Intel will never get this BTFO ever agian

>intel will never get this BTFO ever agian

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/eUSJfGehKDQ?t=2m37s
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

my first tech obsession 2bh

Maybe, but this is a nice start.

Yeah, since AMD stopped competing.

Intel now spends more on R&D than AMD is worth as a company, like 3 times over.

Why do you kids make stupid statements like this?
Intel, who has the cost of running their own fab, spends about $12 billion in total R&D per year. The bulk of this goes into process development.
AMD has been averaging around $5 billion per year in revenue during the lifespan of the BD series. The valuation of the company is significantly higher.

...

...

>Sup Forums is leaking into Sup Forums and Sup Forums is leaking into Sup Forums

Again, why do you kids, and you clearly are a kid, make stupid statements like this?
R&D expenditures are not the same thing as company valuation.

HEY

WHAT'S THE PROBLEM

My first "real" CPU was a mobile Athlon XP 2800, replacing my During 900.
Things were a lot simpler then.

>dad still has a computer with this processor
It runs like fucking shit. Probably because the thermal paste was never changed and I'm sure it has enough dust in it to create a second Dustbowl. At this point I'm just confused how the computer is still running.

wrong, amd zen is going to force intel to drop prices across the board.

>Intel
>Dropping prices
kek
if anything they go up with every generation

Intel never lowered their prices in the past, they won't do it now.
Summit Ridge will be priced at 50% of Haswell-E, less than a third of the top end Broadwell-E, and intel will never change a thing.

Yeah Intel could release the i7 killer now. There is no reason for them to compete with themselves though. AMD took the hard direction with Bulldozer and people didn't go for it unfortunately.

I feel like I'm the only person on the web that sees the massive positives about the architecture. The space savings gained with their architecture and a die shrink to 14nm would allow the GPU partition to be very large.

The PS4 was able to fit two Athlon 5350s (8 cores) and a HD7870 on board. That's a pretty beastly chip in bandwidth. Its not fast but can handle a lot of load when optimized around its limited speed.

amd zen performs on par with broadwell and will be 8 core 16 threads on the high end model.

that's what AMD says, so in other words
>itll be on par with Sandy Bridge except in very specific applications that Sup Forums will meme about just like they do with the RX480 and DX12

Intel has been lazy as fuck.

I hope that AMD approaches kick their asses so they'll finally give us 8 core "enthusiast" stuff.

Fucking ridiculous that they're still releasing quad core as the top line for non-workstation consumers.

Intel GPUs vs Nvidia GPUs when

youtu.be/eUSJfGehKDQ?t=2m37s

watch the video dummy

AMD was sabotaged by Intel when this released. Had the Athlon 64 saw wide adoption by the pre-built manufacturers AMD would have had the finances to heavily improve it. We could have seen the Phenom II x4 instead of the original Phenom x4 and the Core2Quad would have been beat from launch

Yeah the official Zen demo from AMD, because we should always believe AMD after Shitdozer and Poolaris.

The BD module didn't save any significant die area vs K10.5 as shown in Llano which shares the same 32nm PD-SOI process.
It wasn't terrible by design, it was a project that never had any clear direction because the management in the company was constantly changing. The Bulldozer core arch was detailed in 2005 as the highest single threaded performance CPU ever. This never saw the light of day, and what launched in 2011 was an abomination.

Summit Ridge matched mid range Broadwell-E, when it was limited to 3ghz, in one incredibly specific Blender scene.
The Zen core arch doesn't have an FPU anywhere near the size of intel's current Core i iteration.

It will not match Broadwell-E in general performance, but will be competitive at price point.

Per clock performance is about equal to Ivy Bridge - Haswell in most ops excluding heavy FPU bound things.

>That giant shit smear for a logo

Seriously how does AMD not know that looks like someone wiped a piece of shit in a circle, or a very long turd floating in a toilet?

Holy shit that resolution tho. haha.

all they have to do is sell the 8/16 cpu for $550 and intel is going to sweating.

Why exactly are AMD processors so much slower than Intel?

because at the moment they're just older tech being overclocked
the newer zen ones won't be as slow and I think they'll probably catch up to intel in a few years maybe

Did people really still use 800x600 in 2004?

>Holy shit that resolution tho. haha.
Do you know how cpu benchmarking works?

Why is it on high quality tho

some things can be cpu dependant

It won't happen until AMD goes under. Nvidia almost took out ATI in 2007 but ATI was successfully saved by AMD. AMD then won legal battles that ATI had been waging with Nvidia for a decade and now Nvidia no longer controls the graphics market

The HD6970 was the best GPU ATI ever made when it released. It literally fixed the biggest problems ATI had with code compatibility making their architecture about equal to Nvidia in efficiency

Nvidia could have gone under in 2010. Fermi was a complete disaster and their competitor eliminated their biggest advantage. Their mind-share was the only thing that saved them

>tfw had a 3800+ X2