HITLER SHOULD BE IN CIV 6 WE ALREADY HAD STALIN SO WHY ARE YOU HOLOCAUST SHAMING HITLER?

HITLER SHOULD BE IN CIV 6 WE ALREADY HAD STALIN SO WHY ARE YOU HOLOCAUST SHAMING HITLER?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=bS5P_LAqiVg
youtube.com/watch?v=AtW1Lq5c04E
youtube.com/watch?v=0Eq8gBI5riU&ab_channel=h3h3Productions
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

We aren't getting the Mongols because they raped. Do you really think they'd put Hitler in?

HE DID NOTHING WRONG

I honestly couldn't even give a flying fuck about civ 6

the game has been shit since civ 3

just let it fucking die already

Then why are they putting russia in.

its more that the majority of germany doesnt want to be represented as him and it would be rude and outright offensive to the majority of the country.

But he's Austrian, plus his rule was pretty short and it ended in absolute desaster for the Krauts

Why are they adding any historical civilisation if that's the case? It's not like rape or mass rape was something only the Mongolians and Soviets did.

Oh who am I kidding expecting historical fact from a video game.

Because Stalin beat Hitler?

>We aren't getting the Mongols because they raped.
What? But they did have the Mongols

everything germany did in ww1 and ww2 really ended in disaster

Spain did even worse

Portrayals of nazis are illegal in germany, if they put in Hitler they lose the entire country by default

They'll just do like hoi4 and put shadow Hitler

Which makes it even stranger that people laugh at Wilhelm II for being a useless warmongering cripple, but put Hitler on some meme pedestal.

Portrayals of the Hakenkreuz is illegal. Hitler is no problem. There was even a movie recently about him somehow timetraveling into the future and becoming a tv moderator. There was also sketch show on tv where he appeared as chef of an office.

Albert of Prussia would make more sense as a Germany rep than some failed Austrian art student.

jews still upset about the whole thing.

because Russia eventually had communism which is like so very cool bro

boss not chef. Mixed up the words since chef is also a word for boss in german.

>it's not just plain old Hitler
>it's shadow magic Hitler

Anyone with millions of people (basically more men than the enemy had bullets) would win.

Not that much of an achievement.

Then why didn't Europe not surrender?

>Holocaust shaming
Only on Sup Forums.

...

It's not like the nazis couldn't have won against the soviets. They had assault rifles and shit, but decided not to use them. They were also way better trained, so the troop advantage didn't really matter when each german soldier killed 5 russians.

[sources required]

>There was even a movie recently about him somehow timetraveling into the future and becoming a tv moderator
Title of the movie?

Because it'd get banned in Germany, and that's a big market.

Stalin was a hero, Hitler was a monster.

It is quite simple:

Stalin died and the Soviet Union was one of the greatest powers on Earth after his rule.

Genghis Khan died and the mongols were a monstrously powerful horde after his rule.

How was Germany left after Hitler's rule again?

German title is "Er ist wieder da", or in english: "He is back". Not sure tho if it is the correct english title

Hitler literally ruined Germany

absolutely no reason to have him in civ unless it's for a specific scenario

Question:

Why is Hitler so universally reviled to the point that he cannot be mentioned in media? Note that I'm not saying shit like "he did nothing wrong" or the like, but his killings (which were still bad regardless) were far smaller in number than folks such as Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, and many other individuals in history. Hell, the Romans killed people in mass numbers, yet we don't shame people for mentioning them.

youtube.com/watch?v=bS5P_LAqiVg

An insanely powerful refugee center

In english it's "Look who's back". It's based on a german bestseller novel.

USSR's 2 main issues (as fucking usual) were: their army is always fucking spread across country (18 fucking 12) and they couldn't unite all their forces into formidable opposition. And outdated weaponry (18 fucking 12).

Bismarck was the better choice anyway.

>die for my people
>shot himself like a fucking coward

lmao what a colossal faggot

(())

>but my spirit will rise from the grave
Ghost Hitler in Civ when?

hitler rounded up g-d's chosen, stalin just killed slavs.

> Oh my god hitler was so evul!
> Meanwhile, stalling purged millions upon millions and nobody cares
oy gevalt dont forget the twenty million

Because CCCP won. Winners don't do bad things.

Because Nazis were like legitimately real life villains and media still painting them like that makes it just a touchy subject.

It's like, imagine reporter saying live: "I have a 9/11 joke, but it always falls flat." It just won't land very well with audiences.

Because having such a high profile leader would take the focus away from the game. He would have to be a monster all the time so normie would stay satisfied, and there couldn't be any pattern problems with like Ghandi.
Having a leader like that would make him more than this neutral AI on the background, which is what the leaders are suppose to be.

But people such as Mao and Stalin are not "real life villains"? I guess I should be asking "so why is it fine to talk about Stalin and Mao despite how many people they killed?".

I fully understand the sensitive nature of the acts Hitler committed, but why does this seemingly not apply to any other mass-murderer dictators?

>Hitler now looks like the boss from an old anime
"You'll have the defeat my 4 heavenly generals to stand a chance!

>Himmler
>Goebbels
>Goering
>Rommel is the final one and the only one sympathetic

Because the backlash for hitler is much bigger than the backlash for stalin. It would also ban the game in several countries.

Not in Civ VI

"Too Controversial"

>get captured alive or shot by the enemy
>get your body captured
>get showcased in some russki museum as a symbol of victory over a big baddy
>germans even more sad over the defeat

Jewish propaganda

I guess because Hitler made 1st September of 1939 happen and then lost, so you should bully him for being a loser.

>le russia only won with numbers and germans had a shit leadr

I like how people keep forgetting how scary the ussr became once they got their shit together mid way and well unto the rest of the centruy.

>But people such as Mao and Stalin are not "real life villains"?
Was Stalin building concentration camps on foreign soil?

They where despised during the cold war. Infact being called a commie back than was the equivalent of being called a nigger. However the coldwar has ended and communism is gaining popularity among the youth.

The reason its still taboo for national socialism is probably because of the prison gangs and edgy groups that associate with it.

What sounds more appealing? White power or power to the working class?

because slavs buy games, mongols dont even have internet.

this.
They control the media and the politicians, they also make the laws of "democratic" countries. Basicaly, this is something they decided no one should like and no one should comment on publicly. It's basically censorship disguised as being "hate speech".

America had very hardcore propaganda campaign to diminish any accomplishments USSR ever made.

finally a good opinion

Because he waged war on people like us while nobody gives a shit about Chinese and Russians dying from famines.
Sad but true.

Temporal proximity and cultural relevancy.

The Romans, the Mongols, the Assyrians, multiple ancient powers all murdered countless amounts of people many times in absolutely horrifying ways. But the problem is, centuries have passed since them, and the passage of time has a way of cooling the horrifying nature of events. When they're submitted to the study of historians they're treated less as calamities and atrocities and more as historical events of note that are weighted amongst the various accomplishments of a people or a nation in order to see how they influenced the world around them.

In the grand scope of history, the World Wars were basically yesterday, and the tragedies, accomplishments and bloody disasters of it are still directly connected to our culture and values. If you're british, or french, or german, or any other nation that participated in the war, you can still look at all the people who were shot down holding the line, or who heroically charged in battle and accomplished glorious things, or who were noteworthy leaders, and see them as your countrymen. The further back you go in time, the more these events are fogged by history. They lose color to the common man, so to speak.

Because memes don't count

Then why are they putting America in?

>he doesnt follow german KINO
youtube.com/watch?v=AtW1Lq5c04E

They got their shit together because of german scientists. You realise that germany was the most advanced country in ww2?

You seem like you are asking a genuine question, and not just pol bait, so let me give you a try.

Hitler rounded up and killed people of multiple nationalities, faiths and sexual preferences.

The rest killed mostly their own. Hitler also came closer to conquering the europe (and to extent, the world) than any of those.

Not saying the others aren't as fucked up as hitler was, but it's a series of reasons.

Communism is also still accepted around the world, especially it's reformist side (social democracy) while national socialism/fascism is almost universally reviled because they are authoritarian at core, racist and deeply prejudiced. The powerful continue powerful, and receive even more power to destroy minorities they deem below them;

In the end, even if everyone fucked up trying ot so far, communism only really hate those who control the means of productions. And let's be honest, who doesn't, but themselves?

>USSR got their shit together
>Because German scientists

>communism only really hate those who control the means of productions. And let's be honest, who doesn't, but themselves?
>not aspiring to be like them instead of being a bitter faggot

I bet you act like those catty women who begin bitching when they see a chick who looks better than them.

Game is stacked against you. Chances are you will never reach that place unless you, unless you are already born in the purple.

Lowering myself to your level:

Most girls (and people in general) are an average 5/10. There is no reason trying to be a 9/10, it just won't happen. Better to break down the ridiculously high beauty standard.

No amount of good sciencetists can fix a cunt. They gradually regress despite having all the science and technology they made.
The reason they can get their shit together is beccause they can focus their effort on national matter without opposition thanks to the post war situation. But when they start to gain something, the flaw in their system show and corruption starts taking its root.

wtf I love Hitler now

pretty much this, Germany completely lost when they created two fronts to fight. America's recources and joining in the fight only determind how quickly Germany would fall. Even Japan's time was limited, with no oil from America their army was going to crawl to a stop

5/10 girls can always eventually settle down if they want
the same doesnt apply for men
But in the grand scheme of thing, average men are expendable, women less so. No reason to break down anything or risk surgery.

Of course the same applies for men; breaking the man beauty standard would also help men, much like it would help women.

In the end, it as just an analogy

>It just won't land very well

...

>Muh gorillions

ok so what about mao and stalin?

Winners write the history, simple as.

except the history isn't clouded or manipulated. we know for a fact mao and stalin murdered millions and we know the details too

everbody hate them in the west. chinks dont like mao, they just pretend to because the propaganda train went too far. slavs dont like stalin, only hardcore commies do. Firashit must have thought their memetic prowess is equal to their reputataion and slavs and chinks dont just pirate games.

The context is written by the victors tho.

They were communists so they we hate them.

We know this these days because of the internet and justice warriors, but there are still many, many people who don't know about that stuff,compared to how many know of Hitler or the Hunns for example.
Also Mao and Stalin (Mao more so) doing terrible things aren't as evil and savage in the eyes of the public, because they didn't lose

>tfw you will never live during the shortest but most legendary time in history
IT HURTS BROS

Mao and Stalin are missing the cultural relevance aspect of it. And when I say cultural relevancy, I specifically mean cultural relevancy to 20th century western civilization.

The soviet purges and the famines resulting from Mao's policies have killed untold amounts of peoples, true, but all of that has remained mostly self-contained to their own territories and spheres of influence. They haven't, how can I put it, negatively impacted the standards of living of western societies in any meaningful way. France was not conquered because of it. No american ports were bombed in a surprise attack because of Mao's production policies. They haven't brought calamity and death to our cities and our families, and as a result we can deal with them. Give them some leeway, if you will.

That doesn't make any deaths they have caused any less monstrous or worthy of condemnation. But one think you must understand is that you don't turn someone into a inhuman beast because he or she is a monster, but because he or she goes against your interests as a society and of those like you.

>implying that Hitler could have taken over the world

even if he won all the wars (which is impossible) rebels would have taken back territority back all over the place

even if you had only stormfags all over the world, they would have started to struggle against each other

hitler was crazy and so was his retarded dream

Vape Natioyall when?

youtube.com/watch?v=0Eq8gBI5riU&ab_channel=h3h3Productions

Most of those people are LITERAL WHOS because most Millenials don't know their history.

That's why you're getting a shit load of new age commies.

I was lucky enough to do history as an elective in high school and we studied the Russian revolution and Soviet Union.

Learned about the horrors that socialism and communism could inflict.

>comparing stalin to hitler

the difference between stalin and hitler is that the nazis murdered millions while the bolsheviks tried to save millions in the soviet union who died of famine through experimental farming techniques. if you seriously think stalin was "evil" like hitler than you are a tool who knows jack shit about history

KINO

hitler doesnt want the world. he want to share it with his muzzies niponese and italian bffs.
much better than americans, they want the world for the jews and themselves.

USSR's propaganda posters is the shit. Lenin was a sick dude.

>tfw Putin visits Sup Forums

>the bolsheviks tried to save millions in the soviet union
>mfw

Yeah, just like they tried to save all those Czars, Christians, and people who didn't like communism. That picture is the very proof of his "evil" nature.

>earned about the horrors that socialism and communism could inflict.
exactly the kind capitalism and democracy could? :^)

So I take it that those manufactured famines and purges didn't happen, right?

Hitler didn't kill millions though. The Holocaust never happened and Hitler didn't want the war.