Which one?
Which one?
Cancer can kiss my arse
Either one would inevitably create worse problems in the future, neither
>Cure cancer
>Lasts forever
>Feed hungry
>They're hungry again the next day
you are verysmart
>choose "cure cancer"
>this thread stops getting posted
Wow.
Both are shit options
Why cant er just purge the hungry and those with cancer?
Hunger is about distribution of food, not a lack of it, whereas cancer comprises a ton of different diseases with different causes, treatments, and treatability. It also presents a huge strain on health care costs.
You're just pissy because if someone cured cancer you would ceased from existence.
>cure cancer
>not enough food to feed the previously infirmed
>cure hunger
>even more people have diseases