In a free-for-all fight between every main character of their respective Assassin's Creed game...

In a free-for-all fight between every main character of their respective Assassin's Creed game, which assassin would come out on top?

They may have:
Their hidden blade.
Their main melee weapon.
Their main side weapon.

Probably Ezio. Connor and Adewale are strong contenders, though.

>fucking Nikolai in this picture
Why use him in the promotional AC shit, but only have his character (and Shao Jun) in side games?

Also, Liberation sequel when?

probably edward kenway, 4 guns, 2 swords and veteran at actually fighting.

Conor was the best fighter easily. The shittiest assassin but downright the best all-round fighter

Fuck off. OP never stated that guns were in play.

Also, Edward is a pirate turned Assassin. He's probably the weakest of the group, after Arno and the Frye twins.

the one beside the girl in the image
he would outjew the rest somehow

op said their main melee and side weapons, which for edward was 2 swords and 4 guns
in contrast ezios was a sword and a small dagger
edward actaully knows how to fight, he was boarding ships as a privateer and a pirate, that is no easy feat. again in contrast ezio was stealth killing italian renaissance guards/police and turkish mudslimes.
pretty chilled out times in history irl, I wouldn't expect much great battles amonst his enemies.

Get off of Edward's dick. He was a shit character in a shit game. Hell, he wasn't even an assassin for most of it

Well, the rogues dude sole purpose was killing other assassins so probably him.

>stealth killing
Except the times when he all-out swordfought with them.

If anything, Edward using his pistols would be the cheap route.

Also, buy this logic, Adewale would be a better fighter.

Idgaf about edward hes not even my fav character or ebin in my fave game of the series 3 is my fav in the series
just being logical in dangerous times in human history and location they operated in the top 3 in declining order would be altiar, edward then conner.
edward would win because he is just as battle hardened but has 2 swords and 4 guns, as well as all the side weapons the rest has

Shay would definitely be able to kill most, if not all, of the Assassins in OP's pic. The only one I'd think would cause him trouble is Ezio.

They all the same nigga.

Adewale has a fucking blunderbuss and has trained with the Assassins, unlike Edward.

Definitely not.

Arno and Edward never even fucking trained., while Jacob and Evie have limited combat options.

Who is the jew second last on the right?
He already won.

Enzo probably. He's pretty much the quintessential assassin.

I only ever played the first two games but wasn't Altair supposed to be this super omega badass that was formally trained as an Assassin and killed a guy who had an OP godlike power giving artifact? Why do people say Ezio would win? All he did was fight and fail to kill a fat faggot while he had the help of said previous OP God giving artifact.

Altair, Ezio, and Nikolai were all Master Assassins.

Whoever was active during the period of time where the weapons are most advanced...so I think the AC3 guy

Connor, he's fucking savage.

So is Adewale.

Wouldn't that be the Frye twins?

That's some dumb logic

>going by setting instead of skill
Fucking retard.

>Fight
Connor or Edward.
>Assassination.
Ezio or Altair.

Jesus fucking Christ, how many goddamned AC games are there now? It feels like three come out at once every year.

Why Edward? Did you play Rogue and Freedom Cry?

Not enough to get through this year. ;_;

I waited until last year to buy Brotherhood, Revelations, III, Liberation, and Rogue.

I still haven't finished China either.

When the fuck are you in China?

Shit 2D game.

It's the best of the three shit games, though. And it's better than nothing.

>wasting 2 amazing settings and characters on short 2D games
>The next game is supposedly set in Egypt - a setting that was previously described as "one of the worst locations for an Assassin's Creed game"
>Feudal Japan is still off limits, apparently
Someone just end it.

What's so bad about Egypt?

They could just use those settings in a different time period. That's exactly what they're with fucking Rome in like 2021

My guess is the lack of tall buildings to climb on.

>That's exactly what they're with fucking Rome in like 2021
What?

Who would want to play in any time period but Ancient Egypt for its setting?

I probably would desu

didn't stop them with 3

Didn't stop 4 and Rogue from being good, also I they'll be good. Ancient let's there be a lot more leeway to do what you want

>Didn't stop 4 and Rogue from being good
>4 and Rogue from being good
>4
>good
Kill yourself. Black Flag is only looked upon fondly because it's like the only pirate game on console.

It's a shit game - even when you cut the Assassin shit out. I cannot tell you how many times Edward sperged the fuck out when on the deck of a ship, jumped when/where I didn't want him to, and didn't attack enemy crew members because the his dumbass allies were getting in the way mid-combo.

>let's there be

There's no hope for Ubisoft making a good game anymore. (See: AC Unity, Syndicate, Far Cry 4 and Primal, and Watch Dogs 2)

Shit thread, OP. I'm sure the fucking autism threads are cutting down on traffic to this one, but still.

To be fair, that last issue is also present in Rogue.

"To say that nothing is true, is to realize that the foundations of society are fragile, and that we must be the shepherds of our own civilization.

To say that everything is permitted,
is to understand that we are the architects of our actions, and that we must live with their consequences, whether glorious or tragic."

Rogue was waaaaaay more interesting and fun than Black Flag.

The main character didn't give a fuck about the Assassins for 75% of the game.

Rogue had a much more interesting story/plot/narrative.

I agree. I'm just saying that taking over ships was often a clusterfuck.

Probably Connor, that guy got up from everything

If motivated, Connor or Shay.

Ezio's Brotherhood robes are so great from the waist up.

>implying skill of combat is not acquired through experience
fucking retarded

Do any of the recent assassin's creed games have decent multiplayer? Brotherhood's online was some of the most fun I had on console, but I remember them fucking things up in the proceeding game.

Unity is literally named after its multiplayer concept.
Connor hands down.
>strongest
>most skilled
>mentally the most resilient
>physically the most resilient
>inhuman endurance (comes with being a native American)
>can be stealthy in the woods and in cities
>most unique weapons (I think all the other assassins had swords or daggers,except for one or two)

>>most skilled
skilled as in he became a master at age 30.
The others who became masters were well into their 50s and 60s namely Ezio and Altair.

That's not the same argument.

setting =/= skill
setting =/= experience

Ezio, he's literally grandmaster level, Altair lacks better equipment.

IV's is a frustrating grindfest.

If preptime, Altair.

If you just throw them on a pit, Connor by a mile. His fighting style was so fucking agressive and he can fuck people up with practically everything. His animations are the best the whole saga has gotten and I can't understand how they actually toned it down in subsequent games

Have you not seen Adewale's combat style?

>canonically fucked in the ass by a rogue young Assassin

He was 66 years old then.

Which game has an active multiplayer?

I know III and IV do, but IV's is a grind and both usually just have people running on rooftops instead of being stealthy.