Which one?

Which one?

Cancer can kiss my arse

Either one would inevitably create worse problems in the future, neither

>Cure cancer
>Lasts forever

>Feed hungry
>They're hungry again the next day

you are verysmart

>choose "cure cancer"
>this thread stops getting posted
Wow.

Both are shit options

Why cant er just purge the hungry and those with cancer?

Hunger is about distribution of food, not a lack of it, whereas cancer comprises a ton of different diseases with different causes, treatments, and treatability. It also presents a huge strain on health care costs.

You're just pissy because if someone cured cancer you would ceased from existence.

>cure cancer
>not enough food to feed the previously infirmed

>cure hunger
>even more people have diseases