Top 100 games of all time list

>Top 100 games of all time list
>#1 Super Mario Bros.

Other urls found in this thread:

usgamer.net/articles/reconsidering-donkey-kong-country-gamings-empty-handed-bluff
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>Top 100 faggots of all time list
>#1 OP

>Top 100 console of all time list
>#1 Ouya

>Top 100 games of all time list
>Contains video games

woah nice observations there you FUCKING FAGGOTS CONTRIBUTE TO MY THREAD OR FUCK OFF AND DIE CAN YOU NOT EVEN HANDLE SUCH A SIMPLE CONCEPT NEVER RFUCKING TYPE A SINGLE FUCKING LETTER IN ANOTHER ON E OF M Y FUCKING THRTEADS EVER AGAGAIN

>Best console list
>A Nintendo console is number 1

You're not OP, stop lying.

But what is water? It's a difficult question, because water is impossible to describe. One might ask the same about birds. What are birds? We just don't know.

>the top five is not all SEGA consoles
Sign of a plebian lit.

>Top 100 shitest threads in Sup Forums history
>#1

>1st place
>not Deus Ex

Golden Axe is better.

woah nice meme can I save it

if it's the SNES, there's nothing wrong with this.

It's all yours my friend :)

Yeah it's really more like #5

Except that the Snes was an outdated piece of hardware with a bunch of story games and kiddy platformers. It was a worthless system and its games suffered from the limitations of the hardware.

>kiddy
in other words not edgy enough.
only console that rivals the SNES' library is the PS2

...

Those both suck. They're only decent if you like interactive narratives over games, but we're talking about GAMES consoles.
Kiddy means easy, slow, and low skill ceiling.
The best consoles are the Saturn, Neo Geo, Master System and Dreamcast.

I dunno if its nostalgia or what but i always prefered PS1 library over PS2, 3D games were worse but at least some 2D games looked really gorgeus

Except that the SNES was well known compared to what was released at its time for having some of the most beautiful games. For example, Donkey Kong Country and Country 2 were considered top tier graphically for their time, and DKC2 is still a masterpiece.

In terms of contributions to our current paradigm of video games, Mario Bros and OoT contributed the most.

There's nothing that exists in vidya today that those two games haven't introduced

DKC was released in 1994, it wasn't even that impressive on the Snes hardware, let alone all platforms in that year. I hope you're taking the piss.

Don't hurt yourself brah

>Top 100 games of all time list
>#1 Overwatch

This drives Sega Orphans crazy

The SNES was modular and not limited at all.

Mode 7 nigger

Not OP, but in retrospect we can say it wasn't but at the time it was certainly received that way. Everything from EGM to Gamepro to just the kids on my block were like "OMG DKC LOOKS SO RAD" and, yeah, it kinda did.

Moreso, it looked different from most stuff you'd wind up playing. While other games may have had similar rendering, DKC and other pre-rendered games like KI were really eye-catching on the SNES simply for being "kinda 3D" in their aesthetic. It's definitely something that also led into appreciation for pre-rendered backdrops in FFVII-IX and games like that.

Our perspective now is way more informed of course and we know a lot more about how those processes work, but let's not pretend we knew better back then.

usgamer.net/articles/reconsidering-donkey-kong-country-gamings-empty-handed-bluff

Except you are wrong, and this is just one example. I was actually old enough to discuss that time period, unlike you.

>top 100 games of all time
>#1 is Half-Life 2

What about screen scrolling? That comes before those games.
I don't think SMB or OoT really invented anything.
The Lynx did sprite scaling and rotation first. The Snes hardware was woefully unimpressive when it was released.

>not limited at all
>nigger
Confirmed for edgelord

Also, wtf do you mean by "modular"? You could add on-cart chips, but nothing to the actual system (unless you consider never-used expansion slots). AFAIK the Genesis could do the same but only did so more rarely.

...

who are you quoting?

Compared to what exactly?

You can't just make baseless criticism. Thus isn't your liberal critical theory class, your criticism must be relative to the era.

Neo Geo was stronger but also cost thousands of dollars at the time, also had fewer games that were only designed for arcade-length play duration.

Before anyone comments about how weird it is to have that stuff over there, I've been there and there is a glass floor spanning that gap.

Meanwhile the Amiga, which was released in 1985, could render far better graphics.
So because someone who only played Mega Drive and Snes thinks graphics look good that is a fact? No. DKC may have been impressive in the late 80s, but by 1994 it was not impressive. I remember some hype about the game back then, but that was just the way it was marketed towards people who had no clue outside of the mainstream home consoles.

it's obviously symbolic and you can take the list to mean "most important"

>a bunch of literally what's and literally who's did things before Nintendo
>Nintendo popularized and improved on all of it

Compared to most things in arcades and on home computers, like the Amiga. Virtua Fighter 2 was out by 1994, for God's sake.

The SNES had wireless Internet connection before the internet even existed. Do your research, Trump supporter.

>popularized[sic]
Yes
>improved
Rarely

nice lie faggot

wut

Before I entertain your trolling bullshit anymore you better nut up and post a game that has better graphics then. And if you post Doom you getting laughs m80.

Nothing wrong with that, one of the least offensive and more understandable popular choices. Would rather have that and not the usual top 10 of new games that will be forgotten in a year.

The Amiga is a personal computer line. Which Amiga? :P

Like the A1000? Sure. For $2600 USD (adjusted) it could.

>top 100 shonen animes
>#1 jojo

Virtua Fighter 2, Cruisn USA, NBA Jam, Wrestlemania the Arcade Game, Battletoads Arcade, Darius Gaiden.
Seriously, the Snes couldn't compete with new arcade architecture. Get over it.

>:P
Fuck off
>$2600
Price is irrelevant. The GX4000 was cheaper than the Snes, does that make it more graphically impressive?

Thank you for Correcting The Record™

$0.35 has been deposited in your I'm With Her™ account.

wut

Are you stupid? Why would the SNES compete with arcade machines? We don't compartmentalize those as in the same realm. Outside of the ridiculously priced Neo Geo ($649.99 USD) which could render 2D arcade-level, we wouldn't see home consoles capable of that until the Dreamcast.

So... not a fair comparison? Plus people who pay heavy attention to the arcade scene at the time are not the same people who were kids playing Sonic and Mario at home. SOME were, but not the majority, and we can compartmentalize "this is what we can get at home, this is what's at the arcade" as two different sets of expectations.

So for a home console, DKC was pretty sweet.

Looking back, I hope people expecting a successor to the SNES ended up buying a PlayStation rather than an N64

Price isn't irrelevant at all. It helps determine how accessible a system is and in what market it's sold. The Amiga was sold as a PC, not a gaming console and was bought largely by adults for adults. The SNES was sold as a home console, largely for kids and teens, and was bought as such.

>Top 100 PC games
>#1 it's a game also on consoles

Really?

iirc the neo geo home system was never formally sold to the public, and it was only ever meant to be rented from video stores

Yeah, so you're agreeing with me. I said that DKC was only impressive to people who didn't have any clue outside of Sega and Nintendo. Anyone who was knowledgable about video games at the time could see that DKC wasn't at all impressive in the grand scheme.

Virtual On was the only impressive arcade game from the 90s.

SNES was king otherwise. An overclocked SNES can run literally anything.

>Price is irrelevant.

Not that guy, but part of what makes a good console is accesible price.

Of course, the game library is the most important thing.

Not even top 50 bro.

SNES is a nostalgia meme console. Half the library was garbage and even it's best games are basic compared to games today. I'd say it arguably has maybe 5 or so titles that are even close to Bloodborne.

NES fags are the same people who'll shit on indie games with retro graphics yet fail to realize they are better than 99% of the NES catalog. (NES including SNES for all above)

Consoles weren't always shit, user. It's a pretty recent thing

Sure, but that's not the majority of the gaming public at the time. MOST people AT THE TIME were impressed by DKC because it was technically impressive to the console market, and because it was aesthetically something new.

I remember PC gamer made an all-time best PC list like two years ago and the top two games were Mass Effect 2 and Skyrim

We're talking about what wavle of rendering the best graphics, not what could do the best on a budget.

*tips fedora*

>Bloodborne

lel

>top 10 Zelda games
>#1 is either ALTTP or Ocarina

>Half-life 1 doesn't even make the list

Keep your machines in the correct arenas though. You can't compare an A1000 with a SNES or you might as well start throwing in top-end computer systems of the era and blow it all away.

"Hey look ma, we're gonna grade these college kids' art show against the Renaissance Masters. That's fair, right?"

Have some reasonable criteria.

It doesn't matter. I didn't say that basic console owners weren't impressed, I said that people who knew video games and were aware of what was going on around them weren't impressed. It really doesn't matter what an uninformed kid thought back then.

>top 100 games
>walking simulators anywhere on the list
>call of duty anywhere on the list

>Rarely

Nigga, it did a lot of times. It improved it.

>#1 is wind waker
>they immediately out themselves as GC kiddies

>There's nothing that exists in vidya today that those two games haven't introduced
>nintendrones actually believe this
>they still don't realize nintendo has been selling them shittier versions of the same games over and over

This year top 2 were Dark Souls and TW3

Like I don't think they are aware of how bad the PC port of DaS is

(You)

OoT has every genre in it.

Search your feelings, you know it be true.

>top XX games list
>Dark Souls appears
>the only reasoning for it is OH MY GOD IT'S SO HARD

It kinda does, and you still have to account for close-parity machines. You can't throw an arcade machine next to a SNES and expect any kind of fair comparison.

1. You can't buy them for the same price.

2. They have distinctly separate disadvantages and advantages towards their markets.

3. One is intentionally a scaled down, pared-back economy version of the other, on purpose, whose primary point is to be a play-many set-top while the other is intended as a dedicated play-few installation.

We're talking about what could render the best graphics in 1994. Yes, the Snes was weak hardware, just admit that. The Master System II was still being sold back then, so I guess it had the best graphics because it was cheap. You're an idiot. Just admit that DKC was not impressive in 1994.

The justification for Skyrim at #1 was literally "you can mod it guys!", so I assume something similar was used to justify putting in Dark Souls

Modern Warfare should get a low spot tbqh.

Game is great and I can see why someone would put it as #1 many times, but that's bullshit.

r8 Sup Forums's 2008 taste

Difficulty in games to anyone that isn't a fucking casual is an afterthought. Sure, challenge is nice, but a true patrician appreciates the atmosphere, world, and lore of Dark Souls more than the difficulty. Another good example is the Paper Mario series - easy as fuck, but amazing games.

I agree with you though, fuck shitty list-makers who've probably never even played Dark Souls and put it in there for hardcore points.

No one's debating that the SNES is "weak" when you consider the larger range. That's not even on the table because it goes without saying.

But within its own class, DKC was still visually impressive for its time. The SNES's direct competition was the TG16, the Genesis, and a handful of other lesser known consoles.

The Genesis' only real direct aesthetic competitor to DKC was Vectorman, which is a good game in its own right but way less creative and fun to play than DKC (especially DKC2).

I mean, you can compare the SNES to arcade machines and high-end PCs all you want, but it's kind of a pointless debate then.

No, they really didn't, nigger.
You're the one claiming that DKC was graphically impressive in 1994. Not me. I'm just telling you that a world existed outside of Nintendo and Sega home consoles back then. Don't make claims about how great you think a game is graphically when it is on weak, archaic hardware.

What the hell is that justification?
Are you telling me that I should throw out my copies of Final Fantasy, Street Fighter. Command and Conquer, and Half Life all because OoT supposedly beats them at their own games?

>Top 100 games of all time list
>#1 [Not classic video game I love]

> confirmed autist

I honestly couldn't get into Dark Souls which is weird because I enjoyed the hell out of Demon's Souls and Bloodborne. Maybe I'm a blatant Sonyshitter at heart but DaS just didn't grab me and I feel bad because of it

i thank god everyday for making vp

List 50 games that are more deserving to be on this list.

>90

Show me an SNES running Third Strike or Metal Slug

Meh, you could have worse taste. At least you enjoy like 1/3rd of the games in the series.

Yes that's exactly what I'm saying .

In 1994 FOR THE COMPARABLE SYSTEM MARKET IT WAS SET IN.

Jesus Fkin' Christ are you retarded?

Actually, the Mega CD and 32X were already released by then and could do far better graphics and effects than the Snes. The Saturn was almost released in Japan, too. So the Snes wasn't even the best in the 'weak home consoles from the late 80s' division.