Halo 3 > Halo Reach > Halo 3 ODST > Halo 5 > Halo 2 > Halo CE > Halo Wars > Halo 4

Halo 3 > Halo Reach > Halo 3 ODST > Halo 5 > Halo 2 > Halo CE > Halo Wars > Halo 4

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/2ai4mGoTqVA
youtube.com/watch?v=6qfx9eoB-88
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Halo

The other COD

>Halo: Reach

halo 2 > the other bungie halos > 343 halos

>Reach that high

You fucked it up with that pal

3 > 2 > 1 > reach > who gives a shit after that

Talking strictly multiplayer/non-campaign:

Halo 3 > Halo 2 > Halo Reach > Halo CE > everything else is non-Bungie trash.

Reach is that good though.

>We'll never get another ODST game

>halo: reach above 2 and CE

hahahahahaha

Halo 3 > Halo 2 > Halo CE > Halo ODST > Halo Reach

The rest do not count.

Halo Reach>Halo>Halo2>Halo ODST>Halo 3>Halo Wars>Shit>Halo 4>Halo 5

>Halo 5
>that fucking high

The multiplayer was an improvement over 4, but holy God in heaven that story was atrocious

Halo 5 is pretty good on pc, and you can literally disable everything that makes it halo 5, as well as it has almost? Every gun from halo 2.

what's the best word in the world and why is it köksal?

>not liking Reach
Quit being a fag

>people play halo for the story

Worse than cod fags desu

Reach and halo 4 are the worst by far.

Multi-player speaking, it's 2, 3 and 5. Ce is tolerable but still shit desu, in 2001 everyone was playing quake and other good games anyways.

>we'll never get another odst game where you aren't just a spartan in a different setting
Man I wanted to feel scared while playing ODST but there's no difference between them and Chief.

>implying Bungie Halo games didn't have a good story

>halo 5 and Reach being better than halo 2 and 1
>halo 5 being better than anything

>implying anyone but super fags gave a shit. All the real players (ie, normies and dude bros) played multiple, the campaign is what set the autists apart at school.

Halo is pretty much unparalleled in terms of FPS campaign quality though.

>not having Halo 2 above ODST and 5

retarded, here's it supposed to be

Halo 3 > Halo Reach > Halo 2 > Halo 3 ODST > Halo 5 > Halo CE > Halo Wars > shit > Halo 4

>implying bungie halo games had a good story

hehehe

>all the real players

I'm sure you're a REAL gamer, huh?

3 >2>1>odst >>Reach>>wars>>>>>>>>>>>5

Anything else is wrong

>Halo 2
>one hit kill sniper jackals on legendary
>better than anything but halo 4

Uhm... no

>Bungie

If you, for a second believe 343 have "crafted" a better story, it's time to lobotomise yourself because it won't make much of a difference either way. 343 took everything that made Halo unique and turned it into another generic space action SJW shooter with the player having absolutely no emotional attachment to the characters anymore.

Half Life and perfect dark shit all over Halo

>projecting this hard

Halofags everybody

Halo Reach is way too high, otherwise i agree.

You need to play more FPSs. Then you'll realise Halo's campaigns are barely better than CoDs'.

This is my opinion exactly, halo 1-3 were great, I had so many memories Lanning with those games, and the story was good too, then 343 went and fucked it all up, I don't care for the new characters nor master chief anymore even for the 10 min you get to play him in Halo 5. I still have a shrine for the past games though

The problem is the weapons. An ODST uses the same rifle exploring the city as the Master Chief did fighting off hordes of Flood. It's hard to make a Brute scary when you've played two other games slaughtering hundreds of them when you have the same arsenal as the Chief and Arbiter. At least your commanding officer in game acknowledges that it's impressive that you're still alive after traversing the city at night.

Checks out. Halo 4 shouldn't even be mentioned.

Oh yeah forgot to mention Halo reach, I like it the best of all campaign wise and below H2 and H3 multiplayer wise. I have memoribilia for that game too.

...

At least you niggers do agree Halo 3 is best Halo.

What I feel is special about Bungie's Halo campaigns as opposed to other games is how good they are about getting so much across in so little time. I learned more about the Covenant in the first Arbiter cutscene where he's put on trial the I did aboth the Promethean's in two games of 343's Halo.

Rech is actually that good, also th best main campaign.

Pic related for OP, as per usual.

Campaign for the ones worth playing:

1 > ODST > 3 > 2

Multiplayer for ones worth playing:

1 > 2 > 3

Any sad sack who doesn't put 1 first is too young to have experienced the glory of CE PC and you should pity them.

That's because Bungie uses simple real life associations, which we are all aware of, to establish a world, ie theocracy for the covenant.

ODST and no Reach

post discarded

>halo 1 campaign best
>library
>backtracking through half the game
>the same rooms repeated ad infinitum

Thanks for the laugh, nostalgiafag.

>Underage "omg fighting to the death so ebin"

Opinion on my post discarded.

HALO CE> 3> ...

>plasma pistol and pistol: the videogame
>better than any but 4 and 5
>press y and let aim assist work its magic: the mp
>better than any but 4
3>2>Reach>5>ODST>CE>4

>backtracking through well designed levels with completely different enemy layouts and strategies is bad
>campaigns with levels that very heavily lean on levels from the first game (the library included) is good

Replay the campaign. Same rooms ad infinitum is about as uninformed of an opinion about Halo CE campaign as you can have. It's not applicable in the slightest. Or get better taste.

>halo

where the fuck are all these halo thread coming from? is there a new halo game coming out or some shit?

>aim assist on CE
>battle rifle: the video game is good
>being too much of an underage sad sack to experience CE PC

Pity: the post.

>Replay the campaign.

I did. The criticisms apply. You should replay the game too. Don't think that'll make a difference though for a nostalgiafag for whom Halo was his first FPS.

No but it (was) one of the best Sci fi fps, one of the best Xbox games and one of the best modern party games.

If you replayed it you'd know that same rooms is as unvalid a criticism for CE as it is for any other game. Stop outing yourself.

>le underage
i've played all of the halo games on release day except for 1 and TMCC, 1's multi is just switch to pistol and wreck shit

>covenant ship
>the same purple hallways and hanger repeated constantly
>ice level
>the same bridge and room are repeated constantly

Every level consists of the same rooms repeated constantly. I don't even have to mention the library, do I?

The amount of faggots on this board who love Reach confirms that there are way too many underage here.

>Campaign List (By story)

2 > 1 > ODST > 4 > 3 > Reach > 5

inb4 MUH 3 campaign! it was filled with plotholes. 4's story was solid

>Campaign Gameplay (level design, etc)
1 > 3 > 2 > ODST > Others (all others too close to call/ equal)

>Multiplayer
5 > 2 > 3 > 1 > Reach > 4

5 has the best multiplayer right now. I have many great memories with 3, but 2 and 5 have truly innovated with custom games and how it plays.

>Forge

This one is obvious.

5 > Reach > 4 > 3


Point is Reach is a piece of shit and any one that says is the best played that game first

>reach above anything other than death

i'm still mad

>4
>that high

you're even worse than underage

>I just replayed the campaign
>can't name the levels

youtu.be/2ai4mGoTqVA

I implore you to show me where there are repeating rooms. I'll lurk so take your sweet little time. You're welcome to post a walkthrough of those other levels you "recently played" to prove your point as well. You won't find anything so it's all the same.

>pistol ruins muh games
>muh battle rifle

Every fucking thread. How many in this thread honestly knew the pistol was nerfed on CE PC?

Confirmed for not knowing shit

4 actually had good characters, the Cortana/ Chief dyanmic was fresh. Didact was a cool villain. Requiem was sweet.

The scene with Captain Lasky and Chief on the bridge, or when Chief tells Del Rio "No Sir" are great moments.

Prometheans sucked, level design sucked, Palmer sucks, and the Spartan IVs suck.

I'm a lorefag though so I am a bit biased. If you don't keep up with the lore it isn't as great

This is objective truth:

Halo 3 > Halo 2 > Halo CE > Halo Reach > Halo Wars > Halo 3: ODST > Halo 4 > Halo 5

343 Halo is trash and fanfiction at that.

How many in this thread even played the most obscure version of the game? I dunno user.
Besides, the BR is not as overpowered as the pistol, not by a long shot.

Online Match-Making
5>2>3>4>1>Reach

Campaign
2>1>3>4>Reach>5

This is also correct

Did you even watch the video? Literally the same hallway and hangar are constantly repeated.

Did you? I linked so you provide timecodes of your evidence. Are you going to keep dancing around this?

Inb4 "you didn't watch the video and want me to watch it for you." You made the shitty argument so provide the evidence, faggot.

CE > Reach > 3 > 2 > HW >>>>>>>>>>POWERGAP>>>>>>>>>>> ODST > 4 > 5

This is objectively correct.

>longer effective range
>ability to drop shields quicker
>halo 2 hitboxes

Sure, user.

Reach that high in forge. Majority of launch maps were forge maps or maps in the campaign. The only thing Reach did was add new items to forge but did a piss job of it. I'd say forge let Bungie get so lazy that it's the reason REach is objectively the worse Halo game.

Reach only gets to be above 5 overall because 5's campaign is deplorable.

>4
fuck off faggit.

This.

And lol ppl hating on Reach Campaign,

c'mon dude, I love CE and all but to outright deny that the majority of the game isn't just move from corridor to corridor killing the same four or five enemy types is delusional

351836474
not even gonna bother with that (You)

>haven't played a halo game since reach
>Was at friend's house and tried halo 5

I got raped so hard in the multiplayer. Holy fuck. Did I get old and shitty or had the game mechanics changed that much since I played?

What is so great about Reach's campaign? Le epic final hope? The best part of it was >Objective: Survive

We were shown cutscenes of giant battles between Humanity and the Covenant, but got more corridor fighting. Not to mention Noble Team has the personality of a bunch of cardboard cutouts.

I put it higher than 3 because technically it did add more than 3 and expanded on more tools (merging, snapping, etc)

But people seem to forgot that half of Reach's launch maps are forged, and the other half are COPYPASTE from campaign levels

Ebin

>wow this game is just push a button to do things

And the dance continues.

>corridor fighting.
>reach

Reach has arguably the least amount of corridors of the series.

I agree and i say it as someone who doesn't like Reach's campaign.

>Confirmed for not knowing shit

>4 actually had good characters, the Cortana/ Chief dyanmic was fresh. Didact was a cool villain. Requiem was sweet.

Cortana and chief dynamic was soooo forced in 4, and was a failure of a "romance/love" arc. Halos 2-3 expressed master chief and Cortanas relationship much more subtly, effectively and it felt more natural. Chief reluctantly leaving Cortana on high charity, looking at the empty chip in 3, being haunted by her in his mind, and spending all of 3 trying to get her back is far better story telling compared to the obvious fan service, awjward shift in relationship and tone, and needless drama in 4.

The characters were just shitty plot fillers and drama instigators in a game series that never needed drama or bullshit.

Plus, chief went from being the quiet, super lucky, yet highly skilled soldier to a prophetic "chosen one" super human with millions of years of the forerunners' planning and evolution behind him?

The Didact was a shitty villian, who had a half assed reason to do what he did. And seriously, super powers? In halo? Not to mention this "all powerful villian" dies in a 3 second cut scene

>The scene with Captain Lasky and Chief on the bridge, or when Chief tells Del Rio "No Sir" are great moments.
No, it's more needless TV drama in a game that never needed it.

>Prometheans sucked, level design sucked, Palmer sucks, and the Spartan IVs suck.
Agreed

>I'm a lorefag though so I am a bit biased. If you don't keep up with the lore it isn't as great
That explains it. Halos lore was perfectly fine before 343 got a hold of it, then it turned into a fan fiction esque story with corny dialogue and characters trying to crudely inject extra drama and story arcs into it.

>Reach better than anything

Why do so many people hate Halo Reach? Is it because Reach retcons the terrible Halo comics?

Reach's campaign is garbage because it had shit marketing. Bungie emphasized Carter a lot in the game's marketing and how you'd be part of a band of brothers group of soldiers fighting their final fight on this battle that we'd know to be lost. People had high expectations for bigger battles compared to previous Halo games that had an engaging story that made you feel or these characters that you knew would most likely never leave the surface of the planet. Firstly Carter was the worse character to use for their marketing since you have 0 missions with him and then he dies a death that feels completely unnecessary as if the guy who wrote it in just saw Independence Day for the first time. The fact that your team is picked off one by one in cutscenes that happened anticlimactically didn't give people any emotional investments to them except for the girl and maybe Jorge a little. another thing they did wrong was talk about moa and the big monster things like animals would have a large presence in the game.

And for forge the way in which forge was expanded was really underwhelming. adding the new features was nice but they didn't offer a new experience with it. 5s forge is unbeatable because it became ever evolving. it wasn't just placing new items it became expansive with textures, fauna, effects, lighting, shadows, etc. Reach was just a tad better than 3 at best.

Bungie gave up with Reach and only made the game out of contractual obligations

>Halo PC not number 1
what is Halo Custom Edition

The games SP is one of the most fun. Fuck story and feeling "scared" fun is all it has to be and it succeeded unlike any halo afterwards

See

Halo 2> Halo 3> halo CE> Reach> halo 5>halo 4

>CE only tolerable
Who gave you that shitty opinion? CE worse than 5 in terms of multiplayer? Fuck off

>Reach's campaign is garbage because it had shit marketing.

How can you even compare the FPS Halo games with Halo Wars?

CE>3>ODST=Reach>Halo Wars>2

I have no desire to play 343 Cortana soap opera shit and I will not rate them.

Halo Wars 2 might bring me some enjoyment because I really like the first game.

Emile>Johnson>Miranda>Chief

Shame they couldn't get Eric Nylund involved to work on Halo 4's story

yeah, look at No man's sky and tell me that the hype and expectations failed in what they actually gave. same applies for Reach.

Halo 5 (Custom Games and Forge) was released on PC for free. Been playing nothing but that and having a ton of fun with it, I didn't even think I'd enjoy Forge now that it's just an actual level editor designed for one person, but I spent 3 comfy hours trying to perfect a Hang 'em High remake.

So long as they keep the old designs and don't bring any of 343's garbage "modern" design or story. I'm going to be fucking pissed if the Infinity shows up or some shit like that. Also, when the fuck are they going to port the first game to PC?

I'm sorry but I can't take this seriously with all the zoomed words

Halo 4 was still shit

Reach felt like more of a tech test for the abilities that were going to be in Destiny. I liked the story and all, but I'm willing to bet Destiny was past planning and already in development soon after Reach launched. Shame Activision butchered the story for more at the very least tow more paid expansions than needed.

youtube.com/watch?v=6qfx9eoB-88