Load up menu

>load up menu
>it ain't me starts playing

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=3NJEsyde-YU
youtube.com/watch?v=cKNTX5wkaFU
twitter.com/NSFWRedditVideo

Whats wrong?

Does this still have players?

yes

Bad Company was the worst thing to happen to battlefield.

No, its EA.

Kill yourself.

Bad Company 1 and 2 had fantastic campaigns and even better multiplayer. DICE let it go to their head's when they took EA's money pill and decided took attack CoD in every commercial and pit two fanbases against each while simultaneously syphoning players away from CoD.

DICE became the demons in the end but they had a good run until BF4.


>No bolt actions in a World War 1 game

Just kill me

youtube.com/watch?v=3NJEsyde-YU

cant wait for rising storm 2

>BC 1 and 2 are good games!
classic

this happens to every series which got slaughtered into atrociousness
as soon as one not as bad(but still horribly bad) game comes out it becomes "good"

Why are they bad games? It was a refreshing change of pace for the series the only problem was that they elevated DICE to major developer status.

>Blind love of BC
>Brings up CoD for no reason
>Actually caring about wealwism in battlefield

I bet you only play HC too.

Look I appreciate your first Battlefield was Bad Company but please keep your objectively wrong opinions to yourself.

My first Bf was Modern combat

>load up menu
>white rabbit starts playing

>it ain't me

Fortunate Son, son.

> bad company 2 is my favorite battlefield game

also last battlefield with orchestral soundtrack
youtube.com/watch?v=cKNTX5wkaFU

>Iraq War II level
>LET THE BODIES HIT THE FLOOR starts playing

Arica Harbour best map

>Hiding behind the booby trapped logs just to drop them on one lone soldier.

BC2 is still the best Battlefield game

Battlefield 4 is good but they fucked up Rush more than in BF3

>wanting time period accurate weaponry and resource allocation is wrong


WWI was an actual war that fucking happened. The soldiers fighting the bullshit made up wars in BF2, BF3, BF3, and BC 1 and 2 can use whatever guns they want cause that shit is fake.


Bad company Vietnam had limited weapons and turned out fine.

Battlefield Vietnam had limited weapons and turned out fine

Battlefield 1943 had limited weapons and turned out fine

Battlefield 1942 had limited weapons and started the whole franchise.

Fuck DICE. People saying that DICE needed rare guns to make the fun are retards. DICE could the make the fun with time period relevant weapons and tactics but they forgot how to make good maps so they won't even bother.


The first thing I noticed about the game after the lack of bolt actions was the maps look like wide open plains with no strategic importance. If the troops aren't dug in they should be fighting over important landmarks like bridges and rivers.

This game better have sick ass naval battles or it's a day one return.

Yeah, it's not better than two but whatever

BC 2 is GOAT for shooters right?

You shouldn't get this upset about people liking video games user. Its unhealthy.

>Battlefield 1943
Ah yes, everyone knows that the Japanese always used bootleg M1 Garands and German rifes.

>Battlefield 1942
Now you're just shitting me.

I'd rather have Japs with stolen garands and imported Kar98ks than no trenches in a World War 1 game.

>it's just a shot away starts playing

>load up match
>nobody is playing

>no trenches
Ah right, you're just parroting memes. And they aren't captured garands, they're Japanese copies that weren't made until 1945. Still waiting for an explanation on the accuracy of 1942, or why 1943 couldn't have given the Japanese the right rifles.

>Still waiting for an explanation on the accuracy of 1942, or why 1943 couldn't have given the Japanese the right rifles

There is no fucking explanation. They just didn't cause it was a 15 dollar PSN not full scale AAA release so nobody gave a shit. Kar98 or arisaka, the game still felt like WWII shooter.

Also
>why couldn't the japanese rifleman be stuck with a bolt actions while the americans got garands

Every weapon in 1943 was a reskin so it didn't matter but it was a small release so again no one cared. BF1 could entirely be reskins and no one would notice because that's how the war actually was. If the trench gun was most the broken thing in the game I'd be happier than a retard with a helmet.


1943 could have been accurate and balanced but they didn't the USMC springfields like they should have.

>There is no fucking explanation. They just didn't cause it was a 15 dollar PSN not full scale AAA release so nobody gave a shit
My point is that it wouldn't have taken any extra effort to make an ariska rather than a Kar98k.
>why couldn't the japanese rifleman be stuck with a bolt actions while the americans got garands
You've completely missed my point. I never said that 1943 was bad for doing the things I mentioned (except for the rifles); my point was that it is comparable to BF1 in terms of accuracy and the motivations behind inaccuracy. Why is 1943 acceptable in its faults but BF1 isn't?

The music that plays during the loading screens is max chill

Becuase WWII shooters had been done to death 5 years before 1943 was even thought of so it being unrealistic, cartoony, and inaccurate was a change of pace compared to CoD, MoH, and all the other WWII shooters.

DICE cornered the market on WWI shooters the instant they announced the game. They could have made time period weapons fun through careful design and revamping the combat to fit a slower pace.

Instead they made bunny hop shooter: 1917 edition

>max chill
t. wigga

IT AIN'T ME
I AIN'T NO MILLIONAIRES SON

Whatever that means
I was going to say comfy, but chill fits the Vietnam Grunt diction better