New Red Dead Announced

>New Red Dead Announced

>Three Protagonists

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=XP9cfQx2OZY
strawpoll.me/10911220
youtube.com/watch?v=LdLQf1Ef9Ns
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>One of the protagonists is chasing the other

>main protagonist is a strong independent black woman who has escaped slavery

ill cut you

>All three protagonists going after a hidden treasure

>Player gets to ultimately decide the outcome in a final showdown.

Y'know what?
Fuck GTA for this.

Because these faggots never kept MY CLOTHES on them.
>Swap off Franklin for 2 minutes
>Suddenly he's in a tanktop and fucking sweat pants
>Again
>Michael is now in sandals, shorts and his ugly shirt
>Again

Can you fuck off?

>One of them is a dog

Instant buy

So they'd make the main cast a reference to The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly? That's not a surprise.

Red Dead Redemption referenced High Noon, For a Few Dollars More, Today we kill Tomorrow we die, Magnificent Seven, the Cowboys, True Grit, Silverado, the Wild Bunch, Once Upon a Time in the West, and a few other films.

>Final showdown is and RNG cutscene
>10/10 ign/kotaku/polygon revolutionary narrative for a AAA title

Pls no.

Might be cool actually, if done well.
There we're a few notable black women in the old west, outlaws even.
Some native american (male or female) on some kind of revenge quest might be cool too. It really doesn't have to be the next Gruffy McCowboyton for the next protagonist.

...

seriously fucking stop faggots
DELETE THIS
R* might get ideas

but i don't want Django Unchained The Game. Not from Rockstar at least.

I want a RDR where you play as an indian
>bow & arrow
>tomahawk
>AC tier tree climbing

three character gimmick was the worst part of 5 I will drop RDR so hard if it has it and i had 600 hours collectively for revolver and redemption

Gun

Well shit, I'd play that. The feminists have been clamouring for a female protagonist for ages but truth be told, I'd be far more interested in playing a dog.

Make it a former confederate, a half white freeman with a penchant for bears, and a new york city Irishman who might as well be a jew on the railroad.

Temporarily play as a native that found Christ then lost Christ because everyone is fucking retarded and killing everyone.

Do you know why the NATIVE AMERICANS died?

Because guns are better than bows and arrows

To be honest I'd want a female protagonist if only for the fact that girls with rough southern accents get me instantly erect.

This is actually fucking amazing holy shit

i jet force Gemini you could play as a dog.

Final part of game is a standoff between the 3 protagonists like this scene
youtube.com/watch?v=XP9cfQx2OZY
Decisions made up to that point will decide who will die

Yeah, but bows are still cool.

Except you can't kill the black guy.

I hate to break this to you but most westerns don't take place in the south.

Colorado, Wyoming, Nebraska, Utah, Arizona, New Mexico are the usual settings for the western and most accents you hear are midwestern and not southern. West Texas is probably as far east as most go other than Missouri because Independence Missouri was the central hub for the railroads heading into the Union.

How in the fuck would you apply an RPG mechanic like RNG to a fucking action shooter?

The way the story is structured is that there are multiple "clashing point missions" throughout the main narrative which essentially add to the favor and overall likelyhood of each protagonist besting the other. The end is influenced by how the player resolves each clashing point., and how they decide to play that final mission.

shit.
she's hot.
more?

>two protagonists
>one, an outlaw on the lamb on a mission from god
>the other, a crooked marshal who thinks he's the boss of the whole west
>the marshal is trying to take down the outlaw but is almost always one step behind
>you switch between causing trouble as the outlaw and having to clean up the mess as the marshal

where would a new RDR even take place though, the last one was 1919, that's about the end of cowboy times.

I guess you could stick it in South America since it never really died out there even until today but I don't know if anyone would want that.

Maybe they could go full Jonah Hex and fill it with aliens and shit.

Post civil war is still the best option IMO. Playing as a vengeful slave would be cool.

I mean the showdown would literally be a random cut scene of one of the three guys winning.

>RNG is an RPG mechanic
You might be retarded. RNG is just "random number generator". You can find a use for a random number in any game.

You're a fucking retard.

Post civil war is one thing but using a former slave on a revenge quest is always going to be retarded in a western.

It can easily be set anywhere, not like it's hardcoded to be set only after Redemption, much less having to be connected in any serious way.

Personally, I wouldn't mind seeing them take on a more spaghetti western feel similar to what Revolver was, just more fleshed out and not as disjointed in what over-the-top things it chooses to do.

I would love for the next Red Dead to take place in the golden era of cowboys.

How about this?

How do you figure?

>Three characters from different backgrounds

>You play as the second character when he kills the first character

>You play as the third character when he kills the second character

A movie like "The Good the Bad and the Ugly" can almost be broken up into Vignettes. Instead of going for a traditional open world experience. A treasure hunting story often takes protagonists on the road which means the player would traverse a great number of smaller open areas with the occasional large area. While each location is still large enough to encourage exploration, these areas are centered around a central conflict the protagonists happen to find themselves stuck in.

time to settle this
strawpoll.me/10911220
strawpoll.me/10911220
strawpoll.me/10911220

Hanzo pls go

would not have a problem with that, they handled it spectacularly in gta v

No you can't, it's primarily an RPG mechanic because it uses strict algorithms to determine what random things happen. That shit wouldn't fly in a shooter, especially if it's going for the "do you play by the rules of the law or make your own?" concept that the previous game did. If anything, it would either just be a scene determined by whichever character you start the mission with or use some invisible "relationship" crap to determine who would more likely die.

There once was a man named John Marston, who was King of the Cowboys.
He had fame, power, and wealth beyond your wildest dreams.
Before they hung him from the gallows, these were the final words he said:
>"My fortune is yours for the taking, but you have to find it first! I left everything I own in Mexico."

>45min too long
>music didn't fit
>horse dancing

Other than that, it had its moments, but this film isn't worth watching a second time

youtube.com/watch?v=LdLQf1Ef9Ns

>post yfw

GTAV is boring as fuck

>strict algorithm to determine when random things happen
You highly overestimate RPG developers.

And yeah I agree any normal game would have the ending be based on various story triggers. I'm saying the games media revolutionary narrative would be to just pick a random ass ending for the final cutscene based on nothing at all.

It wasn't too good but but DiCaprio and Waltz carried it.

That is a true statement.

You provided all the evidence he needed. Django Unchained was awful.

It would be cool but I would have a feeling that it would boil the character down to muh land muh evil white man killed my tribe

>Waltz carried it
by making the same character he always does? i dont think so

A white American, typical cowboy type, Clint Eastwood, Jesse Mcree, John Marston, Revolver Ocelot type
A African American ex slave who begrudingly works with the white guy almost like Django
A Mexican or an Asian who knows about the treasure and accidentally reveals the plans to the White Cowboy

>Red Dead Redemption 2 announced
>you play as ten different characters
> some can use magic powers
>final boss is a young john marston

Tarantino has become a self-parody.

So assuming rockstar does the three mc thing again and they try to force in a minority which would you prefer? Mexican cowboy who's like Trevor but beaner version, black serious guy who is on a quest for muh slave revenge, or a Native American who turned to the ways of Whitney to fight back and is one with the earth. Or those three and no white mc?

The only problem with that is a glitch could easily occur and deny many people from getting any of the other endings, not to mention there'd probably only be like 4 endings, 3 where it's a combination of any two characters living (like GTAV) and maybe a 4th where the entire trio is wiped.

>Mexican cowboy

literally put Tuco in there and you're set.

this will do.

>Django Unchained was awful
it takes a special kind of faggotry to think that movie was awful

RDR on pc w-when?

>putting gta5 in even the same league as RDR
Is this some kind of joke?

Ps360 are PCs

I totally see them doing something like this.

>one of them is Ted Cruz

>Read Dead 3
>Its a pirate game
Yes or no? I'd like it.

Wouldn't mind seeing a Native character, even if they already did that with Red from Revolver and even implied John might have had some ancestry in his blood. Really, as long as each character had truly unique skills, but could still be enjoyed without any serious restrictions (beyond activities that would understandably be something only they do personally), I'm fine with seeing the multiple NPC concept possibly return.

Really though, I think it would be better with just one guy, since the switch mechanic does feel more suited to a modern environment than something where you'd just be seeing TREES DESERT TREES DESERT every time you changed.

...

Both are good game. Maybe not comparable in the same way Gun would be to RDR, but still fun games.

>two criminals and one bounty hunter
Only way I would be okay with multiple characters in a new Red Dead.

that could be interesting. some sort of Sheriff, Outlaw, and one other character.

>All three shoot at each other
>they're all laying on the ground
>while getting closer to death oil starts to spray out
>The End

>there are three main characters
>they're conjoined triplets forced to work at a sideshow until they escape

Stopped bothering with clothes because of this.

So it's just the good, the bad and the ugly?
Neat

>all those RDR votes
jesus christ people it wasn't THAT good or better than GTA 5

>Switch to Mexican
>he is in a saloon brawl
>switch to Native American
>feeding his horse
Not sure what the black guy would he doing.

>bow & arrow
how about no

I'd be okay with this setup

GTA5 has a terrible story though

That's a good ass movie

Cucking a white guy.

>I suck at aiming with bows in games

No shame in that user.

Regardless of opinions its a meme to hate GTAV and a meme to like RDR wtf did you expect from a meme posting website?

>civil war era red dead
>play as confederate
muuuuuuh diiiiiik

only problem is the weapons

So did the others, so not really a step back in that department.

being the sheriff

Why you want to play as the yokel, cousin fucking, loser ass confederates?

4 had a good story, so did san andreas and vice city, 4 just had terrible driving which was fixed later.

>protag 1 and 2 befriend each other but don't trust each other
>they nearly kill each other multiple times throughout the story
>during the last scene all 3 protags have a 3 way standoff at a cemetery
>it's tense as fuck
>protag 1 shoots and kills protag 3, not worrying about 2
>protag 2 is left wondering why the hell his gun had no bullets
>protag 1 had emptied his gun the night before
>protag 2 ends up having to dig up the treasure
>they find a shitload of gold, they both split
>HOWEVER
>protag 1 sets up a noose and makes protag 2 stand on a cross with his head through the loop
>protag 1 rides away, all while protag 2 is yelling at him to come back
>protag 1 rides over a hill, but turns around and heads to the the top of the hill
>he readies his repeater rifle, adjusts the sight and aims toward protag 2
>he shoots the rope and protag 2 lands face first into the pile of money
>protag 2 stands up and yells to protag 1:
>BLOOOOONDIEEEEEEEE
>YOU KNOOOW WHAT YOU AAAAAAARE
>JUST A DIRTY SON OF A *AYEAYEAYYYYYY WAH WAH WAHHHH*

They're all the same thing, they ape plot points of whatever films inspired them. There's nothing all that great about the plots, it's the characters that everyone likes, and that's something that has been good in every game.

it made sense for the cia not to kill franklin he was the only sane one and the cia have seen trevor and micheal go up against the army franklin was the only real match for them and the cia would've pinned it all on him in real like get fucked boy

>protagonist is anyone other than John Marston

Would actually kill someone to get this.

>IV had a good story

early 80s cliches arent good stories you ignorant faggot. The story in IV was literally rinse and repeat from a time you were swimming in your dads ballbag

RDR is to GTAV what Resident Evil 4 is to Resident Evil 6

Kill yourself

san andreas had a good story
don't let gta4 fans tell you otherwise
4 was just as horrible written as 5