Specs are out
Specs are out
Other urls found in this thread:
blogs.nvidia.com
gamespot.com
vg247.com
youtube.com
theverge.com
vg247.com
youtu.be
extremetech.com
twitter.com
How do these compare to the Wii U?
switch performs 1.5 teraflops docked 1.0 mobile
wii u performed 1 gigaflop
>source: my wife's son's ass
This is obviously bullshit.
Someone's about to go to jail
First of all OP its 1.5 teraflops of half precision which works out to an actual value of 0.75 teraflops. Compared to the PS4 which has 1.84 teraflops this thing gonna blow
Source Nvidia's own website:
blogs.nvidia.com
>rumor
Fuck off.
>roughly the power of an Xbox One crammed into a device roughly the size of a DVD case, along with the components required for a screen, plus a battery
calling bullshit
Not saying its true, but who knows? We could have advanced far enough to make it.
except for missed one crucial bit
The Wii U, PS4 and Xbone take the same time to do FP16 as FP32 so they don't get twice the speed by doing half precision
the next generation GPUs batch process and can do twice as many FP16 as FP32
so for every shader that uses half precision, the 1.5 tflops on switch compares to 1.84 on PS4
its only when you look at the PS4P you can double it for that comparison
have you missed the modern development of phone chips?
It's been 3 years user, not 300 years.
the shield is 3 years old too
the tech already existed to put an xboner on a handheld, its just a question of whether nintendo would spring for the extra cost or go on the cheap
>it's another "leaker" just copy pasting the base X2 specs without any clue what theyre fucking talking about
Why do you all own such ugly looking cats?
It is but lets say the rummor is right and it has a pascal based tegra ship that has 1.5 tflops of FP16
see that means its less powerfull then a gtx 280 which came out more then 8 years ago
Which also supports FP16
Fluffy kitty
The Nvidia Shield is nowhere near as strong as an Xbone.
They got an iPad to run battlefield 4 about two years ago
gamespot.com
Sure it won't be as powerful as a PS4 pro, but if that is anything to go by then the switch should have no problem running modern games if a two year old ipad can do it
and according to those leaked specs neither is the switch
Blah blah blah insert barneyfag here
Stocking isn't in mlp tho.
Why would barneyfag want anything to do with PSG
nvidia is much more power efficient than AMD... 7850(which xbox and ps4 chip is based on) is like 5 generations behind pascal, meaning the power efficiency will be out of the for the switch gpu/cpu compared to ps4/xbone.
>DirectX 12
It's fake
Why? Even nvidia says it supports dx12. That guy just copied the specs directly from nvidia's website
Why though?
>Not recognizing nipponese slideshows
It's thicker than a DVD case, and remember, it doesn't have a disc drive, allowing it to be much smaller. Moreover, it has vents on it. Switch could, in other words, perform as a mid-lower high range LAPTOP.
Blini
if nvidia actually decided to produce decent gpu/cpu core then i see no problem it outperforming xbone, which uses crippled amd laptop cpu, with crippled 7850 gpu, any pascal core + most powerful arm cpu core combination should be able to outperform xbone.
this is obviously bullshit. the only thing we know that was confirmed by nvidia on release date is that its using a custom tegra chip. we dont know if its x1 or x2, but its a tegra, not a pascal. fucking hell if you're going to fake a leak atleast make it plausible.
>talk to sonygger fag at work about Switch
>"It's another gimmick, I won't get it"
What the fuck. It has an option to take it with oyu. That's the only gimmick, and it is non-intrusive. When will these faggots be happy? I bet if they made a normal console they'd complain it doesn't do anything exciting
The GPU is pascal-like you nigger. It even says so on Nvisias website
are you fucking retarded, pascal is the arficheture, while tegra is the family of product. as in Pascal architecture GTX video card family or pascal architecture TEGRA family
>Rumor
I'll believe it when Nintendo puts out the specs themselves.
i can't say I blame him. If the switch really can handle current gen games Nintendo is going to need to prove it before people see it as anything other than a gimmick.
The fuck is a teraflop and why do we suddenly care?
Shut up fags I don't need to educate myself Sony consoles have all the power anyone should actually be allowed to have.
basically 1060gtx is 4teraflop, while ps4 is 1.83teraflop, but ps4 teraflop is actually differnt then nvidia's one, as in 1.83fp from ps4 would be 1.5 fp from nvidia. So if real switch is targeting ps4 level of graphics performance.
Meowmins
in 16 bit compression
ps4 pro does 8.4 Tflops in 16 bit compression.
Possible.
But its not happening because ARM.
I wonder if Switch will attract phone devs into it.
You cant do shit with half presition compute unless you are playing 2d games in 4k
Oh yeah? My console could beat up your console
EXACTLY
That is why the switch with 1.5 teraflops of half precision will perform like shit compared to the xbox one
WHO CARES, ITS A
R U M O R
U
M
O
R
You realize that the PS4 and Xbone were running on 2-3 year old garbage tech when they were first released, right? And that was 3 years ago.
They're basically an entire console generation behind, dude. And mobile chips have been getting a LOT of R&D.
>First of all OP its 1.5 teraflops of half precision which works out to an actual value of 0.75 teraflops
that's not how it works at all. a flop is literally only applicable to full floats. if you use half floats you aren't counting in flops and there's no direct conversion possible because your whole system is impacted by this shit.
Tech evolves, a calculator used to take a whole room up.
gomenasai, emily rogers
The performance won't suffer too much given that Nintendo doesn't release too many hardware intensive games. The third party studios will have to manage the content more, it looks like.
So its a ps vita with 720p, 0.7 teraflops, 6 inches screen AND Nintendo/capcom games?
Sign me fucking in!
Anyone not hyped for a beefed up Monster hunter portable machine should be hanged.
A full on Desktop GTX 1080 can fit in a moderate sized laptop thanks to Pascal.
That's over 6tflops.
1.5 tflops in a tablet sounds feasible to me.
BLAST
PROCESSING!!!!
This doesn't really matter if the battery life is terrible.
If you don't understand just say it's a meme like everyone else.
It's also great because the console itself is designed to be enjoyed on HDTV's while Sony and Xbone are going for UHD setups. So it won't really cut into the hone entertainment field at all, no glaring problem like jaggies or lack of SSAO at that range.
>hyper drive toaster blu ray mgp warp over drive GNU kernel GNOME drivers 1080p intel phenom techron deisel windows vista OSX RAM psu usb hdmi coaxil output motherboard hd radean 6670 fermi GTK3 sd card cairo java interface thunderbolt E3 toaster model 12 hd quickscore pinecone dot matrix lcd blast processing XxX420XxX nintendont 16 bit million of colors ROM loading optial media cario desktop compositing buzzword AMD cores cores cores CORES cloud computing 3 in one cartridge stop n swop hole technology pro MLG breaching claymore 3d game system graphics worth the weight george foreman heating technology uncharted america friendly dogshit polymer macroprocesor
Nintendo wins again!
>talk with someone who is normalfag as fuck
>he mentioned ps4p will be the most powerfull gaming device period, stomping pc's on the ground
>"Oh realy?"
>"Ya man, all these teraflops man shit is going to be crazy!"
>"Well what is a teraflop"
>"It makes the graphics dude!"
people who defend the ps4p dont even know why its supposed to be good.
Pascal is really good, it's not perfect when it comes to DX12 but in every other way it shines.
Also 1080p scales perfectly on 4K sets, so if you only have a 4K TV that's fine too.
With how cartoony most Nintendo games are, most Ninty games will be 1080p/60.
Do you even read the thing you linked?
They said it was a non functioning tech demo. Show me some real gameplay
>Nintendo doesn't release too many hardware intensive games
>what is legend of zelda breath of the framerate
What do you think it smells like haha I would just like to know haha
No point trying to argue with Nintendo fanboys.
>It even says so on Nvisias website
>Nvisias website
>Nvisias
Nude Vista? Did someone just have a slip up?
>4k 60fps
Lol so fake
Allow me then- it has the best cost to performance ratio of any gaming device currently on the market. Sure, you could build a PC that is stronger and can do 4k to compete- but at more than double the price!
PS4 Pro is an absolute steal for the level of image quality it is putting out. That is why it is good. Not because it "stomps PC".
PC will always be best, if you dump enough cash into it.
But for cost/performance ratio, I havent seen anything offering a better deal than the PS4 pro.
Breath of the wild isn't very hardware intensive. They even explained it over an interview, the demo ran at about 12% of the world map in total. The actual game is supposed to be huge and vast in scale, Skyward Sword and Wind Waker HD were 60 in any circumstance.
vg247.com
youtube.com
No console can beat up my original Xbox.
The thing is, most people on this board are ignoring all the 3DS and Vita exclusives over the years, pretending that all handheld developers are now going to just pack their bags and ignore the next handheld, just so Nintendo can die or something.
It's retarded. This shit is about to get every 3DS and Vita developer out there because it's the new handheld and it's the only one.
what about scorpio bro
Scorpio is 6 TFlops at 32bit and will be the exact same price most likely.
Its not even out yet, so we don't know what it can even do. The PS4 base was marketed as delivering 1080/60, while 1080/30 was closer to reality. I'm expecting the pro to bump the res up to around 1440p, assuming developers will patch their existing games for it. We all know that Sony's first party western devs will just cram marginal graphical effects and squeeze out 1080/30 in the end.
Allow me to restate the key point:
>gaming device currently on the market.
Scorpio is at least a year out, we dont know exact specifics on it nor do we know price point, but yes, it is possible that Scorpio could be a better deal.
But it is a meemee user
What about it? there's no new info about it and all M$ and their nut huggers keep going on about is "muh 6 TF". For all we know the PS4P and the Xb1Sco are using the same exact hardware, but at different clock speeds.
PS4P = RX 480 clocked @900Mhz = 4TF
Xb1Sco could = RX 480 clocked @1.305 = 6TF
The PS4 pro is not on the market.
Two cents have been deposited to your PS plus account.
I don't care I just want to know what the battery life is
But why should I buy the PS4 Pro when something so much stronger is coming out in a years' time? It's not like the Pro is getting any exclusives. 50m+ people already own a PS4, they don't NEED a replacement, they can already play all of the games.
What's good about the Pro? If for some reason you haven't picked up a PS4 yet, you can have a high-power low-cost gaming machine for one year before the next big thing comes along and utterly wrecks its shit?
the only problem is that the ps4 pro had its internals confirmed my the designer himself
>“We doubled the GPU size by essentially placing it next to a mirrored version of itself, sort of like the wings of a butterfly,” he explained.
Its just 2 PS4s in crossfire
theverge.com
It would have less tflops if that was the case, even a perfect mirroring would only yield 3.6tflops
didnt they add faster ram or something, remember reading that.
>rumor
>being this fucking stupid
>STILL
you do realize those were edited in right?
>Rumour
So, pony thread?
They have 8GB of GDDR5+1GB of DDR3 or 4 in the Pro.
That doesn't make any sense. I'm sure it wouldn't be able to yield that much of power increase and how the hell would they include things from Polaris and Vega?Could have sworn that the said it's a new chip based on Polaris and has a few things from Vega that will be making their first appearances in the wild on the Pro.
you do know that the ps4 gpu is under clocked right.
>The core clock frequency has been lowered from 1GHz to 860MHz which has reduced the compute performance from 2.56 TFLOPS to 1.75 TFLOPS, a 32% reduction.
I have the same exact gpu in the ps4 yet I can still run games better on it.
I'm sure that with a better binned version at a higher overclock then mine can achieve 4.2 teraflops. Heck two stock 7850 in crossfire can theoretically output 5+ teraflops with perfect scaling
The problem is perfect GPU is scaling is a myth for now, for gaming anyway.
>zeldainformer
My AMD 7850, which is the GPU used in the PS4 already out performs it since it isn't underclocked .
With two of them you don't even need perfect scaling to achieve 4.2 teraflops
My grandpas dad works for nintendo and he says the switch has 4 titans in the handles
No, the PSU uses an underclcoked 7970 based APU.
It has around 7850 tier performance as is, yes.
At best they could hope for maybe 75% scaling when going dual GPU.
>But why should I buy the PS4 Pro when something so much stronger is coming out in a years' time?
Exactly the argument you should use when asking why you should ever buy a gaming PC. Why the FUCK would anyone invest 1500$ into a gaming PC when its just gonna have an upgrade every year or two.
7970m*
Sorry about that.
I did find Gran Turismo running on the Nintendo SWITCH.
youtu.be
From what I understand.. That is not the case.
It's some kind of new single chip with old parts and new parts in one. That's how they're able to include AMD's newest and old developments in the Pro.
>let me just use a rumor at face value for ridiculing something and hope that I don't inherently look idiotic in the process.
But you do.
1- it isn't portable
2- it doesnt have any exclusive games. all it's extra power will be used to get games that already can be played at 1080 up to 4k, and nobody cares