Your opinion on Spyro 2

Your opinion on Spyro 2

Improved on the 1st one gameplay wise, but also kinda lost it's surreal charm in the process.

詰らない.

Why do you keep making these threads?

Super great game, I only played it this year & regret that I never played it (or the other 2) sooner.

better than the first except for the music

also TROUBLE WITH THE TROLLEY EH?

weakest of the first 3 but that's just my opinion

>katakana for 'spyro' looks like english letters for 'ripto'
Was that on purpose?
Ripto's name, I mean.

The actual platforming and stuff is really good.

Some of the side missions and mini-games are like hemorrhoids in gameplay form.

私の骨をガラガラしないでください!

Ripto's name is based on the appearance of the lettering in Spyro's japanese title

No joke, it actually is how he got his name.

Jesus, I would have loved to have been in the room when they came up with that.

this is somewhat ingenious

Probably had the best story and best villain.
Probably the best.
1 is the worst, it's just lacking some features.
3 having you have all the upgrades by default kinda sucked, but getting so many alternative characters to play as was an excellent way to mix it up and it also helped conclude the story for a lot of characters. The first two bosses are also amazing. However, it had too much shit like the firefly and boxing minigames.
So, all three are amazing ames, but 2 had the least flaws and probably the best story of the lot (introduction to a lot of characters who stuck and a good villain).

Not to mention 1's bosses were by far the worst.

Fun, but took the tone of the series from "whimsical game with an original universe and artstyle inspired by popular trends in fantasy books and movies at the time" to "Saturday morning cartoon game with some annoying fuckoff bipedal animal mascots and a universe that consists of a bunch of inconsistent themes joined together with portals".

Yeah, what was with that anyway? At least Spyro 1's worlds made sense they were connected together. But Spyro 2's worlds were a bunch of mish mash put together. What was the deal anyway? In Spyro 1 the flora and fauna attack Spyro or Gnorcs but in Spyro 2 they never explain why the other creatures attack him, from what I remember it had something to do with ripto's influence over the hub world or something, never really made sense to me. The only characters i liked were the fauns in the alchemist world.

i spyro oryginal trilogy they best game on the world

spyro was always trash

3 games in as many years, they might have had to rush the later 2.

>but also kinda lost it's surreal charm in the process.

Agreed.

>Improved on the 1st one gameplay wise

I don't know. The mini-games are nice, but the level design and sense of adventure did not improve.

Tondemo is the best Spyro game

Releasing Spyro 3 on an actual year of the dragon (2000) was too good to pass up after all

I find i bizarre when people claim that SNES games apparently looked better than this but we were just so duped by the novelty of 3D that we didn't notice. It was only pseudo-realism focused games that actually looked shoddy at the time.