This is not a real battlefield game because it isn't like bf4

>this is not a real battlefield game because it isn't like bf4
>it uses the same engine as battlefront
>battlefield 1, more like battlefront 2 Xd

Why is the battlefield fanbase literally dumber than cod?

Battlefield stopped being good after 2142. Some people haven't realized this yet.

>it uses the same engine as battlefront

and also Battlefield 4, Need for Speed, Mass Effect Andromeda, Mirror's Edge Catalyst. Your point is?

i dont feel like im really in WW1 with all these vehicles and planes

i feel like im just playing BF4 without the shitty filter in a desert and less equipment, and older guns

Making Battlefield WW1 was stupid to begin with.

They are trying to please modern shooter fans with a setting that has nothing modern shooter fans like.

Look at the ingame models and you'll see what the intended demographic for the game is.

>WHY DONT PEOPLE LIKE THE GAME GOD THIS FAN BASE IS CANCER HOW CAN THEY NOT LIKE THE THIGN

The first world war had some really mobile and chaotic action family computer

that's cool but it's not translated in game very well

>Objective Apples
heh that's clever
>Objective Butter
hah really funny
>Objective Charlie
oh.. that was all? they ran out of ideas already?
not even Coney or something?

blame the eternal swede

>objectevie cuck
hee hee

objective Cuck

No war have been translated to a game very well so your point is moot.

ohh hoo hee

schnap

Get a load of these anons.

Because they think they are somehow aloof from all other franchises. The Battlefield fanbase is probably the worst of the lot right now. Any glaring criticism of Battlefield 1 is literally met with "LOL COD KID DETECTED GO BACK TO INFINITE GAYFARE".

I have no idea what you're talking about

Bf4 is on a older engine

Can't say I'm surprised.

did they finally get rid of the shitty web browser server shit?
i dont want to have fucking Chrome open on my PC when i play this

no

>a war that introduced trenchwarfare
>not a singel trench in sight

wew lad

This

holy fucking shit
skipping this one too

I actually quite like it compared to the close-quarters arcade-y combat of Call of Duty, my only problem with it is the lack of historical accuracy. By which I mean how common automatic weapons are in the game. And all the black people.

no fuck you run over to that objective

It looks absolutely gorgeous. It's a shame the game itself is total trash.

don´t listen to that retard, the game uses it's own ingame browser.

>battlefield kids think this looks impressive or good

>trench warfare
>WWI invention

>only 2 anti-tank grenades
>not enough to take them out
>tanks spawn like pancakes on sunday morning
>if you dont have a tank you might as well just die and respawn in one
vehicles ruined the game

So is Battlefront. Each game has a unique newer/older version of the engine.

Bad Company 2 was still good.

BF3 was alright.

>bad company 2
>good

Go boot up BC2 on pc
Try walking in a diagonal direction

they did, it has an ingame browser now

>Bad Company 2
Baby's first Battlefield.

Shit doesn't even have planes. It's not a Battlefield game without some jets soaring through.

>did they finally get rid of the shitty web browser server shit?
They're actually updating BF4 to also use an in-game browser as well.
I don't understand why so late.

it's not a battlefield game you are right, doesnt mean it's a bad game though. they should've just dropped the Battlefield name and just named it BadCompany 2 instead.

>It's not a Battlefield game without some jets soaring through

funny, I didn't see any jets in BF1942

...

if they slow down tanks, remove automatic weapons and black people ill play it

It's a beta, and they aren't. Why would you play these EA games on release is beyond me, wait it out to see how well they patch it.

Also Titanfall 2 is in the same boat for me sadly, game might die from COD stealing it's thunder. Possible because of how fucking slow you move in Titanfall 2.

Battlefront wasn't very buggy on release or even during the open beta, jut had balance issues.

I mean hey the game was a piece of shit but you can't knock it for not running well.

Because they buy EA games.

Now that's something I can totally agree with. I hate when brands try to ride on a series popularity and make games that have nothing to do with the series, even though they might be good.
It's a wasted opportunity to make a good new IP.

Anybody else having trouble with Origin in-game?
I have it enabled but when I launch BF1 it never shows up when I hit Shift+F1

On the Eastern front, which EA has ignored

Airplanes... there, happy?

..You can without a problem. What's your point

It's more of a spin off.

You are confusing the battlefield audience in general with a few contrarian retards on Sup Forums.

>he didn't play Secrets Weapons of WW2

get out

Some fuckface probably only now just got ousted from the regime when everything had to look like Chinese F2P shit at EA. Or they just moved him to mobile, where he belongs.

That said, I played the demo and did not have fun, and re-uninstalled Origin.

Reminds me a lot of Bad Company 2 in the sandstorm part.

The fuck? Is this a bug or were they hoping players wouldn't notice (like Sean Murray pbuh)

For some reason overgame relays don't detect it.
MSI Afterburner doesn't detect it either.

gotta get it running on consoles somehow

its funny because COD has actually attempted to evolve and improve its franchise in recent years quite drastically.

DICE on the other hand simply slap a new skin on each bf game and are hailed as REVOLUTIONARY

>I'll make up false statements nobody has ever made so I can pretend this game is not trash
Yeah BF fanboys are pretty fucking retarded tbqh, especially when they get all defensive about a shit game.

trenches would make snipers useless comrade. do you not want to sprint across miles of open ground and stand around capping a flag like a sitting duck while BONGSMOKE420X takes shots at you from the cliffs?

BFBC2 was ok, breddy good spin off, it had proper speed,

BF3 was shit

BF4 was shit-ok

still most hours went into BF2 and 2142, new games doesn't have that epicness in them, its just all fake "dude whoa explosions parachute battlefield moments"

Real battlefield was about teamwork, you as a squad leader capping flags watching your comrades struggle as you fight for every inch

It's because everyone is sick of a COD game coming out every year, while BF games "only" release in a 2-3 year intervall. It's just perception.

When does the beta end?

>I'll make up false statements nobody has ever made so I can pretend this game is not trash
spend one minute in the youtube comment section or battlelog, I dare you

I only really played them during free weekends, but I tended to enjoy the more recent Call of Dutys' bizarre snake-eating-its-own-tail direction of turning itself into a slower Quake clone, over the post-BC2 samey-ness of running for an hour from a base to an objective, only to be popped by someone way the fuck away.

how the fuck do you get a gun without a scope or that nasty bullshit RDS equivalent?

>this is not a real battlefield game because it isn't like bf4
who the fuck says that? They havent been battlefield since bad company and theyve been shit games since 3

>WW1 tank
>Moving that fast

What the fuck

I can't unlock anything in this piece of shit and I'm stuck with the terrible starting weapons while others are running around with upgraded shit. What the fuck is wrong with dice?

> COD has actually attempted to evolve and improve its franchise in recent years quite drastically
mfw the last three cod games are all futuristic and look almost identical
nice try though.

On the scout class, guns ending with rifleman are without a scope.

So, can some gun historians enlighten me? Am I missing the shotguns, were shotguns not in military use as of World War I, or was this the one bit of historical accuracy DICE and EA stuck to?

battlefield.com/career

You can unlock weapons on there
Assault has shotguns, you just need to unlock them

>you just need to unlock them
pff, fuck that

t. hasn't played any of them

>yfw you get the flamethrower for the first time

The storms pick up randomly. I like it because it makes it harder for scouts and tanks to see infantry. I think it blocks spotting as well.

the last cod games have added jetpacks, sliding and dashing. which completely changed the dynamics of the entire game. advanced warfare also had a laser rifle very similar to quakes lightning gun (which sucked but i thought it was awesome the devs were trying new things)

the most recent one also introduced specialist abilities and a competitive arena mode, and wallrunning/parkour

the newest one looks like its going to have zero g combat and a non linear story

so....what has bf done to change up its gameplay in the last 3 titles?

>You can unlock weapons on there
I can't, I'm rank 10 but in each class it says rank 0 and I can't unlock anything that requires rank 1 or above.

It's superbly underpowered, with people being able to bayonet through flames before dying

>get sniped immediately

My biggest killstreaks have been with the flamethrower. I feel like a machine of death with one.

I think he meant that you can only spring forward in BC2, which is, indeed, annoying as fuck, because BC2 is not a goddamn tactical shooter.

Actually its more battlefield than 4. It resembles the older ones more since tanks are more overpowred and prevents people from running in the middle of the street and thus makes buildings vital to hold

3/4 of characters in this game are niggers

It's actually a lot of fun, but so are most BF games. Hardline was even fun as well. My issue is it just feels like another BF game. The guns feel so modern and there's nothing that makes me feel like I'm in WWI. I'd rather this just be Bad Company 3 with a modern setting.

The looming fact that it'll all be separated with DLC is also an issue.

Battlefield/Call of Duty aren't video games.
Please go discuss them on another board, thank you.

It's the way the Royal Navy named objectives from the war

I quite like it, not sure I understand any of the hate. The gameplay is good and I'm enjoying the map more than I enjoyed literally any BF3 and 4 maps.

Only thing I don't like is the leftists game devs at DICE making every European soldier a negroid or paki. I don't like politics in my games, especially anti-white Marxist politics.

If you seriously give a shit bout the race of characters over the gameplay, you're seriously autistic.

That said, the gameplay is mediocre, so it's a reason to dodge the game anyway. If you told anyone outside of Sup Forums you didn't get the game for this reason, they'd think you were a moron.

Its a decent Battlefield game, its a shit WWI game

The features are there, but they're useless or just skins for things already in other games.
gas should be a bigger feature instead of a recoloured smoke grenade

theyre literally all the same game after mw. everybody grew up with cod, its idiotic to imply someone on here didnt play any of them

flamethrower guy is supposed run around and clear buildings in the town at C. I went on a 10 kill rampage last night.

>they added (x mechanic), now the fundamentally terrible game is good!
lol

thats not the argument

>run to C
>friend kicks door open
>spray the room with white hot death
>6 kills
>mfw

>its idiotic to imply someone on here didnt play any of them
Not really, Sup Forums is full of bandwagon CoD haters, more so than with Battlefield. CoD threads get shat on pretty much every time unless it isn't talking about Black Ops.

Also see >they added new mechanics
>he tells you to say new thing battlefield has done
>b-but CoD still sux lol

Really?

fuck off shill

>shoot mans game is too simple and boring

[Add fast move to shoot mans while move fast]

>its not a visual novel and tycoon sim so it's still shit!