Is there a video game character faster than Mario?

Is there a video game character faster than Mario?

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=R8X7Vj6JXPk
youtube.com/watch?v=0NA_Nq7oZZU
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem
stayorswitch.com/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

The marathon man in Ocarina of Time is ALWAYS faster than you.
Even if you hack the game, he beats you in negative time.

...

theres no such thing as a half a press

a button only exists in two states: either activated or unactivated it can't be in between

you can hack ocarina of time?

Fuck off, """"""""'''''''''''Henry""""""""'''''''''''.

The driver in Big Rigs

iirc doomguy runs at something like 60mph

That's baby speed. Mario has been recorded walking backwards at 133 miles per second, and can potentially go even faster.

For reference, at that speed he could moonwalk around the world in a little more than three minutes.

>Mario reaches infinite speed in one of the latest Pannenkoek videos

No, there is not.

This is the best answer possible desu, even if you include space games where ships travel at FTL speeds the truck in Big Rigs can travel hundreds of times the speed of light.

youtube.com/watch?v=R8X7Vj6JXPk

We've been over this. Mario can move at infinite speed, not even the flash can catch up

Which Mario are we talking about?

Not infinite. Mario is faster.

Can someone please explain this infinite speed thing?

Holy Pasta

God damn I legit love pannenkoek's videos. There's something so relaxing about them, it's hard to explain what. And seeing all this crazy shit happen in Mario 64 never gets old

youtube.com/watch?v=0NA_Nq7oZZU

The big rig can go several thousand light years in an attosecond
that's faster then the Flash can react at his best

AND I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT REGULAR MARIOS

>faster
No Mario can reach infinite speed though Youmu from 2hu MiH from jojo and Human Race flash could catch up to him

Sure, but first we need to talk about parallel universes.

They all reach infinite speed and then the universe turns white for a second before it collapses into an infinitely large and infinitely heavy black hole with infinite gravity that will collapse on itself endlessly, the universe ceases to exist.

Luigi?

...

The Doom Guy from the Original Doom.

I thought it was negative infinite speed?

>Three parts
>We can divide that in half!
What a shit joke.

that's because the third part, the release, has no practical use.

Are the people who still don't understand what "0.5 A presses" actually means after having it explained super fucking clearly in both the video and every single thread baiting, or just retarded?

watch the video fag

We utilize the bite from the previous meal
By holding the food in our mouth between meals we bypass the initial "bite" in the meal and are able to chew our food from the previous meal.

It's not infinite speed, it's just the value that the float variable hits if it goes beyond it's maximum possible real value. Hitting it also causes SM64 to crash.

Worse, they are "Henry"s

>that video

fucking kek

That's exactly the same thing that happens to the truck in Big Rigs, that's why it gives you the winner screen when it happens.
Big Rigs truck is as fast as Mario (infinite speed), but Mario reaches that speed faster, so Mario wins

Garrett in Thief Gold.

Can someone please post the crying """"""""henry""""""""" wojac picture?

...

...

>you can't say the probability changes when you reveal doors
that's wrong though. if you have 100 doors you have a 1 in 100 chance of picking the correct door. if 98 of the doors that are wrong are opened then you have a 1 in 2 chance of picking the correct door since you only have two options now.

...

here we go again...
If you switch, you invert the propability of your first roll, because you always end up with the opposite of what you picked initially.
So the 1/100 chance to win in the first round becomes a 99/100 to win if you switch.

Could you explain?

>have two options, A or B.
>one is correct, the other is wrong.
>this is somehow not 50/50 because you did an earlier equation that eliminated X other options.

I'm struggling to explain it without repeating myself, so just read this
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monty_Hall_problem
I know it's hard to learn the basics of propability but just try.

>I know it's hard to learn the basics of probability
yes, you're clearly struggling to understand how two separate equations have nothing to do with each other.

get a friend and test it empirically using cups and a ball or something.

is there a video that ruined a fanbase faster?

You should cup your friend's balls considering you're the type of faggot who replies to obvious bait.

so you DIDN'T read it.
oh well, can't win them all.

retard

Pick any recent Game Theory video

The theory is incorrect. If you you have two doors left it's 50/50.

That's just how it is. it's fact, not theory.

CJ because you know hes black

Who would win:
Mario with 2 days of corner crouch walking prep time
VS
The flash

Empirical evidence and repeated experimentation disagree.

you people are hilarious.
You're not picking a door, you're switching the door.
The door you currently have is based on your previous draw.
So switching results in just an inversion of your already picked result, which in turn is subject to the initial propability.
oh and this too
>After the problem appeared in Parade, approximately 10,000 readers, including nearly 1,000 with PhDs, wrote to the magazine, most of them claiming vos Savant was wrong (Tierney 1991). Even when given explanations, simulations, and formal mathematical proofs, many people still do not accept that switching is the best strategy (vos Savant 1991a). Paul Erdős, one of the most prolific mathematicians in history, remained unconvinced until he was shown a computer simulation confirming the predicted result (Vazsonyi 1999).

Instead of three, imagine 1000 doors. You're asked to pick one at random. I then open 998 doors. Would you stay with your original choice out of 1000?

it's not theory you baiting piece of shit, you can run a simulation and get 33/66

stayorswitch.com/

here's a large scale simulation

An explosives disposal expert is attempting to defuse a bomb. there are three wires, red, yellow, and black. he has already cut the yellow wire. he doesn't know which of the two remaining wires will detonate the bomb, but he thinks the black one is the correct choice, what are the odds that cutting the red wire will cause the bomb to defuse?

That's not even remotely the same.

Thanks for demonstrating how little you grasp the underlying concept though, means I can safely ignore you now.

that's not the correct model.
the third door is removed by someone who knows the contents.
all doors have the same propability, so there is no "he thinks the black one is the correct choice".
you're just showing your ignorance.

no bully, pls

>that one fucking asshole who derails the thread in an attempt to fuel his pedantic erection.

sorry I couldn't resist.
And if anything, started it by being an idiot.

Well you could disregard the earlier equation and pick a door assuming a 50/50 chance that works, but if there was a hundred door in the earlier equation and you picked one that would give you a 99% of being wrong. So rather than gamble on the 50% chance in the new equation, you should gamble on 99% in the old one and change door.

...

Here's your example in a way that actually makes sense:
An explosives disposal expert is attempting to defuse a bomb. there are three wires, red, yellow, and black. He has to cut 2 of the wires or the bomb will explode. He has no idea which wire does what and chooses the yellow wire completely at random. He is about to cut the yellow wire when the guy who built the bomb comes along and cuts the red wire, knowing that it will not detonate the bomb.

In 2 out of 3 cases, the yellow wire WILL detonate the bomb. Feel free to build 100 bombs and try it with a friend for empirical evidence.

>started it by being an idiot.

You are even more retarded if you actually believe he didn't know what he was doing, which is why this is all your fault and not his.

I kind of enjoyed it though, does that make me a bad person?

>it's different because someone else already knows the answer
the vietnamese have captured you and one of your brothers in arms. there are three pistols on the table, two have a live round in them, the other is loaded with a blank. they tell you to pick one. one of the VC picks up one of the pistols you did not choose and executes your fellow soldier with it. they tell you to pick again from the remaining two pistols, if you choose correctly you live for another day. what are the odds you will choose correctly?

You're more likely to pick the live gun the first round, so switch.
2/3 if you switch, 1/3 if you don't.

But he slows down in Super Mario Sunshine.

>knowing that it will not detonate the bomb
This detail gets left out too often, and it changes everything. You can tell that the yellow wire is likely to detonate it based on the fact that the bomb maker knows more than you and didn't go for it. If he had just gone for a random one, it wouldn't have made a difference.

For everyone who can argue there is something who can move at infinite speed and rival Mario: when has infinity ever equaled infininty?

multiples sets of infinities can have different sizes.

>thread desolves into some Zero Escape hypothetical bullshit
I love it

Mario runs so fast he exits his universe.

I feel like both sides of this argument are trying to act like they are trolling the other side, but its just ending up a shitshow. (4chin in a nutshell)

That Jojo reference!

Them Japs sure love Jojo.

Precisely. Infinity is by definition an insanely high constant number that we cannot comprehend. Who's to say that one infinate ly large number equals another? That being said, if Mario runs at infinite speed, you could easily state his speed cannot be replicated by principle alone.

It's not an argument, it's basic probability theory

the monty hall problem is well researched and understood though.
It's just unintuitive.

So that's why he tries to conserve a presses. When he is allowed to press a, shit like this happens...
He's too powerful

You're at a party and three girls want your dick. there is a white brunette girl, african girl with a perm, and a white girl with hair dyed neon blue with yellow highlights. your wingman and best friend is sober enough to tell you two of them have HIV, but too drunk to think about telling you which ones they are. he already has HIV and does you a favor by taking the brunette, who he knows has HIV. the two remaining girls are all over you now. what are the odds you will contract HIV?

I'm having a lot of fun trying to come up with monty hall scenarios that don't involve the stupid goats/car thing, but I'm running out of ideas.

>not having all 250 coins

did you pick one before he removed the third? If so then yes it's the monty hall problem again.
Another thing though. HIV is not always HIV. it mutates so fast that each human has actually different strains of it, so you can get infected again from another person, and basically have double the chance of an AIDS outbreak.
Also fuck these friends, they're the worst.

...

wrong, the correct answer is 100% because you're taking that threesome all the way into next week.

hell yeah...?

F U C K P O L E S
U
C
K

P
O
L
E
S

damn that's amazing, one of the few things that fucks up no A press runs are poles, because there's no way to get out of them without pressing A.

So is TTC and WMUtR the only stages you need to A press with?

what's the point of holding A down if you're not going for a single press at all? is it some kind of mulligan, like you get one use of the A button, but that's it?

Mario floating on an egg over the sea.

The point is actually to do the game with the least A press possible, and you can't get into some stages without jumping in first.

Basically you jump in a stage, and hold A once you're in it.

The final goal would be to be able to complete the game without pressing A once.

yeah, but if you need to press A at specific points in a level why hold it down after jumping in? you're still going to have to use the A button again, why does it matter whether or not you tap the button normally?

...

Because holding it can still have some uses, in his video his example is taking the wing cap, falling from a platform and holding A to slowly fall down in a lower platform. Holding A and pressing B can do some other moves like kicks and stuff which can be used to gain some height.

That being said sometimes you do have to press A again in a level but he just tries to make the most out of all A presses.

It's true that any method that requires the button to be held down doesn't get him any closer to the goal of 0 presses, but I think he's just focusing on the process of eliminating A presses one at a time right now, instead of the far distant goal of 0 presses. Basically, when he's eliminated all the A presses except the one he needs to hold down, he can start to investigate whether he can eliminate that too or to be satisfied with a 1 A press run. Or more likely, he'll never get there, so the best he can do is show us how few A presses he can do it with.