Implying it's not $60 for cod4 remastered and $20 for infinite warfare

>implying it's not $60 for cod4 remastered and $20 for infinite warfare

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=8Emcn6o52Ac
youtube.com/watch?v=k8sig4k_kho
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

>Implying I want to spend an extra $20 for Infinite Warfare
>Implying it wouldn't be better if they sold them as standalones

I'd much prefer standalones, iw looks interesting but I don't know how to feel after how much of a disaster BO3 was

>removing the 4 from the title
Why?

Faggots. Because Raven is faggots.

>implying you can't get infinite warfare and the Cod 4 remaster on pc for $66 cad on cd keys

I could not be more disgusted by IW. I am so fucking done with "characters" and "abilities" in fucking CoD. If I wanted characters and abilities I'd play fucking overwatch.

Activision needs to understand:
>Call of Duty is not a Sci-fi franchise
>Call of Duty is not made more interesting by shitty and annoying abilities/characters

The fact that they're hiding CoD 4 behind Infinite Warfare is the worst thing they've ever done. Aside from raping the entire franchise that is.

>this franchise I don't own is exactly what I say it is

>Implying it wouldn't be better if they sold them as standalones
They probably will later down the line, some time before Christmas.

By that logic CoD isn't a modern warfare franchise either, fagballs.

It's more like classes, in which you can customize most likely. I'm using Warfighter because it's the AR/sub class and your killstreaks don't reset when you die.

The franchise has been in a steady quality decline since Black Ops 2.

Black Ops 3 with all the characters and abilities is the all time low. I'm looking forward to Infinite Warfare somehow making it even worse.

>The franchise has been in a steady quality decline since Black Ops 2.
Weird that it's still selling so well then, huh?

> and your killstreaks don't reset when you die

Are you fucking serious

It's overhyped AAA garbage, of course it's selling well.

Hey man, if the masses want to eat shit every year and then go back to the last game because it's "better", let them.

There's an entire diagram about this. They never learn.

>IW isn't the most advanced CoD

I take this extended movement over getting insta-ko'd out of nowhere in an old CoD anyday.

Then why would they listen to you?

>sales = quality

They won't, the series is slowly killing itself. Ironically the "CoD Killer" everyone's been looking for is CoD itself.

They fucked up the remaster anyways it's just Advanced warfare designed to look like cod4

youtube.com/watch?v=8Emcn6o52Ac

>implying it's any amount of money for those garbage games

Who are you quoting?

I don't understand why they changed the sounds for everything

Guns and explosions sounds muffled and like they're plastic

>slowly killing itself
>just as popular if not more more popular than its ever been

you can mouse over quotes newfriend.

Your implications

>people genuinely think they'll permanently hide the remaster behind the Infinite Warfare paywall
just wait, you retarded apes

Is this bait

Not true at all, MW3 sold the most copies, the series has been declining in sales over time. BO3 is the only excpetion to this.

Did you link the wrong post? Because that quote isn't there.

You need to get better at reading implications.

Quality vs sales has nothing to do with the fact that you have no say in what a series "should" be when it's commercially successful.

Here's another video of the Ak 47.. it sounds like shit compared to the original

youtube.com/watch?v=k8sig4k_kho

PSA: If you actually defend, or unironically like futuristic CoD's, you are the problem, and need to fuck off of my franchise. Faggots.

He's implying that the decline in quality doesn't exist because the games are still selling, maybe you just need to work on your reading comprehension.

t. muh boots on da ground child

The only recent CoD with bad sales compared to how it usually sold was Ghosts. IW is looking to have very good sales with 150k pre-orders so far

that's the 74u, though, that's always sounded weird

it just sounds worse in this

>$60 for a remake with less content than the original and only thing improved are the graphics
cod fans will pay for this

you're right, they should have kept doing nondescript middle eastern countries and the russians

You got it backwards, underage.

I'm surprised people aren't pissed off at AV for canceling the cod endowment because people wanted to play cod 4 and not the future shit

No I'm not.

Its confiemed to have all the maps remade now, not just 10.

That's what you said, so maybe you just don't understand the words you're typing.

Yes. What's wrong with that?

>implying
you're the type of faggot who cried "me want future fighting" after you got sick of ghosts, then after two games of future bullshit you now cry for "me want boots on ground again"

but you never want world war ii, you just want modern bullshit again to repeat the cycle

10 at launch and the rest later, they haven't said whether you have to pay for them or not and since this is Call of Duty we're talking about here you probably do.

Yes you are

>BO3
>disaster
Black Ops 3 was a great entry, it was just held back because it's a call of duty title with activision jewish schemes.

IW looks one to one like a copy of BO3 with cheaper animation that resemble a korean f2p fps

>not even reading posts before you reply to them

Me explaining what I actually said was in the post your incorrect assumptions fucking replied to. How can anyone be this stupid?

The second part of the post was aimed at someone else, so why should i?

100 dollar version has the season pass. Does the season pass cover it?

>actually admitting you didn't even read the post you replied to
see

>you're the type of faggot who cried "me want future fighting" after you got sick of ghosts, then after two games of future bullshit you now cry for "me want boots on ground again"

Like hell I did, faggot. I never asked for this faggotry. Ghosts was a mistake, yes, but not because of the setting. When ghosts turned out to be shit, I didn't bitch and moan for the future, I went back and played MW2 for another year.

If I ever wanted future I'd play Halo or something. I never asked for future in CoD.

It doesn't matter, what you said to begin with is not what you said later, you implied that the declining quality doesn't exist because the games are still selling. I'm guessing English isn't your first launguage otherwise you would have noticed that.

You realize the gameplay is still CoD right? It doesn't matter that it's future. If you want actual Halo CoD play Halo 5.

>look mommy I posted it again
Underage can't into 3D movement

Can't we prebuy the game and just return it after they give us the early access to MW in October?

>you implied that the declining quality doesn't exist because the games are still selling.
I implied declining quality doesn't matter to the company when they're still making money, so crying that a series "should" be something different is just shitting your diaper with no understanding of how the industry works.
Stop being a retard and stop reading things that aren't there.

You said that not me

Instead of spouting "who are you quoting" you should have just explained yourself then and there, instead you actively encouraged being ignored because of your stupidity/shitposting through refusing to notice what your post implied.

>You realize the gameplay is still CoD right?

Not the kind of CoD I loved.

>every CoD is the same!
>this CoD is too different
You fucks need to be gassed

>Instead of spouting "who are you quoting" you should have just explained yourself then and there
If you wanted that then you should have properly explained yourself first instead of greentext memepost strawmanning. Shitpost in, shitpost out.

Only every cod after and including 4

Shitposting in reply to shitposting makes you just as bad as him user.

>get shut down
>call it shit posting

nobody asked for future cod. i've been playing the series since 2 first came out, and i can't remember anybody asking for that. that was a decision that the devs made on their own. and it was a bad one.

So you take the time to formulate educated, cleanly spelled out responses to every shitpost you see? How well does that go?
That isn't how it works.
If you want effort from your responses, put effort into your posts.

>falling for remaster trash
>cod

lmfao

You adding to the shitpostring pile does nothing to stem the flow of shitposting, if anything you're just making it worse.

but cod is fun

The impact on the quality of the thread is irrelevant to whether or not someone should expect a legitimate response to their shitpost.

Seems like all these future cods are more for the MLG and competitive crowd rather than the normal players

The only thing about Blops 3 that is a disaster is COD points, but that can't be avoided at this point.

You shouldn't respond at all.

>realize you misunderstood something and have no comeback
>continue crying and parroting the opposite to save face

>that guy that uses this gunperk

That seems OP ?

Oh how iconic

>The CoD community is one person

The people crying about it being the same weren't the fans anyway. They were the "le true gamers" who like Skyrim and The Last of Us, and didn't even play CoD.

Now our franchise is fucked because Activision listened to them instead of the people who actually play their games.

they did this with the original CoD and MW2. Wait 6 months, they'll release MW1 as standalone, with a $15 DLC for the extra 6 maps that people who bought the legendary edition get.

i'm buying the $100 edition cause IW looks pretty good. Still salty about the awful movement system from blops 3 but oh well, what can you do. It looks like specialists are being tweaked a bit.

Black ops 2 had the record for day one sales until GTA v crushed it

It depends on the situation, if someone is behind cover and you can only shoot at their head/upper body you won't be able to get headshot damage with the weapon, but in close encounters it would be a decent advantage depending on how large the hitbox is.

BO3 came out before Overwatch.

>Raven has been reduced to just helping with Cawaduty

kill me

>you can make your gun do more damage if you shoot someone's dick
i don't know why i want this

I bet if Infinite Warfare didn't have the Call of Duty name, people would be praising it more than Titanfall 2. Maybe if they went
>"From the Creators of Call of Duty. Infinity Ward proudly presents Infinite Warfare"

Instead of
>"Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare"

Both normies and the faggots here would be okay

>I enjoy paying $120 a year for the same game that never changes in a significant way
I wouldn't want to be associated with this shitty franchise. Zombies were the last good thing about any of them and AW started cheapening it. IW will be the final blow to any credibility this series has, but not because it's in space. You do realize it's just going to be a linear campaign with a few "helicopter" missions added in right? Everyone will bitch about it being too different when it's exactly the fucking same + cheap gravity effects

None of the normies would buy it without the call of duty tag line

>he never played combat arms
NUTSHOT
NUTSHOT
NUTSHOT

As dumb as that sounds it actually happened when MW2 was announced they didn't put call of duty in the early promos and people either got confused or angry that it wasn't a cod game

If its the same like you suggest, then what do you propose would make it different? Normies are already chimping out on it now

I think that's actually a referance to earlier CoD games when there was a bug where the kill notification in the killfeed would sometimes show that you killed them with a headshot if you shot them in the bollocks.

They should stop making one every year, pool all their resources and let Treyarch take the lead as they seem to be the only Devs actually trying something new

I would
>make a campaign with real branching story arcs that can't be finished in an afternoon
>make co op an option in some way through most of the campaign, even if it's not two people on the ground
>get rid of COD points and the "freemium" guns that come with it (they should be free with the dlc packs if they want to add them)
>bring back special ops
>add classic modes to multiplayer to satisfy everyone
>also bring back cod 4s old school mode
If they really want to do something with that mountain of cash they are sitting on, they could do a game that has a ww2 and a modern/future campaign in one, with different loadouts in multiplayer for different time periods. It would be the ultimate COD but they won't make it because making a complete game that they really had to put effort into won't make them money the next year.

So your suggestion, to innovate cod....is to get the edgiest dev to keep the same shit, but strip down MP to bare bones, and add shit to campaign that few people care about. Fucking genius 10/10

ak 74u

An EXTREME minority buys CoD for the campaign. Everyone else buys it for mp and zombies.

WHAT HAVE THEY DONE TO THE SOUNDS