Post games Sup Forums never talk about
Post games Sup Forums never talk about
Other urls found in this thread:
It would literally get shitposted to death on account of being furshit.
>want to play it
>have no friends who are furfag enough to play it
I don't really want to get labeled as dogfucker.
...
Barnaby da bes
What does that game even want to be?
stop shilling your game
People sure are insecure since they freak the fuck out at anything to do with anthropomorphic animals these days.
Are there people complaining about furries in Bloodborne because there are werewolves in that game too?
An exploring roguelite game with actually good writing inspired by Lovecraft.
Never seen people talk about Outpost 2.
It's an RTS, but with a much heavier focus on civilians and non-military structures, without reaching the complexity of being a city sim.
Does it work?
I like it, but its grindy as fuck in the beginning or if you don't know what to do to get some money (like the salt lions trade).
It's worth reading some reviews though. I don't recommend watching lets plays that much because the gameplay is kinda slow and its mostly reading. I should mention that the area near fallen london (where you start) is permanent but the rest of the ocean is RNG. Not the isles per se but their locations. The game is getting an expansion in october.
There's a difference and you damn well know it.
Picture on left: show's our fear that people we know could turn into a murderous beast at any moment.
Picture on the right: someone REALLY liked 1973 Robin Hood
You can't cure autism. Anthropomorphic animals will forever be furfaggotry to retards on Sup Forums.
No one else on Sup Forums gives a shit, though.
>There's a difference and you damn well know it.
No theres not
>left; rule 34 furry porn
>right; rule 34 furry porn
I'll keep it in mind when the expansion comes then.
Not OP but I get what you're saying. However I'de say anything can be sexualized and pretty much "ruined". Neither of your pictures are porn although the difference is there, but it's almost an argument of quality with what you posted. What if the first image was of the same quality with the werewolf fucking a dude etc?
>What if the first image was of the same quality with the werewolf fucking a dude etc?
That would change the intent of the artwork from trying to scare to viewer to trying to arouse the viewer.
Right now the image is supposed to inspire fear, you are looking at a beast that just killed a man and could come after me next.
If it was that same werewolf fucking the dude instead I wouldn't feel my life was in immediate danger. Even if the art quality was the same.
nah, this was shilled for an entire week here on its release.