looks like shit
Looks like shit
Other urls found in this thread:
sv.wikipedia.org
youtube.com
twitter.com
looks pretty good
looks like both
>woman
>knight
It's boring. Has no depth. Rather play any other medieval type game
T. "Alpha" tester
The combat system could have been really fun if they made it much faster paced but instead its basically Assassins Combat stand and wait for an attack then hit back. And the fucking 'boss' fight at the end of that footage shows how fucking terrible it can be
What about Samurai vs Vikings vs Knights? How unrealistic isnt that?
>Has no depth.
you're just bad
I really hope they have an open beta for this. It looks cool, but I feel like I need to play it myself to get the feel of the game.
Even chiv has more ways to attack and it doesn't make you lock on. Game is shot and will be DLC ridden. Nobody will play this after a month
the combat looks like a shitty version of Niddhogg
>sjw shit
no thanks
Jean D'Arc was never a big fighter, it's just a fact, that in a messy bawl-like fight, like back in pre-gunpowder times women had no chance against men, due to their physical differences
I'm fine with female knights, but tbf it doesn't even seem Joan of Arc actually fought anyone, just boosted morale, saved someones life by warning them they were about to get shot, and got shot in the neck herself
that assumes the two battlers are of equal fitness, of which a male would have an advantage.
This seems like the kind of game that won't have an open beta. I kinda want it to be at least somewhat decent because I think it's a cool concept and other developers should try and have a go at it, but I'm worried the game might not be worth $60
Why would want to play this when actual skill based melee combat exists?
youtube.com
All that UI is missing is a Dew ad, then it will be 10/10
>First person shit
no thanks...i want to see my pimp knight fabulous fashion
not out
>Chivalry 2: Electric Boogaloo
Nah
But does it have samurais?