Thoughts on these two games? Which one is better? Thinking about picking one of these

Thoughts on these two games? Which one is better? Thinking about picking one of these.

Get Fallout NV and XCOM EU instead of those garbage piles

Neither are very good. XCOM 2 is still inferior to the original which can be played hassle free with OpenXcom and Fallout 4 is shit.

>Get Fallout NV and XCOM EU instead

Already have both, guess I shouldn't get anything then.

Get Fallout 1 and 2 and Jagged Alliance 2.

Neither get MGSV instead

Get XCOM 2, Fallout 4 is crap, pic ALWAYS related.

I pirated XCOM 2 and enjoyed it.

If you liked XCOM1 get 2, otherwise FO4.

Fuck off hipster fag

XCOM 2 is better and you should get it if you enjoyed EU. Although it should be a direct step up from the previous game I didn't enjoy it as much, but it's still worth playing

XCom 2. This shouldn't even be a question.

Both POORLY optimized piles of ass

But Fallout 4 brings more to the table, and that's even before you start adding mods and DLC

XCOM2 really sucks ass and has no good side to it

XCOM 2 is bad but Fallout 4 is probably worse.

>vidya game franchise get casualized
Hold the fucking presses!
But if you're not looking for an RPG but want to player a FarCraft shootersimbox game, you might find FO4 fun.

HOT DAMN. now thats a tough decision because both are pretty damn bad. But honestly I feel like Xcom at least stays itself more than fallout 4 did. They acted like fallout 4 was going to be a fallout game, instead they gave us a settlement game and keep pumping out settlement DLC as if anyone liked settlement mode.

>2016
>liking good games is now considered hipster on Sup Forums

None of those games are obscure. Fuck off reddit.

Well, Minecraft is one of the few games that actually sold more than Fallout 4 so

I've gotten more gameplay out of fallout 4

You're better off playing minesweeper instead of dropping 60 bucks for XCOM 2. Basically the same fucking gameplay since your victory or defeat hinges entirely on whatever tile you stepped on and if it is an auto-miss from that turn's seed.

Fallout 4 has better writing, better gameplay and is just plain better overall. Even more so with DLC

>as if anyone liked settlement mode

Building stuff was pretty fun, but the problem was that the AI settlers didn't do fuck shit with it because they were so poorly coded. I built a whole city, down to the little details like furniture and flower plants and shit, and then all they do is stand on the roof not doing their fucking job

Todd Howard is a liar

Don't listen to Sup Forums.

92% is not 100%. You are dumb.

Why don't they just roll dice before every attack? Would be nice if they showed the dice rolls and the number you need to make a hit too.

>miss a 92% shot
>get assmad on the internet
there are legitimate faults but not lying about your odds isn't one of them

>an auto-miss from that turn's seed
I still can't believe there's still bitching about this. It is LITERALLY FUNCTIONALLY RANDOM UNLESS YOU SAVESCUM LIKE A SCUM

XCOM 2 is a direct upgrade from EW and anyone who says otherwise is a babbo who can't handle turn timers

Yuh, listen to (((professional reviewers))) instead

Genuine question. Why do people pay money for games when you can do a quick search on a Torrent site?

>WOOOOOOOOOOOW HOW WAS I SUPPOSED TO KNOW THIS 92% SHOT HAD AN 8% CHANCE OF MISSING BUGGED RNG MECHANICS

Support Todd by buying FO4. Don't play garbage game like XCOMs when you could be spending all that precious time on Fallout.

I like to give money to people who make good games

They don't do that because if they did you would be able to save scum. I don't remember exactly how it works but all the dice are rolled before each level is started and they compare some stats to whichever roll you're on at the time and then that decides whether you miss or not. Like that other user said, it's basically the same thing, you just can't save scum. Civ V does something similar unless you enable that new seed on reload option.

Doesn't make it good.

New Vegas is better than Fallout 3.

lol

>92% means 100%

Okay.

But what does he think about New Vegas?

These images aren't allowed anymore since he un-JUST'd himself.

New Vegas is a good game user, that's all you need to know

lol what a retard

redpill me on that

I appreciate the timers, but the game lost all of EU's charm and the plot/mission structure is a lot worse. They gutted the global game and got rid of the air game entirely.

He refused to review Ghostbusters and Twitter white knights had a tantrum over it.

Then don't allow saves in combat????
Or stop managing how your players play???

>The XCOM defense force out to shill for their shitty RNG game with zero tactics.
Please, Missing almost every single 80+% shot is retarded and forced. There is no strategy or tactics to a game decided entirely by dice rolls and punishing you with a domino effect if you ever miss a shot. Shit game is shit. No shekels for you, kikes.

...

Nothing wrong with missing shots. The problem is nuXcom's retarded systems that mean you can only shoot once a turn while in classic X-COM you have multiple firing types and TUs that allow you to mitigate things like that.

>Then don't allow saves in combat????
Great idea. Let's not allow players to save their games mid-mission
>Or stop managing how your players play???
Even though I agree they should just add savescum option for those who want it. Why shouldn't developers get to decide how player experience is going to be?