Blizzard- We Gave Everything To You For Free, We Can Take It Away Too

gameinformer.com/b/features/archive/2016/08/24/designing-overwatch-from-titan-to-torbjorn.aspx?PostPageIndex=2
>Is there the possibility that, as characters get added to the game, older ones could be retired from the roster?

We would leave the door open to that. I think the fact that we chose the business model we did – that the game comes with all the heroes and we’re giving you everything [extra] for free so far – allows us to retire a hero without feeling bad about it. But I think we have a long way to go before heroes will need to be.

One of the other nice parts about our business model is that we’re not dependent on releasing a new hero to keep development going. That means that we don’t have the pressure to release heroes when it might not be the right decision for the game; we’re able to release heroes when players are ready for something new or it’s right for the meta to shift a little bit. We don’t have to do it just because we’re trying to push the business model forward.

tldr:
We are cucking you and you can't do anything because everything is """""free"""""

Now don't complain and buy more """""optional""""" loot boxes

>first harambe then Winston

goodbye bastion, winston, and symmetra

>tfw you didn't buy Overwatch

If you pay for the product, its free!

Those are entirely optional, though.

Removing characters is fucked up and nothing is truly free, but what do you mean?

...

...

I don't think blizzard are in any position to feel good about themselves in regards to 'free updates' when they have consistently shat on subscription paying WoW retail fags with content droughts.

Will Sombra be able to do pushups?

more than likely

>they can use this to literally kill off Overwatch characters
Im okay with this.

Can someone explain this webm please I see it all the time

...

Are you really so obsessive you must have every skin, voice line and spray in the game?

Wasnt a hard choice not to. Glad Ive found another game thats good and came out recsntly.

>removing a character that's a huge part of game's lore and promo material
they wouldn't dare touch the big monkey man

>I fall prey to sensationalism and jump on bandwagons randomly
you need to stop.

Cool, thanks

Just remember, the greed mentality spills over into gameplay too. We just got an event that was entierly "Buy loot boxes and lucio ball replaces brawls". Without microtransactions they might have given a shit and at least made the fucking medal system count in the OLYMPICS.

>have a favorite character

>grind it out to get coins to unlock skins you like

>retired

Yeah fuck you too Blizz.

if it happens though, can it be just Hanzo pls?

What would that game's title be, friend?

Bait

>OP falls for the a clickbait article and doesn't do research
>Sup Forums falls for it without fact checking.
You retards need to see

Pushups

No man's sky

See, this is part of why I can't imagine why anyone could think this is a good idea. Every hero is someone's absolute favorite part of Overwatch, and there's no good reason to remove content unless it's breaking the game, in which case, you should be nerfing and buffing to fix it, not remove it altogether.

Overwatch is a shit game anyway. It is fun for like an hour or two tops. The game only survives because of the Blizzard tag.

You retarded fucks will believe anything.

>Retiring someones fav when it's broke as shit.

>Not just giving the hero a new skillset or someshit.

Why would the former even be considered? I can understand omitting some of the cast from the inevitable Overwatch 2, but even League of Lesbians could put some new shit on an old champ.

This was already shown to be false in THE OTHER THREAD ABOUT THE SAME FUCKING TOPIC

I suppose if I tried to play it all damn day, I'd get bored quick, but it's the sort of thing I like playing a couple matches of after getting home from work. It really helps that all the heroes are unlocked and levels don't really mean anything, so I don't feel like I have to grind or get left behind.

This Sup Forums, where we make fifty threads about something and believe every word of it, especially when it's about something we hate and think is stupid. Lots of Sup Forumsirgins despise Overwatch and will jump on any chance to attack it, similar to the right and Hillary.

S
O
M
B
R
A

Y
O
U

B
E
A
N
E
R

...

Eh, your opinion. Not clicking with you doesn't mean the game is bad.

>"we left the door open"

Kaplan is such a fucking asshole. Why would that even be a consideration?

How about you don't retire my money, faggot. Keep it up, Kaplan, and I'm sure the aspies like me that waste money on your ripoff game will stop funding your hair loss treatment.

>it's a Sup Forums falls for clickbait episode

How about you read and stop being such a faggot? Fuck's sake, and people wonder why America is so low on the intelligence scale.

>tfw you bought overwatch and played it for an hour before making blizzard give you your money back because it's terrible

Not him, but I read Jeff's words and they say "we aren't retiring heroes now, but we reserve the right to in the future." If they would really never consider such a thing then Jeff would have said "we will not retire heroes" rather than be vague and say open ended shit like "currently, at this time, we do not plan on it."

Learn to read between the lines, fucknut.

>let me just not give the name because it's actually trash.

You're such a retarded faggot.

You always leave options available.

A bunch of heroes right now are old as shit. If they decide to move the games timeline forward they could replace the old heroes with younger ones.

Or maybe one of them dies in the story.

Who the fuck knows

Ah, this is the typical "Well he said maybe and we're not thinking about it right now or anytime soon but I know exactly what he meant and it's the worst-case scenario because I'm Chicken Little and the sky is fucking FALLING!!" reaction.

I don't see this as a bad thing at all.
Maybe they can get rid of Hanzo and Mei this way.

Does anyone have the TF2 vs Overwatch diversity picture?

have you never been fucked in your ass?

Just be sure to respond to it every time and if you don't see it in a thread be sure to post it.

YOU'RE a retarded faggot, half-baked lore is no reason to change gameplay for a fucking multiplayer only game. Removing characters for any reason is just fucking stupid and not what I paid for.

I'm not saying they're going to remove half the roster tomorrow, it's more that now we know the idea is in their heads and they never said they were against it, just that they aren't planning on doing it any time soon. Seeing people defend it will only make them do it sooner.

Can you really say that you would put this past actiblizz?

>Overwatchfags will defend this
Holy fugg :-DD
Good thing none of us fell for that and are all playing superior game Battleborn instead, right Sup Forums?

It's a forced meme. Ignore it.

no, THIS is a forced meme

zarya pushups are just garbage

Genji - remove completely, he's aids
Zenyetta - remove or rework, disco orb takes the fucking piss. Damage boost was Mercy's job
Hanjo - You can't fix him ever. His shitboxes can be the entire map and he'll still miss. Kill him off, have a short with him committing Sedoku.

>be Mccree main
>Mccree constantly getting nerfed every update even though he's fine.
>always adjusting to nerfs/buffs
>tfw they'll probably say "fuck it" and just take him out so the nerf babies will shut up and they don't have to work hard.

Has there been a game where its detractors have been more BTFO?
>y-y-you'll have to buy new characters
everything is free
>i-i-it's going to be dead on arrival
one of the most successful blizzard launches to date
>i-i-it's going to be dead in a month
is the most popular online game in a lot of places and has even overtaken LoL in Korea and China

Even the only legitimate complaint of 20 tick rate servers is being fixed. But assblasted Sup Forumsirgins who want their next tortanic just move the goalposts everytime they are proven wrong.

>one of the most successful blizzard launches to date

But I wanted Lost vikings 3.

Tfw you are making profit out of nerds.

this happened since forever with LoL and Dota "reworks" or "kit updates" where they basically replaced characters completely changing their mechanics while keeping the name and visuals, but now that blizzard does it withot trying to hide it it's REEEEEE time

...

>free

I PAID 40 TO 60 BUCKS FOR THIS "FREE" GAME

Its not free assholes

leaving the door open means that there s a possibility for that in the future, contradicting what he just said here.

There is no contradiction. He's saying they have no plans now or in the forseeable future. So you can all stop whining about your favorite hero suddenly disappearing tomorrow or Saturday of in five years.

Overwatch would be so much better if it was 4v4.

Nah, needs some 12 v 12 action.