Which one is better for killing times ?

Which one is better for killing times ?

A bullet to the brain

You can't kill time, you dumb motherfucker.

Witcher 3 is strictly better than Fallout 4

Call me crazy but I really didn't like either of them.

So Fallout 4 has bigger map than Witcher 3 ?

Fallout 4 was so shit tier, I had to go out and get another game to wash the bad taste out of my mouth. Went and bought Witcher 3, vastly more entertaining in my opinion.

Do you lads reckon Todd makes his games terrible on purpose, with the hope people will resort to purchasing other Bethesda games?

E.g. Damn, Fallout was poor. Can't wait till Dishonoured comes out.

Then the cycle continues.

HE CANT KEEP GETTING AWAY WITH IT

Well, on the left you have one of the worst RPGs ever made and on the right one of the best RPGs of the last few years by a landslide. Your choice really.

New Vegas

>Actually wanting to kill time.

You only got about 100 000 days to live you know?

Just kidding it's more like 20 000 days.

Do you want to shoot n loot or actually have dialogue and stories play in front of you?

I prefer shoot n loot this month.

Fallout has longer loading screens on average. So fallout

Fallout 4 for sure.

Retards will think I'm calling it the better game, but I'm not. It just sucks up more time.

New Vegas

>Well, on the left you have one of the worst RPGs ever made
Bethesda makes RPGs? I thought they are into shooters?

underrated post

no?

Witcher 3 takes a huge dump on not only Fallout 4, the whole Fallout franchise. It is miles ahead of any Fallout game. There is pretty much nothing what Fallout series does better than Witcher 3 aside from giving you a custom character.

fallout 4 has more fun gameplay and combat
witcher has better story and quests
but i wouldn't recommend playing witcher 3 before trying out witcher and 2 beforehand.

Probably fallout, though I never touched 4.

But Witcher is good at quests and (ironically) any time the game behaves linearly, just wandering around the world is usually pretty boring.

Combat is shit in Fallout 4 but it's worse in Witcher.

um... combat

If you play the witcher you'll have to pay attention because of all the characters and dialogue, otherwise you'll get confused.. But fallout you can just play and get on with it because of the simple narrative.

Witcher 3.

If you want to play a post-apocalyptic survival game go with New Vegas and install a bunch of mods.

Fallout is for gameplay
Witcher is for story

Nah for a shooter, combat is garbage in Fallout. Fallout 4 improved it a bit, but it's still garbage compared to any decent shooter.

Meanwhile Witcher 3 has great combat for a western-rpg. I can't think of a western game that did melee-combat better than Witcher 3

You should play the Skyrim Special Edition! It's like Fallout 4, with swords!

>fallout 4 has more fun gameplay and combat
The game barely has enough to be called an RPG

What gameplay is there in Fallout? Dealng with constant bugs, glitches, terrain clipping, clunky shooting, enemies teleporting, health-sponge enemies?

M&B has the best combat in wrpg

The gunplay and combat feels nice whereas witcher 3 is some weird and unresponsive shit.

divinity original sins
dark messiah
m&b

>Witcherfags saying that the combat is great again

Fallout 4. I'm getting tired of mideval settings.