What if Zelda graphics are shit that looks like a 2008 release because NX is portable?

it makes sense
slightly more powerful than Wii U

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=BPjgEPQzl7c
youtube.com/watch?v=VE2Dc1sx71U
youtube.com/watch?v=RIa79bTDuV4
youtube.com/watch?v=ElnSg6oMcZc
youtube.com/watch?v=PLgSo90JhAQ
youtube.com/watch?v=yWZxH2qSWu0
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A3D
youtube.com/watch?v=HzZEAvvSzt0
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

my iphone has better graphics than both of these

2006 Xbox 360 has better graphics than wii u so what?

The 2014 trailer you're moaning about was featured in the extended trailer so there's nothing to worry about. Do your research next time.

youtube.com/watch?v=BPjgEPQzl7c

Next time post the video from the source feed not a 10 dollar camera filming it

Thanks

There won't be a next time.

Then what are you doing in this thread? posting 10 bucks camera capture because.... ?

Trolling you.

And because I feel it.

85% of this trailer was already released before

there is nothing new to see, retard.

typical redditor hipster

I think you are the retard.

MUH UNRELEASED ZELDA TRAILERRR

In smooth 28fps

to anyone who thinks this tech demo is an acceptable video game.
please watch any trailer for any other game and then tell me how walking around an empty field with the exact same 2 enemies every once in a while is acceptable.
youtube.com/watch?v=VE2Dc1sx71U

>Tech demo vs actual gameplay
youtube.com/watch?v=RIa79bTDuV4

There is no difference from the tech demo and the actual game released 1,4 year later

on the other hand Breath of the Wild is a major downgrade

C-could 2014 be NX?

because that 2000 demo has no gameplay

I was talking about this

Apologize

Fog N64: The Game

Holy cow. I can see why they call it openair now. That has to be the highest altitude in any video game.

I mean realistic that is. Most games just pull you straight down like a bag of bricks to cut spatial distance.

This game looks so good and I'll buy it and all. It's just I have no hype for it, Mainly because I'm so old and I wanted to move on with my live.

You feel?

ur easily impressed
1999 verticality lmao

you are saying you don't want to spend 399 for a mobile "video game"? buy wii u used

>downgrade meme

Thanks you for proving my point.

I already -have- a wiiU.

That hell is that supposed to show? That doesn't even have anything comparable to those distances and isn't open world anyway.

(You)

Anyone developer can code mountains with 3 polygons an d last generation resolution texture with huge space them apart.

I honestly dont get the amazement Nintendo fans have for this game, it's like they don't play any other video games other than Nintendo games and become amazed when they do what the industry did years ago.

its pretty fucking tall
excuse me if its not immediately visible from that vantage point

I love Unreal man, I think it's one of the greatest adventure video games ever created, but this is a piss-poor comparison.

It just might be. Though Crysis if memory serves had a pretty much infinite altitude if you used the editor to fly higher and higher. But indeed that webm is the first I've ever seen to incorporate it into organic gameplay. The problem is it's not visually impressive or exciting from a gameplay perspective. Maybe it'll be more enthralling to play though.

C'mon man. You're selling Unreal the wrong ways.

name one game with a world as large that isn't procedurally generated, user

>I honestly dont get the amazement Nintendo fans have for this game, it's like they don't play any other video games other than Nintendo games and become amazed when they do what the industry did years ago.

Because,
1. Brand name
2. Nintendo makes sure Zelda games have a good size budget.

>C'mon man. You're selling Unreal the wrong ways.
why, its got better graphics on 1999 tech than nintendo accomplished in 2017

>In b4 you eventually get the ability to straight up fly

meanwhile on the NX


hint: the NX's gimmick will involve integrating mobile gaming :^)

Unreal does have the best sound tech in any game to this day though.

youtube.com/watch?v=ElnSg6oMcZc

First off that's UT which was a marked improvement over Unreal in terms of graphics. Hell, UT isn't an open-world game. Neither is Unreal.

You don't sell a semi-linear adventure FPS to people who are talking about an open-world sword and magic adventure game by talking shit about the latter. Apples and oranges man. Hell, apples and cucumbers.

UT pretty close

youtube.com/watch?v=PLgSo90JhAQ

The actual design of the world now looks way better than it did in the old tech showcases.

For something I can do in Assassin's Creed games?

Not apologizing

so how do you rationalize Unreal (the original) having a better skybox in that pic than anything we've seen in BotW

You do understand what I was demonstrating with that clip right? Put on some headphones.

>people defending this
youtube.com/watch?v=yWZxH2qSWu0
i'll just leave this here

Do you unironically believes that this is the final product? Are you dense?

yeah that's what it is

Those skyboxes alone blow anything Nintendo could do the FUCK AWAY

literally all that is is point distance sounds and reverb zones
was there supposed to be something else on display

>show me a game with a bigger world
>right after I literally explain to you why scale is not at all impressive, ESPECIALLY in the case of Zelda U

While you might be amazed at how far developers can separate simple objects covered with massive fog in a 3 second webm you will eventually realize what an absolute bore and menial task it actually is navigate within the game.

Quality trumps quantity in an open world game. Unless Nintendo can create meaningful content and an environment that isn't as barebones as an N64 game you're going to have a bad time.

>Clouds moving at that speed

What the fuck is this thread?

Sonic 2017 isn't on a portable.

>dynamic weather

Yes, I unironically believe the quality we saw on the showroom will be almost exactly what we see in the final product. The graphics will not improve between now and then except for NX running it at slightly higher resolution with less slowdown. There will be no ansitropic filtering, no antialiasing, textures will still be garbage, trees will still be copy/pasted and perfectly vertical instead of anything like speedtree, and the distance will be horribly blurred and terrain will just pop-in left and right while you move even at moderate distances

none of that will change between now and release and you're delusional to think otherwise

Clouds would only ever move at that speed if there was a hurricane around and the trees are barely moving in this webm

Come on m8, Nintendo fucked up

>When she tries to look away after seeing seeing the pop in

All me ;)

I did this in far cry 4

>Clouds would only ever move at that speed
Check the time on the clock.

Yes.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A3D

bait

Looks about on par with Xeno X with foggier atmosphere.

delete this

Just Cause 2
Morrowind
A fuckton of other games also.

U just play Nintendo games so you probably never heard of em

Zelda U would've benefited immensely by sticking to a more linear stage design approach. The system is more than capable of delivering a nice and tight graphically impressive linear game but the open world is what fucked this game, It's too ambitious for it's own hardware capabilities and perhaps it was even an excuse to create a very simple game and to get away with it.

I cant see how they can release XCX and this in the same breath and not expect us to see the immediate fuckery that is going on

I'm not amazed, I'm just glad I have a game that's large enough for me to run around in and actually have to look for shit

it's cool that you suffer an attention defecit and need some sort of overbearing stimulus to distract you from how shot your life is though

why don't nintendo hire this guy to program their games?

youtube.com/watch?v=HzZEAvvSzt0

Is OP samefagging again?

We need IDs

>Zelda U would've benefited immensely by sticking to a more linear stage design approach.

Go back into your mum's cunt.

What the fuck is your point using the low quality stream when it is proven the actual game looks better?

Still nice to see salt coming back, though

I only posted 3 times (counting this one)
fuck you
it's not my problem if Nintendrones destroy the thread

>it's a shitposting zelda OP
Obviously. Just report it and talk about the game if that's what you want to do.

Lol

You started this bait thread, then complain when Shitposters invade?

1/10 bait

why are xenofags so deluded?

okay lets talk about how this game is fucking doomed whether or not the graphics are as shit as we've seen

...

Can we do it like how monster hunter does it?

Well, post

>expectations
>hopes
>what feature you are the most excited about
>what play style you would be using
>where it fits in the timeline
>would you buy the game?

Here's your (You).

Because that is merely a ego boost, not even a game

> Everything I dislike is bait
Bait thread?

It's not and obviously you know it's not but even if it was I would still be right complaining about Nintendrones

Nigger go jump off mt hyjal in wow and fall into winterspring. Wow has HUUUGE spacial distances and has the most realistic height for mountains in any game.

And without fucking fog everywhere hiding draw distance.

>flat landscape with some backdrop mountains
ok

Not him, but from what I understood of his argument is that there are few to no games with this level of verticality INTEGRATED TO THE TOPOGRAPHY.

Sure, anyone can make a very tall mountain or tower. But to have such a rich environment in terms of features that are not proceduraly generated in such a vast area is absolutely uncomon.

Just Cause is probably the closest, but it doesn't count being able to simply fly. The terrain is pretty boring overall, but I'll admit the mountain areas were kinda interesting, considering they were... well... mountains.

I can also think of minecraft, but that's proceduraly generated and the most potential comes from user created content. The more vertical biomes and features like extreme mountains and ravines were also susceptible to weird bugs and oddities in the generation.

Even if I find what they're doing in botw impressive, I will agree that most other people don't do it for design philosophy reasons, not lack of talent and certainly not for lack of tech.

Did you even played albws?

Even Mighty No 9 uses Unreal engine why nintendo don't use something good in their games?

What if you're comparing a crappy youtube screenshot against a promotional image created from a non-engine promotional video?

>he never played JC2

Those are not backdrop you can go there.
The map is fucking huge. And the terrain varies from snowy peaks to tropical beaches.

Go play some real games user.

This is a bait thread.

>expectations
Basically I want to do what you see in the trailers
>hopes
I want to fucking ride the flying rock
A flying mount, I don't care if it is a bird
More hidden bossess
Good dungeons with good music in them. Kickass boss themes
>feature I am most excited about
The shielding is cool, and I love the little details they put in like link stubbing his toe when kicking a chest. The statis spells are also interesting
>playstyle
Sword and shield. First play through explore, second go straight to boss
>timeline
Post-WW, I think
>will you buy
NX bundle.

Is THIS really the best shitposting image you have?

no i'm serious. every thread when someone's talking about something cool in a video game some retard show up and is like "um xenoblade did it better"

take your dead faced anime doll shit somewhere else.

>I'm not amazes
>''Holy cow. I can see why they call it openair now.''

>I'm just glad I have a game that's large enough for me to run around in and actually have to look for shit

Thousands of games already exist that allow you to do this and I just explained to you how boring it is in practice. You're basically glorifying fetch quests right now because you can't handle someone criticizing a never-been-done-before open world Nintendo game. You think you will enjoy endlessly charting baron plains but you won't.

Also this has nothing to do with having attention deficit disorder, there is nothing wrong with wanting higher quality content in a space that isn't arbitrarily huge for the sake of being huge. GTA V is a god like example of an open world sandbox done right, there is meaningful content tightly packed into a well planned world. Zelda is a sandbox in sandwhich where you need to bite through 10 layers of bread to find a slice of lettuce, and another 10 to get to the ham.

You dont know how menial this game will be to play but you will soon and hopefully wake up to then open world meme.

>crappy youtube screenshot

...

Have you actually seen the Zelda footage
There is a lot of stuff to find and even mini bossess in the overworld

>post another crappy Youtube screenshot

How weird that someone would compare a game known for its expansive landscapes with strong vertical elements on the same console with help from the same developers.
Faggot.

I knew it was bullshit and no Nintendo console could handle what they were showing. Nintendo fans are hardcore shit eaters in denial.

probably because they can make their own engine because they have competent employees and don't want to pay for something when they can make an engine specifically made for what they want to do