Civ 6

Pre-order Civ 6 or you'll have to wait until January to play as the Aztecs

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=JopItGJ2Gpo
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

new Montezuma looks frail

>buying a firaxis game before the xpacs that fix the game

It's of course wise to approach the game with caution and a healthy dose of scepticism, but this time it seems to have virtually all features of its predecessor (ie. Brave New World) at launch so I think it's possible things might be different this time.

Just when I thought they couldn't make their DLC model more scummy

He was frail. It's weird how the Aztecs are represented by Montezuma considering he was a spineless ruler who let Cortez trample all over him before dying of a rock thrown by his own angry people.

>it's possible things might be different this time.
Not once has this been true, ever.

>The last 3 times have been horseshit
>BUT THIS TIME IT WILL BE OK. I CAN FEEL IT.

No you ignorant nigger. They sealed their own fate with their shitty business practices. Never buy a Civ game until all the xpacs are out.

Montezuma of the Aztecs unveiled for Civ VI (bonus for those who preorder the game, will become available for everyone else ninety days after release).

Aztec Ability: Builders may be used to rush the construction of Districts.
Leader Ability: Gifts for the Tlatoani - Luxuries give amenities to extra cities, each individual luxury gives additional military power.
Unique Unit - Eagle Warrior - Replaces the standard warrior, but can turn defeated non-Barbarian enemies into Builder units.
Unique Infrastructure - Tlachtli - In the Entertainment District. Gives amenities, faith, and Great General Points.

It's Montezuma I, not Montezuma II.

>Love playing Civ multiplayer
>tfw will have no friends to play Civ 6 with

I'm Mexican and why don't we have more Aztecs in videogames?

Just pre-order the game. What's the big deal? If you plan on buying it anyway just pay for it literally one day prior and it's all good

...

baka

Smashing babies on a slab of stone is generally frowned upon

>it's a Montezuma and Attila both spawn near you episode

FOR PUSSIES MAYBE

>paying for a civ game, which is typically the same shit from the last game, completely iterative and unoriginal with a few added features
If you do this you are a cuck that wants devs to keep making boring, iterative shit.

Because it will be a shit game on launch, and will be a pretty decent game around the 2nd DLC.

Just like CIV5 was, and just like Beyond Earth is.

It's a nice civ fun fact:
I-IV: Montezuma II
V and VI: Montezuma I

Can you imagine the uproar if they completely changed how the game worked? There is a player base that will play anything civ devs throw at them.

>or you'll have to wait until January to play as the Aztecs
wanna bet?

What is the reason of delay?

shekels

Creating a pre-order incentive.

Holy shit its NOT a Montezuma does nothing but put the person he spawns next to behind by spamming jaguar faggots become irrelevant because he has no traits of worth beyond turn 10 then die by warmongering with a vastly bigger civ episode.

That's a pleasent change.

Reminder of the leaders revealed thus far.

Which four do YOU think will be preorder bonuses?

What delay? When was it supposed to come out and when is it coming out now?

Why does he look like a white old man?

Will gandhi love nukes in civ 6?

I don't want to play another civ game ever.

>catherine de medici
wat?

we gonna play as florence?

If you don't pre-order you won't be allowed to use the Aztecs until January.

Or you can just pirate it day 1 ;)

She's the French leader, probably with a heavy Culture/Tourism focus to reflect her impact on European art.

Russia not lead by Catherine? That can't be true.

>things might be different this time
you sound like a battered spouse

Yea ok that was clear from the rest of the thread but really had nothing to do with my question.

WHY BARBAROSSA REEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>yfw i mod in all the abilities from 6 into 5
does this mean I am essentially pirating 6

the delay meant the delay of the aztecs, not a delay of the game

>old fritz

otto or bust

why no Ivan the Terrible?
he expanded Russia to the pacific

B-but muh strong womyn?

Has Civ used leaders that were insane before?

I wonder if Firaxis will actually allow modded multiplayer.

How fucking hard could it be.

Maria the Mad for Portugal?

O I see. Thanks for the clarification.

They made up for it by giving the Poles a female leader.

How come they avoid making him look Aztec?

why is he green?

Why wouldn't he be?

>shit game on launch

If you think BNW CiV is good, then Civ 6 is good Vanilla. It's BNW build on a new engine with more stuff.

>all this upselling

Calm down shill. If everything is what you claim, the suckers you reel in will be happy to say so once they've played it.

The fact that you are trying so hard to convince everyone now just casts doubt over everything you claim.

well by that time monty will be unlocked for everyone so its all a moot point

>someone says something positive about a game, they mush be a shill

Nigga, whats wrong with you? All I said is that if you think BNW is good, than Civ6 is good, because if you've watch or read any of the info on the game, it's literally just BNW on a new engine with some changes, like districts, army corp creation, and more unqiue shit per civ, and that's it.

>play Civ III
>Rome and America are among the first AIs to get conquered by other civs in every game
>mfw

Why would you play as anybody but Gilgamesh? He's 1/3 god. It's not even possible to be 1/3 anything, but he is.

Yeah, all of them in Civ 5 as far as the AI is concerned.

>Those shit-eating grins they always made
Civ 1 and 2 had that charm the later installments missed.

>Shaka, Ashurbanipal, Attila, Genghis Khan and Alexander on the same continent

That's been confirmed since the start?

Of course.

Why are mongols there?

Advisor look was tied to your government type. You always got mongols if you ran despotism.

Did Aztecs have facial hair? I thought most Native American peoples didn't do that

>genocidal bitch as French leader

even lizzy is only a good leader because she controlled the weather and sunk the Spanish armada.

Pericles and Gilgamesh. At last a Civ game with leaders I actually want to play as again.

You triggered my autism, and now I had to do a mathematical proof to show that you can be 1/3 of something.

Here goes :
4 original ethnicity (doesn't apply in the case of gilgamesh, since there's only 2 : god and human, but it applies for regular, real world scenarios). Pure, X, Y, Z and K

The possible ethnicity mix from any of those is 50% of either or pure. It's then possible to obtain an offspring that is 50% of one and 25% of two others, or an offspring that's 25% of each by coupling two people of completely different ethnicity. For instance, if a 50% X and 50% Y individual copulates with a 50% Y and 50% K individual, you get 25% X, 25% K and 50% Y.

Breed a 25% XYZK with a 50% Z 25% Y 25% K, both of which are possible, together and you'd get : 12,5% X 37,5% Z 25% Y 25% K

Then you take the previous 25% X, 25% K and 50% Y and breed it with the 12,5% X, 37,5% Z, 25% Y, 25% K and you finally obtain :

0,16666% X, 25% Z, 33,3333% Y and 25% K.

Hence after 4 generations, you'd get an individual that's 1/3 Y.

Fuck you for triggering me.

Small mistake, the last individual is 16,6666% X, not 0,16666% X.

Except it was because his dad and a god ran the train on his mother you faggot

Which only happens in fiction you retard, you can't have one egg fertilized by two different sperms from two different people in real life. There's probably some extreme fringe case where it happened but that's not how biology works in the overwhelming majority of the time.

>mfw civ 5 is too complex for me
any games for retards

Actually the Y at the end is 37.5. What the fuck are you smoking?

>he doesn't like music in horror games
youtube.com/watch?v=JopItGJ2Gpo

Civ Revolution