PSVR enthusiasts ***LITERALLY*** on suicide watch

PSVR enthusiasts ***LITERALLY*** on suicide watch.

youtube.com/watch?v=7mHQ58voy_Y

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=djyuNpLWtXQ
change.org/p/eurogamer-es-delete-digital-foundry-at-eurogamer-es
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

>Digital Foundry

PS2 games unironically looked better than this.

>Sonyggers hating on DF despite them usually defending PS4's shit tier hardware

really makes you think doesn't it

...

>implying your attention shouldn't be towards the road
DELET DIS

I mean, you have to understand that VR means they have to run at 90fps and process two screens at the same time.
The cost of that is graphical quality.

PSVR is 60FPS, 2x 1280x720

and Driveclub runs at 30fps in 1x 1080p.
They need to reduce graphics to get a smooth framerate.
What i'm wondering is whether Pro increased quality.
youtube.com/watch?v=djyuNpLWtXQ

it still looks like trash

Pro does not increase graphics

It takes a $1000 VR to actually look really good. Why would you think a much lower budget one would look good at all?

>PS VR
>PS4 Pro
Two forced memes in one.

kys nigger

developers can do whatever the fuck they want with additional performance

change.org/p/eurogamer-es-delete-digital-foundry-at-eurogamer-es

Report to Sony and sign

Didnt the journalist said there was little to no difference? And that it was practically the same and in some cases even better?

This was supposed how VR should be done. This was the poster boy for VR optimization

I've been playing on my PSVR all day and love it, but Driveclub is hot fucking garbage and not worth your time. Buy an Xbox or a super powerful PC and buy Forza.

Seriously if anyone actually tells you Driveclub is a good game laugh in their face.

>Pro does not increase graphics

is that VR

THIS IS INSANE!!!
Why? Why would anyone pay for that?

Honestly the first thing I noticed was how fucking jaggy and blurry everything seemed on the VR.

I'm glad my friend bought it and I didn't fall for the meme.