Can Breath of the Wild surpass Witcher 3 as the best Open World game?

Can Breath of the Wild surpass Witcher 3 as the best Open World game?

If not, can it at least come close to?

Depends on who Sup Forums wants to bombard with shitposting the most, Nintendo fanboys or Witcher 3 fanboys.

Probably not. Especially from what we've seen so far

Maybe in terms of combat but that's it

lmao no

Probably. Especially from what we've seen so far.

everyone will go ape shit over it even though it will be nothing but and big empty physics engine demo

depends if it caters to nu male cucks or not

right looks fun from what they have shown, the left is a Assassin's creed but less fun and lot more boring.

It will have better gameplay and graphics which is all that matters.

How can anyone even compare Witcher to AC?

Witcher is mature and gritty for adults, AC is PG13 for the mass market.

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Witcher III is not the best open world game and Zelda is unlikely to be either.

And there's not even any reason to compare them.

Well, Weebs and nuMales will love it because it's from Japan and it's Zelda, so it'll beat Witcher in terms of popularity either. Whether it's better or not, I doubt it. There hasn't been a single good Zelda game where Adult Link is the main character, desu. (OOT doesn't count)

Neither are even close to best open world game.

>Better Graphics
I will give you the gameplay but only if Zelda actually goes full dark souls rip off with its combat otherwise it will be garbage.

Both games are designed from the ground up for nu males and casuals.

>everything has to be Dark Souls

You've had the same game five times now plus at least two clones with decent budgets, why would you want another?

same could be said about zelda

Because its combat is the best, hands down. No need in making something different when someone already perfect it.

In my eyes dark souls already surpassed zelda. Its basically zelda for grown ups and zero hand holding

>Because its combat is the best

It's less about it's combat and more about it's weapon selection and enemy design, neither of which Zelda has at the moment.

You mean Bloodborne combat, surely.

Witcher 3 isn't the game to beat as far as good open world games go.

Have you played the Witcher 3? Especially on the computer with mods?

>Witcher III
>best anything
At least I had good taste when I posted here as an underage.

Underrated

Witcher 3 was overhyped garbage, litterally shilled all over this fucking board back when it released

People talk about games they like, wow, what a shill!

What's supposed to be good about Witcher III? It doesn't even take advantage of the world or provide reason for it to be an open world game, even Skyrim has more depth when it comes to the world itself.

The story is largely uninteresting. It gives you no reason to care about the characters and uses them as the driving force to get you to trudge from point A to point B.

It's a glorified minimap. When riding in your horse you aren't even exploring, you have your eyes glued to the minimap and the navigation points. Maybe if you actually had to explore it would be like, you know, a game.

The movement is an atrocity. If the game isn't fun to control on a basic movement level, there's just no real reason to continue. Combat is clunky and unintuitive.

Gwent is heftily overrated and easy to exploit. It's not a well balanced game, and offers no real significant challenge once you wrap your head around the absolute basics.

Side quests offer nothing other than the claim that there are side quests.

Really, the visuals are spectacular, but that's not why I play games. The question shouldn't be comparing Breath of the Wild -- a physics based exploration survival dungeoun crawling game. The Witcher is a set-piece story driven western RPG. The games look sound and play nothing alike.

It's not that hard to surpass Wild Blunt, at least in term of gameplay and fun.

No, Zelda's never been good, Nintendo is trash at making games.

Are you implying your pic related isn't fucken horrible.

Fuckin fallout 3 has a better open world than witcher 3.

>3

maybe 4, but not 3

BoTW will have better combat and locations, but not have Witcher 3's characters and questlines.

BoTW will be good in it's own ways,just like Witcher 3. Both can take solace in being better than anything Bethesda's shat out since Oblivion.

This guy is one of few non-shitposters in this thread

Gameplaywise I think I'd rather play BotW and I'm expecting it to be a boring barren game, but I think the sandbox nature of it will be mildly entertaining for about an hour like GTA. Witchers combat is just really dull, but that's not really those games strong points.

I love dark souls, but it's already getting old for me. I think building off of dark souls would be a good start though

The real question is can anything surpass Witcher 3 as the best Open World game, and the answer is no, TW3 is perfect so you might as well give up on future open world games now cause it can not and will not get better than this

Anything can surpass the Witcher 3
Graphics downgrades
DLC when they said no DLC
Controls that blow

gta5 already surpassed wither 3, in fact every 3d GTA game is a better open world game than witcher 3

What's the best open world game?
>inb4 trick question; they're all shit

No, and it's laughable to suggest such a thing. There's more to making an open world game than a giant map with pretty set pieces.

Can Witcher III surpass Fallout New Vegas as the best Open World game?

If not, can it at least come close to?

I can't play Breath of the Wild on anything I own, so it sucks

>GTA games
>good open world

Better sandbox perhaps, but the open world design is a chore in GTA games. Sure the scenery is nice but it's just backdrop to go from point A to point B like all rockstar games.