What are you expecting, Sup Forums?

What are you expecting, Sup Forums?

Other urls found in this thread:

thisgengaming.com/2016/11/28/final-fantasy-xv-review-a-disappointing-experience-for-a-first-time-player-xbox-one/
gearnuke.com/final-fantasy-xv-review/
ign.com/articles/2016/11/28/final-fantasy-xv-review
twitter.com/NSFWRedditImage

Mainly 8, 8.5, 9/10 because it's FF not because it's actually up to those standards.

I am expecting a good but not excellent game, I also expect shit posting no matter how good it is.

I expect full Square-Enix money throwing.

Verendus shill basically confirmed the line is "Game of the Generation"

I expect Main Stream Sites to give it 9/10 - 10/10

an alright game at best that will be grossly over rated

Famitsu 40/40
Metacritic 79

8/10 paid reviews

7/10 not trying to be too harsh reviews

6/10 honest reviews

8/10 because it's high enough to make FFags not sperg out but low enough to be considered ''just ok'' by journalism standards

I expect a lot of reviews-in-progress as a lot of publications didn't get their review keys until a day ago.

Square-Enix know its a flop.

Game is mediocre early on, gets bad at Chapter 9, then goes to shit at Chapter 13.

Enjoy.

/thread

10/10 Pcucks will cry for days.

98 metascore

3/10 correct reviews

Reviews are already in, source: thisgengaming.com/2016/11/28/final-fantasy-xv-review-a-disappointing-experience-for-a-first-time-player-xbox-one/

Cliffnotes include pic related and the pro/con section at the end.

"+ The characters and dialogue
+ Being able to capture that adventure feel
+/- The combat is fun, but too forgiving even on the hardest setting
– The main quests can drag with the early driving sections
– Side content is mostly not worth the time
– Xbox One’s bad performance
Final Score: 7/10"

>20 minutes until Sup Forums gets BTFO and will never recover

I'm waiting for the actual relevant ones.

>I haven't played it
>but its 3/10
nah, 3/10s are literally bottom of the barrel tier, no amount of shitposting or wishful thinking can change this. The game has to be literally unplayable, not unplayable by Sup Forums standards, since you contrarian faggots are always being so hyperbolic.

Also Sup Forums is ALWAYS wrong

>– Xbox One’s bad performance

DONT HATE THE PLAYA
DONT HATE THE GAME

>"+ The characters and dialogue

even fanboys who praise the game shit on the dialogues and characters

>20 minutes until threads over threads over threads about this gook shit

>Also Sup Forums is ALWAYS wrong
No Man's Sky.

im expecting a mediocre at best game to get 9/9.5 on every single review site.

>main game is bad
>side content is bad
>7/10

Characters are fine, but not the dialogue.

actually good now.

Doesnt matter if the game came with fre blow jobs and cocaine Sup Forums would still hate it because its "mainstream"

>crying about Sup Forums again

gb2gamefaqs

everyone loved this game until Conan came along

gearnuke.com/final-fantasy-xv-review/

8.8

People have been skeptical since XIII Versus

>return to form

wat

not a single knowledgeable person has hyped the game since 2014

I still don't know what people were expecting

>Game is boring and everything looks the same

No shit, were you expecting every planet to be completely unique and interesting?

>lose its significance after one of the best selling FFs
>return to form

This review is too subjective.

True, but not one said it was shit till they hpped on the Conan bandwagon like cheep whores.

>wat

OH MY GOD SOMEONE IS THINKING OUT OF OUR HATE-FILLED HYPERBOLIC NARRATIVE

Full month of excessive shitposting no matter how shit or okay it turns out, e-celeb talking heads with differing opinions shit out nerd reductivist analysis that everyone will parrot, meme macros will emerge and be reposted

You know, the usual

oh shut the fuck up

everything after uncovered has been terrible and you know it

10s across the board with APOLOGIZE spam

I don't get it..

Did i cut to close to home you bandwaggoning faggot? Celeb says jump you say how high.

Fun exploration and optional hunting missions.
Shallow but entertaining combat, hurt by fucking QTEs.
Great music and beautiful art design.
Awful characters, plot and script.

A 6/10, but "press" scores always have +2 points, so it'll have about 85 in Metacritic.

>i-if it's for you, Tabata-dono, I...

here we go

>gets delayed

>she still hasn't been dicked by that big orc cock
JUST

10s incoming

t. industry insider

People will drag this game really hard until FFXVI comes out and then suddenly XV will have been one of the secret best games in the series that only true fans can appreciate

It's simply amazing how you're still asshurt over Conan.

PS4 is pretty much a Bloodborne playing machine. And soon to be a Nioh playing machine.

IGN 10/10
POLYGON 10/10
GIANTBOMB 10/10

FUCKING APOLOGIZE

T-THIS IS JUST TABATA'S LATEST MISUNDERSTOOD MASTERPIECE, JUST LIKE 3RD BIRTHDAY

WHY WON'T YOU BANDWAGONING FAGGOTS UNDERSTAND THAT!!?

8.2 from ign

An overrated game and reviewers saying the combat is good because WOW PARITCLE EFFECTS

It looks terrible and I have zero interest in it. Boy band with poor pacing, in empty areas doing repetitive monster slaying quests, and terrible combat.

Open world is garbage. Offline MMO's are garbage.

Wrong, faggot didn't even know till bandwaggon faggots like you spamed an opinion thats not your own. This is Sup Forums remember we hate e celebs/celebs here nevermind take their opinions as fact
>neo-Sup Forums

It's amazing that this game exists on the same planet as Ys VIII and soon Nier 2 but this will still sell the best out of the 3 of those

Makes you wish eugenics was a real thing

>eurogamer doesnt recommend it

el oh el

>+Great combat
>+Gorgeous music
>+Well realized world
>+Plenty to do
>+Fantastic graphics and beautifully animated
>-Sparse story
9.8/10 by IGN

...

>8.2 from IGN
How do you fuck up THAT badly

Okay we get it, you hate Sup Forums. Why are you even crying here?

85 on Metacritic.
"Improvement over XIII, but not on level of past games in series, nor up to standard of other open-world games."

>Half the game is linear

was 10 years not enough?

Pretty accurate. Hell, the .2 knockoff is pretty an on point personation

Considering that the shitty MGSV got perfect 10's and 9's across the board I expect that an at least complete game gets a 11/10

>nor up to standard of other open-world games."

So it's below average but it's 85

Final Fantasy 15's own opening text describes it as "a Final Fantasy for fans and newcomers alike." The game contains pieces sure to disappoint players in both camps, but it also provides a refreshingly human take on the classic RPG journey that I hope will inspire future games in the franchise. Final Fantasy 15 can be baffling in some of its questionable choices, but across the board, it hits more than it misses. It hums with an energy and compassion that I loved, a sense of camaraderie, friendship and adventure that fills an old and struggling formula with new relevance.

Polygon - 9/10

>Kotaku admits they don't know what Final Fantasy is

9 put of 10 from our guys at polygon

>8/10 Gamespot

They really haven't.

Don't lie. You were 15 at the time, get the fuck out.

>top notch combat
>terrible mechanics

Why bother lying when it's so easy to check?
ign.com/articles/2016/11/28/final-fantasy-xv-review

IGN:
When I’m riding chocobos across the beach at dusk with my three friends and hunting iconic Final Fantasy monsters in a huge, picturesque open world, Final Fantasy XV feels like nearly everything I could want from a modern Final Fantasy. But when it funnels me into linear scenarios and drab, constricted spaces that plunge the simplistic combat into chaos, my blood boils a bit. There is so much good here, so much heart - especially in the relationships between Noctis and his sworn brothers. It just comes with some changes and compromises that were, at times, difficult for this long-time Final Fantasy fan to come to grips with.

>8.2

Yep. Because it's Final Fantasy.
The reviewers will take chances they get to shit on bad games, but they can't afford to call a big name release out on shittiness.

Man reviewers don't know how final scores work

>7s used to be bad
>now 8 is considered bad

Boy I can't wait till the millennials make 9 a bad score leaving only 10 as good.

I want to lick Noctis' poop and pluck out each one of his pubic hairs with my teeth haha,
Will I like this game?

>pointing out bandwaggoners
>crying
Dude just stop posting you are embarasing yoursellf. Don't even like FF just wanted to see how many of you are so unorginal that you LE epic TV man opinions.

>implying its not tongue in cheek with the ifrit blunder
Review had literally just came in when I posted it anyway so I didn't see it

People aren't lying, they are just making predictions. I don't think anybody realized that IGN review is out yet.

>75/100
we got fucking cucked bros

One of the first things you see when you boot up the game is this claim "A Final Fantasy for fans and first-timers." It's a strange statement; fans can't agree on what makes a good Final Fantasy game, and who knows why newcomers shied away from the series in the past. It's been a long ten years since Final Fantasy XV was first revealed, and tastes have changed in the meantime. While it's safe to assume fans and outsiders will find some aspect of Final Fantasy XV disappointing--be it the shallow story or finnicky Astrals--it would be hard for anyone to deny that Final Fantasy XV is a fascinating game after giving it a chance. Where its characters fail to impress, Final Fantasy XV's beautiful world and exciting challenges save the day.

Why do they all praise the combat system? It's unpolished and unbalanced as fuck

>FFXV decimals away from being a 7/10 game from ign

Reminder than XIII got good reviews.

They're normies. it's made for them.

Why are you lying? Or maybe you're just retarded...

>this game has as many flaws as good design decisions
>but it's very ambitious so I'll give it a 9 :)
They're not even trying that they've been paid at this point.

Normies who just like flashy shit.

Final Fantasy XV is unlike any RPG or open-world experience I’ve played before. It succeeds and struggles in finding its unique stance, but a few problematic designs don’t hold it back from being a hell of a journey. Just days after playing it, I find myself reflecting on it fondly. The thoughts of that damn car are recessed and blanketed by Noctis’ journey and some of the stunning moments that unfolded within it. I wasn’t a fan of Final Fantasy XIII’s sequels, but I hope Square returns with another XV or a similarly designed sequel to iron out the rough spots. There’s a solid foundation here that begs to be explored further.

Instead of buying this turd, preorder Nioh. It's for some reason on sale before release at amazon for 51 bux

He's not lying.

He's just talking shit our of his ass. He doesn't know any better and when FF XIII was released he was only 10.

Then again, the story behind the making of Final Fantasy 15 is kind of a mess too, and it's impossible to know how much of this mish-mash of ideas is the result of its tumultuous history as a spin-off that entered development hell a decade ago or whether this was always what it was meant to be. It's a beautiful mess, though; a fascinating, wonderful, exciting, bold, and often inscrutable mess with endless ambition and the fearlessness to at least try something new with staid genre conventions. Even when it falters, it's never dull, the humanity of its heroes and the warmth of its world shining through even when its story leaves you cold. And if that's not Final Fantasy, I don't know what is.

>replay
>high

lolwut

You can 100% the game is 50 hours.

>These new, highly linear locations include strange experiments at shifting genres. Some of these are more successful than others. When Final Fantasy 15 embraces Uncharted-esque setpieces or partakes in an over-the-top anime-style boss battle, it's fun, if slightly unpolished. When it slips into more startling switch-ups, like ill-advised stealth sections or a bizarre trip into jump-scare horror, things get a little more frustrating.

>The first half of Final Fantasy 15 sprawls, urging players to take it at their own pace and enjoy themselves. The second half feels out of breath in its pacing, moving past whole nations and plot beats far faster than they can be resolved. Numerous side characters and story elements that are slowly developed in the first half are dropped entirely or given disappointingly weak conclusions as a result. This seems impossible to say for a game that's been in development for 10 years, but it feels there were much bigger plans for the second half, as if the developers had to scale back the size of the open world and the scope of the game's plot, and squeeze everything into half the time intended.

>It borders on nonsense, saying that this 60-plus-hour game doesn't have all the time it needs to get things done. But that's what it feels like, at least when it comes to the side characters and pac

>9/10

black_man_with_question_marks.jpg

Did it even receive any perfect scores yet?