Help

Help

6. Even if he picks one of each model, he still needs the 6'th to complete any set.

6

It's C

I didn't know layton was this easy.

Help

How many crows are there? The pictures overlap.

Absolute certainly needs 13 socks, not 6.

Explain.

The Puzzle Agent games weren't above some Layton-level bullshit puzzles. I can't remember any off the top of my head, but I know there was at least one.

That fucking chair jigsaw puzzle that has 2 solutions but only 1 is accepted.

Just ignore my stupidity. I got confused by pairs vs single socks.

7 crows

6

...

I used photoshop for this one

You can put them together multiple ways.

There are millions of crows.

Correct

>play Puzzle Agent
>Am convinced that I know the solution to a very early puzzle involving the hotel room key
>REJECTED
>Quit game because I know it's wrong
>Find out later that they ended up having to patch the game because the puzzle was, in fact, wrong and I was right

Fuck Puzzle Agent. Even if the whole game is good and right now, I can't take it seriously. The creator is a retard.

What do you mean?
The solution was always 9.

Help

...

>he failed to pair his socks because he's a teenager
he's fucking blind you ignorant ass racist

Help

top red fish

The mother is blind.

>blind woman knitted 5 pairs of socks with owls playing fiddle on them
no

so the smallest fish eats its own kind? wouldn't it mean that literally any line could be the right one, as you can just add the difference in small fish?

That's what it says.

first of all it's not, Blind Lars Jorgsens mother is definitely Lars being blind; second that wouldn't make any sense either. if he's not blind then why is he having trouble pairing his socks.

can someone explain to me how this even makes sense? every fish has another fish in it, that fish has to have another fish in it +2 more steps for it to add up to 5 fish on one line. However, if every fish has another fish in it then there are literally endless amounts of fish on all lines

Right line

Bottom left, isn't it?
>tanfish (1) has eaten a tanfish (2)
>greenfish (3) has eaten a tanfish (4)
>greenfish (5) has eaten the key

Bottom right, I mean.

Has to be top left red or blue.

>can someone explain to me how this even makes sense?
Can always trust the forums to make me feel retarded

I don't even understand the conclusion in the first point. thanks for trying though.