Objectively Right General Thread

Objectively Right General Thread

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=G9ymWo8t4tI
twitter.com/AnonBabble

>implying morality is objective
Go back to playing D&D

*pushes nerd into locker*

>break dudes arm
>alfred bitches at me saying I nearly killed him
fuck this shit game, worst alfred ever

Alfred is always a little bitch

>Telltale game exaggerates the consequences of your actions to make a decent choice seem bad
Wow no way

is there any game in existence that does player choice right in a meaningful way?

*turns you into a watermelon*

Black Ops 2

GOD TIER
BARB NECROMANCER

HIGH TIER
SORC PALADIN

LOW TIER
ASSASSIN

SHIT TIER
DRUID AMAZON

Age of Decadence.

Until Dawn does a decent enough job.

GOD TIER
Necromancer, Paladin

HIGH TIER
Barbarian, Druid

WOMEN, AND I ONLY PLAY MEN TIER
Sorceress, Amazon, Assassin

I hope you get really messed up one day. Relativism is cancer. Please consider hurting yourself

It is. The stronger side is right the weaker gets killed or beaten down. If your morality says it's okay to eat children and nobody can stop you from doing so or you can even force others to abide by it it's objectively right to eat children.

I just fucked a Touhou

you need to add the Square ones that are Extra seasoned by accident to God tier

no
NOOOOO
DONT TOUCH JUNKO FUCKING GARBAGE PIECE OF SHIT ILL FUCK U UP
THIS SHIT IS OBJECTIVLITY WORNG U ABSOLUTE FAGGOT

You're a whiny little faggot. If you truly subscribe to relativism you won't complain when dindu comes round to your house, skewers your mother with a bread knife and fucks her dead corpse while molesting your body pillows. Prepare to live a horribly shallow life.

You're approaching relativism wrong. It's a two way street.

Just because he's acting moral as he sees it doesn't mean gutting him like a fish isn't moral as I see it. I can still hate him for that, because in my morals hate is okay if they do things I don't like, and I don't have to like people who don't use similar morals to me.

>thinking relativism and amorality are the same thing

read a book, faggot

>Rye chips

>not High/God Tier

the only thing in this argument that is objectively wrong is you

Cultural relativism is different. It's almost as spineless though

what's the most one-sided that one of these telltale choices have been

Only without a dose of realpolitik. Realism makes it less spineless than objective moral systems.

Probably one of the really stupid ones in Walking Dead

Are you retarded? The faggot I was replying to was talking about morality being relative. I very much disagree with that notion. According to him you can never judge morality, never act on it or against it and never do anything.

This is aking to helping anyone holding a morality and views that differ from that point win by default. Because to them theirs is absolute and will not tolerate yours. Yet because you think morality is relative you can't oppose them when they come for you, as theirs is just as valid and worth as much as yours.

I do not support that concept at all nor do I believe in it. The strongest side can and will by force make their morality mandatory in the long run unless it buys into relativim as retards in the west started doing in the last few decades. This means morality isn't subjective by any means, as everyone will be forced to adhere to the accepted norm and any deviation be seen as inherently amoral.

>might is right

>might is not right

Alpha Protocol, Arcanum

>buying into slave morality

no u

>feelings are right

>muh eagles

youtube.com/watch?v=G9ymWo8t4tI

>Christian morals are the only alternative

15 ENDINGS FOR ONE SHITTY SINGLEPLAYER CAMPAIGN.
MADMEN.

But user strength is a defining feature of master morality.

I won't buy into your attempts to manipulate me!

Automatically assuming yourself as the slave aswell as being unwilling to fight and defend what you believe in.

If you're posting on an anime image board I've got bad news for you user.

>take down the shooter in the warehouse
>scare him with the pipe by bashing a barrel, don't touch him otherwise
>he spills it
>break his arm to teach him a lesson, the guy is a cop killer after all
>Alfred: WOW WTF YOU ALMOST KILLED HIM

No Alfred, you fucking faggot, a broken arm is not almost killing someone. The guy was a scumbag and nobody should feel sorry for him.

The game objecting to Batman's 'brutal' methods feels incredibly godamn shallow given the fact that Batman DOES NOT KILL. It may be for stupid reasons, and it might push the limits of believability that he can pull it off, but that's a facet of his character set in stone at this point. He is absolutely the wrong type of character to try and make some sort of grey morality argument about vigilantism and questionable methods, given that he kills less people than Gothams cops, while being undoubtedly more effective.

I still enjoyed the game though. Here's hoping we can fuck Vicki Vale.

Barb is low tier, Paladin is god tier. Dumb Duriel poster.

Batman breaks bad guys bones all the time. Why is Alfred so butthurt?