the original 151 pokemon are the best and gamefreak made the right choice by only use them in Go, prove me wrong you literally can't
The original 151 pokemon are the best and gamefreak made the right choice by only use them in Go...
gamefreak didnt make pokemon go
>I actually have opinions about the most barebones, overhyped phone app to come out in years please laugh at me
>Go
So you're just a hipster who doesn't actually like pokemone
Status: Proven wrong.
it makes a lot of sense to use a smaller number of pokemon than the 700something we have now. they could have done a sampling of all gens like they did for the gmaps thing a few years ago, but nostalgia sells
This.
New mons are confirmed, tho.
POST E'M FAGGOTS
Because job to pokemon weren't bad. It was really with black and white that the pokemon became legit trash.
is it still cuck if it's your mom
I meant to say Johto*
Go get some good quality bait, this is just shit you faggot
>Bisharp
>Thundurus
>Amoonguss
>Zoroark
>Cinccino
>Scrafty
>Darmanitan
>Whimsicott
>Serperior
>Bad
Yes you fuck
I'm just saying that the 151 are the best and the foundation of the franchise.
And none of them are as good as the 151.
Nigga those pokemon were more like digimon. Tell me that the designs of the pokemon have not evolved to a level where they're now alien.
does that mean that all people are born a cuck because you're dad fucked you're mom
you were even there when it happened
>Blastoise
>Butterfree
>Raticate
>Wigglytuff
>Gloom
>Poliwag
>Farfetch'd
>Muk
>Kingler
>Electrode
>Koffing
>Good
>the original 151 pokemon are the best
Sick opinion brah.
i love this fresh meme
I like their designs, and many of them are pretty good in combat.
Also what does it mean for a pokemon to be "more like digimon"? Digimon had great character designs and goat tier fantasy creatures.
No, it just makes you a cuck when someone beats your ass and then fucks your mom.
It's demoralizing
...
No. Slurpuff is a better designed pokemon than most mons in Gen 1.
Its an opinion so you can't really prove it wrong. It is wrong, but you can't 'prove it'.