What did they mean by this?
What did they mean by this?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtu.be
youtube.com
twitter.com
You're doing that wrong.
>seriously trying to shitpost this masterpiece
sorry it singlehandedly won E3, faggot
Looks like a severe case of "it's ok when Sony does it".
name a single game in the last 5 years that hasn't done this
Is it legal?
who has the webm of everyone running to the nintendo e3 booth on the last day?
Wonderful 101 improved in quality since it was announced and when it was released.
I can name games that despite doing it still looked damn close
Witcher 3 despite retard outcry looked very close to bull shots, and it in no way suffered from good visuals despite nintendrones claiming so
Wii U is a disgrace console and this game honestly looks oblivion tier visual tech vise, like this was possible on ps3 with less draw distance of course, but still
Nintendo has been doing this fucking shit with the Zelda franchise since the fucking 64DD.
When they pulled that shit during the reveal of the GC demo of zelda then released WW later...
That was quite honestly the last straw.
From that point on the Zelda franchise has nearly quartered it's fanbase and sales with every fucking release.
Skyrim looked surprisingly same to its e3 gameplay demo.
Xenoblade X
Aho! Hoho! Quite frankly I can not fathome why Nintendo would bother bringing this game into existance in this poor sub-quality state! Positivley dreadful. Ho, For it is simply uncouthe and I wish them the very worst! I shall be remouving my pre-order post haste! But the joke's on them, lads...I never even owned a pii you! Hoho!
Wolfenstein TNO
Didn't mean to offend you, peasant.
>and it in no way suffered from good visuals despite nintendrones claiming so
What? Nintendrones don't claim this. Most of them own gaming computers.
Mario Kart 8
>neither side's footage is labeled "final release"
You were so close
>nintendrones literally defend only getting one single player game a year
why do you do it?
>Is it legal?
yes because its a work in progress and not toted as final, so they can flat out lie about graphics.
dark souls 2's demo having better graphics than the released version probably isn't though
the downgrade is like abnormally bad.
Rise of the Tomb Raider
What? It's fucking bullshit to release so few games a year while also having abysmal third party relations. Breath of the Wild also looks really, really good. 2 completely unrelated things, Nintendo sucks but the game looks great.
Man. That HUD is fucking AWFUL. It literally been slapped together in ten minutes. Being minimalistic doesn't mean it can have some sort of border or small effect over it.
ALBW
You're not witty. Just putting that out there.
Thanks for the (you) though
Halo 5
the advertisements lied about many things, but not the graphics
Why do you post this photoshopped mess repeatedly mutliple times per day?
I can hardly tell the difference.
that's literally the last thing they work on. I remember how ugly TLOU's was too until the very end.
I swear to god, it's fucking battered wives syndrome at this point.
E3 2015: Nintendo fans on suicide watch for the worst showing in history
E3 2016: No announcement of new system, no exciting new content for existing IPs, just Amiibos, and footage of a Zelda game that was supposed to come out this year. Fans suddenly cocky.
People wonder why Nintendo doesn't try harder. You're the reason, bud.
Difference is Uncharted 4 still looks good.
>graphics whores
Who cares about graphics, its gameplay that matters and Zelda has always had shit gameplay so who cares about how the graphics look like.
THIS
These
The above mentioned
Post the funnier shop
bottom is better. more personality.
Bayonetta 2
Are people seriously pretending that there is actually grass in the distance there in the first screen? Seriously, it's fucking obvious that the grass just vanishes at certain point and everything looks like clay from then on. And the camera is at a low angle, so the grass that the close grass distracts ytou from the uglyness in the distance.
They fucking played you like a damn fiddle with that first screen and now you complaining that they don't fiddle you some more.
Fucking good goy fags
Zelda was easily the best thing at E3 this year. Everything else was non playable gameplay teasers or pretty normal stuff.
Isn't the top image just a promo render? Are people seriously trying to cause a riot with something we knew Nintendo would never be able to achieve on current hardware.
So far I think the game looks fine. I'll complain if there's frequent framerate dips or something actually worth bitching about.
>he hasn't seen the webm of Link hang gliding with massive pop-in issues or the 20fps
>as if open world games released on better hardware don't have pop in
At this point I'm not even surprised when pop in occurs. Granted I know the webm you're talking about and yeah the gliding looks slow as balls, but they still have 7/8 months to iron that out. They probably won't.
>pop ins
>in wii u
>Isn't the top image just a promo render?
No. The top image is a literal photoshop.
Top image is a shop. Game still doesn't look as good as the "gameplay" they showed before though.
Anything goes, when you have an army of brainwashed fans who will not only shut up about any flaws, but also silence everyone else and buy it anyway.
...
zelda is still causing butthurt? Nice
Star Wars: Battlefront
ArmA III
nice try
youtube.com
>not posting the real version
Where is the footage that is no streamed?
The colors are better in that
>Sup Forums will insist the E3 one is better
This place is a shithole
I'm gonna try and stop that shitposting falacy even though it's probably useless cause shitposters are still shitposters and the E3 demo still has caused massive butthurt.
Resolution aside, it's the same game.
>The assets are the same
>The textures are the same
>The models are the same
>The limitiations are the same
It's just that the trailer from E314 was cherrypicked as fuck by nintendo.
>The camera is tilted so you can see sharp blades of grass the closest, ignoring how it disappears in the distance due to draw distance
>There's barely any close mountain to critizise the rock textures. The few rocks in there look just as bad as the ones in the demo, it's just that there are few of them, and it's not zoomed in like fuck.
>In the top picture you can't complain about copypasted trees because there are barely any close to the viewer but you can still see that copypasted mess of a forest in the distance, which is the fucking same people is complaining about right now.
If you were not a moron about it you would know that the game would probably not look so nice EVERYWHERE, from EVERY SINGLE POINT OF VIEW, like a high place in a temple tower from where drawdistance of the grass is gone.
The game still looks good in aesthetic terms and the gameplay was full of both tiny and huge delicious features and details that make a difference with most stuff showed in E316. It's not rocket science why people is excited and why it was successful.
We can only hope that the game keeps the bar of surprises and details this high throughout the whole of it.
They meant that consoles are inferior to PC's and they use PC's to trick, deceive and lie to gullible console peasants who will eat that shit up every single time.
Consoles are indivisible with deception.
>Sonyggers still THIS mad
can't you guys just let go
Yeah well it's easy when you got only one game showcased, people just wanted to try the only nintendo game of this E3.
Look at those pathetic fucking losers.
>nintendo makes a shit looking game
Color me surprised
>Yeah well that's easy
No it's not. If they only showed color splash and the rest of the shit they announced nobody would have given 2 shits.
>implying it was hard 'winning' that shitfest
I really believe that Zelda BotW wipl be great. I really do. But holy shit, how can ANYONE defend those fucking graphics? Seriously, have you guys seen the pop-in in the gameplay videos? It's fucking ridiculous.
Dunno, it wasn't much worse than Dawn Horizon's.