They use this video as proof
youtube.com
) You should never trust anyone who calls himself "a cynical person"
2) the british retard spend 7,5 minutes talking about simple options such as sound,brightness and controls
3) His argument is that the textures are not good enough for 35 price tag
4) he spend 20 minutes talking about 35 dollars price tag and menus
Are you people really autistic to the point of thinking he proved the anniversary HD is bad?
Fable Anniversary is bad though senpai
Why?
Fable was never good to begin with
I played anniversary and don't remember anything that bad about it.
shut your lying jewish mouth
All I remember about anniversary is that fucking stuttering every 30 seconds.
I liked the original fable when it first came out.
I feel like a lot of the shade it gets is from people just now playing it for the first time.
Not all games age well. It doesn't mean it wasn't good for its time, though.
>any price above 5€
>game looks like a nintendo64 game
It's not above 5 though?
It was $30 when it came out which was fucking ridiculous.
For $5 it's probably fine.
I'll take low-poly over uncanny valley any day.
>didnt get any (you)'s
>makes a new thread
Underage neo Sup Forums everyone.
should games be reviewed based on price?
Who is retard enough to pay anything over 25 dollars for a video game?
No
you first shut your jewish mouth and go back to nintendogaf
>anniversary is 5 dollars
>the original is 10 dollars
they know
>should games be reviewed based on price?
why not? its an important consideration when looking at any purchase. you're not going to buy a small family sedan for the same price as a fancy sports car
>should games be reviewed based on price?
That's a good question, actually.
If Pokemon Ruby costed $40 but Pokemon Sapphire costed $10, would Pokemon Sapphire actually be a better game? Would its lower price deserve mention in the review, or impact on the reviewers opinion?
>trying to shill a shit game on two different threads
>calls others jews
1) comparing cars to games
2) not buying used games or games on sale and never for the full price
It's funny because the reviewer always get the money for free and gifts from the publisher
Because I want to understand why people here suck the cynical british cock that hard
It's not normal.
Specially in that fable review where he spent 20 minutes talking about menus and mouse options
if something is a really good game but is priced at a million dollars and is behind 20 layers of denuvo, does it really matter if its good or not?
No game other than CoD+DLC costs more than 59 USD
you're not very good at this, are you? most people can't buy every single 60 dollar game that comes out in a year, so they're going to take the price and quality into account each time
>not buying used games or games on sale and never for the full price
So you're taking the game's price into consideration?
>It's funny because the reviewer always get the money for free and gifts from the publisher
Way to miss the point you fucking idiot.
You still can't play as a girl and that triggers me
it has better models and textures but is completely inferior in the end so it doesn't matter
removing hero saves and adding that awful console menu was their biggest mistake
>didnt play The Lost Chapters
>thinks people play games because of looks
>pretends the "remake" doesnt have any problems
>shilling a shit game FOR FREE
>thinks people base their opinions solely on youtube videos
>also underage
The only thing Anniversary does is highlight how weak a game Fable was.
Fable is an exercise in populating a game with as many missed opportunities as possible.
What people should do is:
wait for 12 months for a good deal or buy used
>So you're taking the game's price into consideration?
Sure I do but not if I was responsible for giving it scores (a.k.a journalist prostitute
>>thinks people base their opinions solely on youtube videos
You just admired that the only source of information about Fablo Anniversary is that retarded video by the british cuck
You fucking admitted.
Can someone actually tell me why the game is bad without the mention of memes, shorthanded greentext or keyboard and mouse controls? I haven't played TLC in a long time and for 5 bucks this interested me.
unless the game is complete shit, a used copy is only cost a couple dollars less. this isn't 2004 anymore
Ok, pirate as a way of trying it for yourself (''illegal'' trial) and if it's good buy it or wait for a steam sale
Its old and outdated, if you don't have a huge nostalgia boner for Fable you won't like it.
You probably won't like it even if you do
I would understand if he was talking about fable 2. But this is fable 1, fable 2 is just better in every way. dont waste your time with an objectively worse game.
Fable 2 was most definitely not better. It was a pretty good game though.
i played fable on the PC and wasn;'t really a massive PC gamer then. I remember it being a good game and visually nice, but it's not a game to return to.
> fable 2 is just better in every way
>no mouse in menus
>graphics still looks like shit
>performance issues
>modding tool is worthless
>combat is still dogshit
>multiple actions bound to single button
i bought that piece of shit 4 days ago and refunded after 20min.
I hate TB since he got cancer he became a prick but in this video he got valid point that fable remaster is a rip off.
I'm replaying Lost Chapters right now and I still enjoy it, as I did when it first released in 2004. I think that people who have never played it ever would prefer the remake since it's "prettier" and has lots of small fixes.
Play whichevee one you want, I still recommend the game since I really enjoy it.
Graphics aren't everything, user.
>should games be reviewed based on price?
shit mate im on the wrong site, i get all my games free
Not everyone is Quinn who is willing to suck any dick for a piece of plastic or a digital key
I replayed it using the anniversary edition and it worked well and looked pretty nice. Installed the old edition to compare and i don't understand people who claim that the old one looks better.
Fable is fantastic with that whole "no upgrades, potions and legendaries" playthrough, its a whole different game, and yea its kindof weak otherwise, but Fable 2 is just so flaccid and weak its not even comparable, you literally cannot die in the game, this is a real thing in the game, when you run out of health you drop your XP and get back up.
Question from someone not living in America: Are 5 dollars too much money to pay for a video game? I'm asking because I've seen many posts about people hesitating to pay that much money, and from the outside, it does not really seem to be really much.
You need to consider that this site is literally full of children who only have so much pocketmoney to spend.
>t. 40 year old man
How is it outdated again? Because it's not Skyrim/Fallout 3-4?
Bing bong boom
Fable 2 was objectively better in every single way, but Fable 1 nostalgiashitters don't seem to like it for some reason.
The game's mediocre with one of the most disgustingly ulgy looking character designs.
What if I told you there's a game on steam right now, with 42% positive reviews, only because it's overpriced for what it offers.
That very game is 90% off.
I do agree price matters, but should your review be based on it?
>PC will never get a Fable II port
Does anyone have actual arguments against it? I've been getting the itch to give Fable another try and don't know if it should be Anniversary or original. As long as the autumnal forest still looks hot I'm keen on A.
They're both fine man, played both of them and only thing I don't like is that they use Jacks lost chapters voice in anniversary.
Anniversary looks pretty good imo but the one thing I can't stand is the way they changed the MC's face and some of the beard/hairstyle options. Looks worse in every way than the original and I could not find a combination that didn't look retarded and was pretty much forced to wear a helmet the whole game.
Ha. But still. I watch US series, and 5 dollars seem something that your mom would give you without thinking.
Kill yourself, Mr XBob.
The problem with anniversary is that whenit came out it was an incredibly lazy port. It had all sorts of performance issues and crashed often. Getting keyboard/mouse support was also a hassle.
Not sure if they fixed the tech issues, but if they did it's probably decent. I played through on 360 and it was fine little update. Some of the new model decisions were a bit strange or felt out of place, but otherwise okay.
The one big complaint I haveis that it had day-one DLC instead of all being included. There's no excuse for that shit especially when it's just an HD upgrade to an exising game. I just ignored the DLC.