Are we on the brink of achieving protorealism in gaming?

Are we on the brink of achieving protorealism in gaming?

Other urls found in this thread:

wccftech.com/sweeney-need-40-tflops-render-photo-realistic-dynamic-environments-humans-require-computing-power/
youtu.be/wIl2-5f8NTo
youtu.be/iP8EgMUVmwk
youtube.com/watch?v=s6nMz2x4vs4
youtube.com/watch?v=0ZZquVylLEo
youtube.com/watch?v=_fAw8KcGjMg
twitter.com/NSFWRedditGif

but that qt is real

Would take too much processing power and man hours to animate and model currently. If you mean "brink" as another 30 years, then I guess

The next generation of porn games looks bright.

>dat hair clipping

Yeah

>hair clipping
what? where?

>tfw photorealistic lolis soon

For facial models and expressions yeah. Everything else, not even close.

Why bother?

It will certainly happen in our lifetimes (assuming people are around 25 here)

>capcom
Deep Down when?

For facial rendering we're already past the uncanny valley once you're past around 3 subsurface scattering layers, biggest issue now is shitty animations because every dev insists on being lazy and using tracking shit which never maps correctly and always looks janky as fuck.

if makeup plastered gooks is your idea of realism then yes

AM I STILL TO CREATE THE PERFECT SYSTEM SYSTEM?

But that's illegal.

Wouldn't computer generated CP stop pedos from hurting actual children though?

I'm not really looking forward to it if it does happen
It would just be too weird, especially in violent shit

In our hearts she is real and that's what matters.

We cant even get wind or proper hit boxes that arent rectangles

We're not even on the brink of achieving it in film and some of that takes years to render in renderfarms.

So no, you dumb faggot.

Yes, i can wait for my games to contain even less gameplay and yet have longer dev cycles.

No, if anything it would only help promoting paedophilia.

not even close
why are you people such braindead idiots

wccftech.com/sweeney-need-40-tflops-render-photo-realistic-dynamic-environments-humans-require-computing-power/

An experience like you've never had before.
An experience like you've never had before.
An experience like you've never had before.

youtu.be/wIl2-5f8NTo

This. Gotta love dem cinematic experiences! That's what videogames are all about!

Nice meme article.

Thanks for reminding me that I will die alone.

Honestly, if you want anything remotely close to that, it's either going to come from Sony or Bandai Namco Entertainment.

Bandai picked up the FOX Engine creator, and are already receiving a ton of tech funding money for Summer Lesson and other VR games.

lel, I remember when they were pushing for PBR saying it was going to bring photorealism
we still have shit animation, shit textures and vaseline on the screen because muh movie blur effects

>The hardest part was achieving the moist, soft and translucent skin of girls this age.

We can already create rendered photorealistic static images. But it's only that: a realistic photo / background / overlay whatever.

Once you add motion and movement, everything falls apart.

To answer your question:
>Are we on the brink of achieving protorealism in "GAMING"?

No, we are not. The level of detail needed to achieve full real time photorealism takes too much processing power.

Photorealism in gaming is the most boring shit EEEVER!!!!!!

I don't give a shit about photoreaslm. I play games to excape reality. fuck photorelism. just make graphics look colorful and awesome, by having good artstyles. or go cell shading or 2D sprites.

Maybe.

>Bandai picked up the FOX Engine creator,
I hope it's really for games though

and? photorealism does not anything. because of you - suckers - we cant have good games with nice story and gameplay... only graphics and marketing.

I think not.

Fox engine renders 4 way shadows in pes at night under stadium lights. I dont see photorealism anytime soon from it

who is he?

consoles cant even do 60 fps properly for fuck sake

No, even in movies we are years away from photo-realism.

no one wants photo realism in games apart from the marketing fucks. Anyway luckily thats still decades away.

>This isn't real

You don't promote paedophilia, it's like promoting being gay.

jesus you are a fucking retard.

...

Or so you think.

who said anything about consoles
we're getting close to photo realistic vidya on pc but it needs top of line hardware which isn't isn't a good strategy especially for a game

Why would I want photorealism in the first place?
anime > 3DPD

my waifu on the left

Considering how powerful their existing graphics engines are, they plan on improving, while also creating new engines.

That said, they are the EA of Japan. So don't expect much.

i don't think thats clipping, i think it's just the way the hair curves back down

who cares those "realistic" games don't interest normies anymore.

t. weeb

YEAH

...

ei vittu make :DDD eks sun pitäs olla jälki-istunnos :DDD

>using all those polygons on a gook
Waste of time desu.

I still say that DMC4 (even though it's engine is completely unique in how it magically works flawlessly on toasters) is about the level of visual fidelity needed for 99% of games.

Would you kindly give names or codes

youtu.be/iP8EgMUVmwk

No it wouldn't you stupid fuck, do some research

>wanting 3dpd in games
Fuck your god damn immersion.

>An experience like you've never had before.
And probably never will.

I have no idea. Sorry.
Here, have another sauceless lewd.

>Can make any girl you'd want
>Make an above average looking gook teenager

>Sauceless

Do you know how easy it is to search "Rise cosplay" ?

Yes, but I don't want to.
Now let's just let this thread die.

Where are the JAV guys when you need them

No, even your pic is just uncanny valley and not photorealism and games have a LONG way to go to even reach uncanny valley.

I thought the girl in the OP was just a random teen using a camera filter, its not uncanny valley you would probably had thought the same if you didn't read the text first.

No m8, you might want to get your eyes checked.

who is this girl and why is she always giving this look?

Man I cummed buckets to his cute dick.

just go all out alreadu

Don't bother, "uncanny valley" is pretty much a buzzword nowadays.
The term itself is already something deeply entrenched in pseudoscience but now it has lost all meaning.

My god.

>lost all meaning
Yeah nah you are a faggot.

That isn't what uncanny valley means...

A meme.

>he

What?

>And probably never will.

Never understood this meme, is it so hard to pay someone to take your virginity?

In games, it's a waste of manpower, money, and precious processing power. And it's still more than a decade off at least.

For movies, CG, FMVs, etc? We're close. We're at the point where we can create images of objects(discounting living things, due to the valley) indiscernible from real life.

/p/ here, the answer is no

Only if by photorealism you mean "if you were to handpick a single static frame where there's not many things happening most people wouldn't be able to discern it from a real world picture taken by a shitty cellphone camera"

>NEETs having money

/thread

Narumi Lain?

God, I love Tron

It's a shame that we never get the third one

Came in here to post this.

Yes

Get fucked
youtube.com/watch?v=s6nMz2x4vs4

>NEETs having the willpower to pursue even a shadow basic human fulfillment

...

What's wrong with wanting good looking visuals?

Animation doesn't matter for photorealism. Your brain will just say, "this is a real person who moves unusually". Watch this if you don't believe me: youtube.com/watch?v=0ZZquVylLEo

GTA V's animations + accurate lighting and far better modeling would result in photorealism, period. We'll be there within 4 years for static environments, 8 for anything dynamic (you'll need ray tracing for that). If you doubt my timeline just google "unreal 4 archviz", that's where we'll be graphically when PS4 Pro and Scorpio start allowing exclusive titles.

>achieving protorealism

Old fag here, this conversation has been going on since the first 3D models were used when gaming when I was a kid. The issue is that the bar just keeps being set higher and higher because the human brain is good at picking out subtle patterns and differences.

When X-2 came out the opening cut-scene was "indistinguishable" to me and my friends even though in retrospect its obvious. youtube.com/watch?v=_fAw8KcGjMg

Everyone who has ever done that has regretted it.

It is though......................................................

You pay for sex regardless. Even when married. The difference is that when you're married you are usually not allowed to pick.

>married
Everyone who has ever done that has regretted it.

This, I have seen many virgin anons come and go and they all regret paying for their first time.

Marxist drivel meant to make yourself feel better for being a hollow cuck. Sex is about a connection to the person, especially your first time. False analogies like that make no more sense than calling your parents child slave-owners.