 > 3 > 5 > quality drop > CV = 0 = RE = REV2

the rest is either boring shit or just plain bad to be mentioned

RE1 > REmake

There I said it.

She should be in porn she's so hot.

you said it, but everyone laughs at you

not him but 2 has four different campaings you can play trough instead of just 2 in the REmake

RE > REmake > RE3 > RE 2

Revelations 2 has the best gameplay

I think we can all agree on that

REmake is a tad overrated. Still amazing but 1 and 2 are better then it by a hair.

>1 is better
>1 is better
>1 is better
>The same game where there is literally no atmosphere

I bet you only like it because of the live action cutscenes

not just that, but it's a more intense game overal with better pacing

REmake literally improves on the original game in every possible way, reducing it to a mere curiousity

It's the pacing I prefer in RE. REmake feels so slow to play. There's also something really charming about RE's graphics as opposed to REmake's more realistic/atmospheric visual design.

howd you get this picture of me

And 6 has three, does that make it better than REmake?

>Zero over RE4
Are you fucking kidding me?

>The same game where there is literally no atmosphere
What a fucking retard you are.
>REmake literally improves on the original game in every possible way, reducing it to a mere curiousity
This is completely untrue. Even if it was true there is always a reason to play the original games because they will usually have many things of interest about them besides just gameplay reasons. So never mind about what I said since you are wrong.

Why are you comparing two completely different types of games?

>This is completely untrue.
How?

>Everything is lit like a christmas tree
>atmosphere

>Are you fucking kidding me?

RE4 destroyed everything with the Action shit.

1 is very different from REmake. Even if REmake was a literal 100% remake of the first game only with improved graphics there would still be a reason to play the original and that's because it's the fucking original game don't be a massive faggot.

REmake is different enough that it should always be seperated from the original. Which btw started the franchise and sold a ton of copies.

was a good action game anyways.

>thinking lighting is the only thing that gives atmosphere

You don't even know what the fuck you are talking about so shaddap.

But it wasnt Resident Evil anymore.

Why is RE2 so overhyped? It's short, boring, has garbage late game zones, shit bosses, may too much ammos, and so forth

Mein negra, Regina is top waifu

Because it's so super scary when you can see enroaching horror

WHY AREN'T ANY OF THE ZOMBIES GRABBING HER TITS?!

RE2>REmake>RE4>RECV>RE0>RE>RE3>RE5>RE6>REV>REV2

>tfw re264 is coming in the mail this week

It's been too long old friend

Silent Hill > Resident Evil

who gives a shit? zero isnt a very good game regardless of being an RE game or not.

I can say the same thing about any other series with a game that is more highly regarded than the others.

3 already started the action stuff, so I don't get your point. Zero just isn't a good game. The story is shit, the voice acting is shit, the co-op shit was annoying, and it gave you WAY too much ammo. More so than RE4. The only thing about the game is the Leechman

>3 already started the action stuff
It was also the scariest anyway. That was good balance

>It's short
So? You had 4 different campaigns with tons of extra modes and easter eggs which increases the replay value by a fuck ton.
Short game with great extra content and replay value > Long game with no replay value and next to no extra content
>boring
Subjective.
>has garbage late game zones
I disagree.
>shit bosses
Better than RE1's at least.
>may too much ammos
I agree.

biohazard 0 HD REMASTER > Everything else

entirely subjective

and also I don't agree, for me it was one of the least scary games in the series. It was ocassionally exciting while the nemesis was on your tail, but otherwise it was very much an action game with very little tension going on

Thats

RE0=RE:CV > RE 1 > RE 4 = RE2 > rest are shit

The entire first part of the game had very few zombies. There was only a LOT of them when they did appear and coupled with Nemesis, made for for a very interesting and scary game I think. At least more than RE2.

>RE0 >

your taste makes for a shit jill sandwich

I knew Sup Forums was fucking baby tier but okay

The real list you plebs:

Outbreak File #1, Outbreak File #2 > RE1 , RE2, RE3 > RE4 > RE0 > Everything else

...

DMC3>DMC1>DMC4>DMC2>UNDERTALE>DmC>MINECRAFT>RE2>REmake>RE:CV>RE3>RE0>RE4>RE:R2>RE:R>RE5>RE6

RE3 > the rest

Oh, poor shitposter. You seem to be in a need. Here.

I never played Outbreak. What's so good about them?

Classic RE gameplay, improved and online. What's not to love?. There was rumors about they being remade, sadly they seem to be fake.

Lmao reddit as fuck detected

Its gonna happen senpai, not a remake but a remaster probably

Capcom love milking RE with ports