ITT: Fidelity (how good/detailed the graphics are), Resolution, and FPS

ITT: Fidelity (how good/detailed the graphics are), Resolution, and FPS

choose one to kill, fuck, and marry

FPS > FIdelity > Resolution

Fid > FPS > Res.

in some genres, Fid > Res > FPS.

>Fuck, marry, kill
You are a literal child.

Real men use meme arrow lists. Best list coming through.
FPS > Resolution > Fidelity

FPS > Fidelity (chromatic aberration makes shit look so blurry, I hate it) > Resolution (I played BF3 on a crap top at 640x480, you think I give a shit?)

Don't tell me you're one of THESE people ?

All three are essential.

If any one of those is complete shit it'll severely hurt the game.

No, but I am one of those people who think that good graphics don't necessarily make a good game.

Why? I'm not a console gamer

It reminds me of my childhood and gives me the best possible FPS, so really it's a win/win.

On a console it would look like the bottom picture, only it'd be

good game>jerking off the math

fps>resolution>fidelity

Don't tell me you're not one of those people?

It's like when I had my first shitty computer and it was always interesting how the lowest settings differed from the screenshots

Gameplay>Numbers>Autism

mutliplayer
fps>resolution>fidelity

single-player
fidelity>resolution>fps

I'm still upset that you can only choose between bilinear and trilinear, nearly 20 years later

I want my fucking GL_NEAREST

>60 fps
>as in less than 90 fps

Not enjoyable. But also

>lower graphics settings
>significantly different than high graphics settings

Are you posting from 2007? The difference between "low" and "ultra" in a modern game is some draw distances and post processing filters. The lowest settings in any modern game are simply what the console version looks like. That's acceptable unless you're a muh GTX Titan fag who spends more time taking screenshots than playing.

Ive recently been playing a lot of 'old' stuff, which to me is just recent things, 2010+ fps games

I can sort of see the difference between low/off on everything and ultra on everything, but its not enough that I would seriously give a shit?

sometimes I wonder if the new generation is looking at something completely different from me, especially after I watch them play 20 ADS military shooters in a row

>less boring redition of the same concept = literal child

ok gramps

Why you little shit, get over here so I can give you a good talkin' to.

no daddy no

I get why they're playing ADS military shooters. They don't know what they're missing (if on PC) or aren't missing anything (if on consoles because you can't make a good FPS for consoles).

I just don't understand why they go out and buy a reskin every year instead of just sticking to the same game.

>new campaign
>new & (hopefully) improved mechanics,
>new maps
>most of your friends will move on to the new one

I don't know why I'm laughing so hard at these two quotes

Fuck music, marry gameplay, kill graphics.

true, music's pretty GOAT

If a 3D game is not rendered at my monitor's native resolution (or supersampled), I won't play it.
Anything else is tertiary in comparison.

>new 4 hour cutscene fest
>same shit slightly different, not better or worse, just different. except sometimes when it's worse.
>new maps just when you were getting good on the old maps
>all your friends are idiots so you have to be one, too

I get that you're playing devil's advocate but you're not making them seem any less retarded than they really are.