Nvidia Rage fuels the Switch

>The switch is going to be just a supercharged Wii U
>There no way the rumors about it being as strong as a Xbox One are true
>There no Way the rumors about it being 900 Teraflops while in portable mode and 1500 teraflops(stronger than Xbox one now) while docked are true
>Pic related surfaces

You know why I think the Switch will be very powerful? Remember Jen-Hsung(Nvidia CEO) talk about his disappointments on Sony and Microsoft for not picking their GPU's instead of cheap ass AMD's ones? I think this is his response to it, and I am loving it.

Price this thing at 199$ Like the rumors are claiming and I think we found the winner of this generation already.

Other urls found in this thread:

arstechnica.com/gaming/2016/10/what-we-know-and-what-we-can-guess-about-nintendo-switchs-insides/
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

I'll believe it when I see the benchmarks senpai

>MFW Zelda BotW will be 1080p 60fps on the Switch.

Finally, feels like Nintendo has invested on a powerful hardware, is been ages, the Game Cube being the last true powerhouse Nintendo ever release. Now we are playing with Power.

"raw" tech power doesn't mean much. the ps3 was technically more powerful than the xbox 360 but 99.99% of games looked worse on the ps3.

>Fooled by a tech demo screenshot

Typical neo neo Sup Forums. Just so you understand there were tech demos of ps3 games that looked better than games do now.

No, you can pretty safely bet that the new Nintendo does not have the strongest leap in processor efficiency ever recorded by man.

>already

we're three years in

>1500 teraflops
so like, more than 100x more powerful than a Titan X Pascal? How did Nvidia do it?

>1280x587
>*actual resolution
This kind of graphical fidelity isn't difficult at such low resolutions, user. I hope that explains things for you :^)

Of course, but take this into consideration, this is a lunch game most likely.

Now compare it to trash like Knack on the PS4 at lunch, my point is that, if this is the amount of visuals the Switch can show off on the get go, imaging when developers start to understand what is inside of it in depth.

This is just the begining.

I need it to be more powerful than Wii U just so that we can get Xenoblade X in 1080p. That's literally all I need from this console in terms of power.

No, all you need is a swift asskicking.

Is already coming user, here, latest leak that came out today, people are saying is Xenoblade X Switch edition.

>Xbone
What about PS4?

It's not BC, user.

Ehh, I could see it breaking 1 TFLOP, but I doubt it'll be anywhere near the 1.84 of the PS4.

The Fallon footage confirms BotW is 30 fps.

Really, it just need 1 TFlop to get 3rd party.

And the scorpio and PS4 pro and PC will be moving onto VR, where it takes 2-6 times the processing power

Chinks sure are cutting edge innovators

what is that supposed to be

ports user

explain, please. I want my anti-aliased XCX in 1080p

>to get 3rd party
It can have all the tflops in the world and it's still going to be abandoned by 3rd parties when their games don't sell

And the Scorpio and PS4 Pro are suppose to be luxury versions of the One and PS4, not it's own account.

Actually is the other way around.

Some people started to analyze the moment link throughs the rock down and the explosion occurs frame by frame, people are saying is not steady 60fps, but more like 50fps.

Regardless, nice try on miss informing people.

Considering the Tegra X1 could hit over 1 TFLOP, I wouldn't be surprised if this new chip can do 1.4.

yeah it must be amazing
it's not like nvidia would lie to sell their products
it's not like everyone said wii u would be amazing

>anti-aliased
You're kinda asking for the moon here
This is a Nintendo device

Holy fuck, can you autistic faggots wait until direct video of the Switch Zelda is shown before you do autistic technical breakdowns?

The only one misinforming people is you. Fallon footage is 60fps but the game runs at 30 fps. You can tell it isn't 60 fps just by looking at it

Stop saying this. The X1 hits 1 Flops using a mode that no one uses, FP16. People use FP32

Look in the middle user's, what it looks like.

Pic related for the extra help.

Why do people care so much about hardware? Better hardware doesn't always mean better games and this is coming from an idort.

Ps4 isnt relevant anymore, user.

>believing bullshots
epic

because 3 consoles means fanboys which means competition, and hardware is the only meaningful thing to argue about. Which is pretty ironic since if you wanted good hardware you'd buy a PC

It's 900 GIGAflops you fucking animal.

Stop mentioning the Maxwell Tegra Chip, specs for the newer Pascal Tegra havn't been disclosed yet. Of which this is a custom one.

>Better hardware doesn't always mean better games and this is coming from an idort.
It doesn't but it helps. Just look at Xenoblade. Beautiful game, held back by 720p and jaggies. "But Xenoblade wasn't a good game", sure but every Wii U game also would have looked better on better hardware at no expense to the gameplay

Better hardware won't make a bad game good but it will make a good game look better. Why shouldn't everyone want that? Why does Nintendo have to constantly deprive that from its fans?

>What is FPS Frame by Frame analysis

You have to love how words fly over their heads.

Where is that picture from tho?

Can you Not see the obvious Blue "U", With the Grey "Wii" next to it, on a black background?

That still doesn't explain anything.

Hard to jduge it until we actually see it running or know what is. Might as well be grass and trees with barely anything going on, at which points it's barely more than a tech demo

Pascal tegra is 750 gflops
>it's c-c-custom
Won't change very much, it's still based on the same architecture, they just have to add security processors to it to prevent piracy

If Nintendo sells the switch for 199 and releases a full fledged Pokemon game for it, it will sell 50 million systems.

...

Frame by frame analysis has revealed it to be 30 fps. The frames in between the main frames are very obviously interpolated frames. Video games do not render with super imposition

Why do drones always pretend Nintendo's next hardware is going to be so powerful when we all know it won't be? Nintendo's suit isn't power and it hasn't been since the GC

I really just don't understand this angle. Is it because we don't know shit for games besides ports of 2-5 year old games and Wii U remasters? "It's all about the games" is usually the argument for Nintendo consoles but it doesn't even have that going for it at the moment

>comparing Nvidia flops with AMD flops

next you will say that the RX480's 5.8 Tflops > GTX 1060 4.4 Tflops

I guess you ignored all the other pics OP been posting

>Only grass and trees
Yeah, something most developers can do perfectly nowdays right user? it does not matter how well detailed it looks, is just grass, is not like it would improve the graphical fidelity of a game.

Some people comments man, god.

>Nvidia Rage fuels the Switch
What a stupid faggot headline.

>There no way the rumors about it being as strong as a Xbox One are true
No one said this.

>The switch is going to be just a supercharged Wii U
What does Supercharged even mean? since it's not a defined basically anything more powerful than a WiiU is a super charged WiiU. A PS4 is a super charged WiiU. An Xbox One is a super charged WiiU.


arstechnica.com/gaming/2016/10/what-we-know-and-what-we-can-guess-about-nintendo-switchs-insides/

>Won't change very much
We don't know at all. How about we wait till January when they tell us the specs?

Doesn't look like anything to me

A flop is a flop, you can't say it only AMD

Nvidia vs AMD is not going to make the difference between 750 gflops and 1.4 tflops

And let's pretend, just for a moment, that it did.

So. fucking. what. The Switch is as powerful as a 2013, obsolete console that was the weakest of its generation that's about to be replaced. Whoopdy fucking doo.

You act like being as powerful as the Xbone is a GOOD THING, when it's not even fucking true.

>developed by Crytek

Into the trash it goes. Have fun with your tech demo

Nvidia can do it. When companies are put in a corner with noone willing to buy their design wins, miracles start happening.

You are comparing architectures now.

Funny through, given Nvidia flops actually weight more usually.

Here you go, dumb dumb

It was just hard to use because it had 7 weird cores and a weaker GPU.

>Crytek

It's by some new French indie dev.

In the end it doesn't matter because every console runs like shit, I should know, I have them all.

It's like saying my shit doesn't smell as bad as yours, but they both still smell like shit.

>How about we wait till January when they tell us the specs?
Because this is Nintendo and they will never talk about the specs? Please point to me when they talked about specs for the Wii or Wii U. Yeah, it didn't happen.

And I'm not the one making threads about how powerful the fucking thing is going to be, so don't tell me not to talk about it. How about YOU stop making threads about how powerful it will be so when we all know it's going to be underpowered like all Nintendo hardware?

>mfw Sonyniggers are entering panic mode

Is coming my friends, soon we will send then all back to sonygaf.

>60fps
>2016
HAHHAHAHHAHHAHAHA

LOL is this supposed to be proof of 60 fps?

CAMERAS CAPTURE NATURAL MOTION BLUR. Notice how only ever OTHER frame moves distinctly, and the between ones are only slight moves.

DELET

THIS

I don't think people who like Nintendo care as much as people who like shitposting about graphics.

>Wii U
They showed the specs for the Wii U, through a press release

>How about YOU stop making threads about how powerful
I didn't make this thread

>when we all know it's going to be underpowered like all Nintendo hardware?
Again, we don't know anything about the specs.

You do know that the Switch has a more powerful CPU than your PS4 Pro in *native* 4K. A Gpu is always bottlenecked by cpu. Having amore powerful cpu, makes a huge difference. Switch, when docket will be more powerful than PS4.

No, it's supposed to be proof of 30fps, hence why I called the guy a dumb dumb
you dumb dumb

Nintendo's shit is far stinkier than the other guy's though. I mean, when compared to PC, yes, the other consoles are bad. But Nintendo is bad compared to the other consoles, so what is Nintendo when compared to PC? It's total dogshit, man. Many games on the Wii U would actually look pretty good if they could run on decent hardware. Would it matter in the end? I don't know, but I would have enjoyed those games more, that's all I can say

>Again, we don't know anything about the specs.
We can infer so much from so many different angles and sources and yet you really insist on waiting a month to confirm it, especially when shitposters continually make threads about how powerful it's going to be?

>This is proof that the game does not run at 60fps

How log sonyniggers have fallend, I guess this is what happends when you can only enjoy at 30fps for years.

>from so many different angles and sources
lol

>“For us, it’s not about specs, it’s not about teraflops, it’s not about the horsepower of a particular system. For us, it’s about the content,” Nintendo of American president Reggie Fils-Aime told Bloomberg.

No idea how this is funny given the PS4 can't do 60fps after all this years.

I can't wait for it to come out and see people be surprised that a tablet has tablet hardware

So you mean to tell me that if the Switch WAS powerful, he would have said
>“For us, it’s not about fun, it’s not about content, it’s not about the games of a particular system. For us, it’s about the specs,”
?
Also remember that the Wii U was still alive then, he couldn't say, yeah the Switch is super powerful so stop buying Wii U because it's shit.

Look I'm not saying the Switch will be powerful, but you can't say we already know it. Because we don't.

yeah I'm sure you're an >t. expert

Has any tegra tablet even managed to beat a 360 yet?

I'm saying if they were making the Switch to be powerful, that would be a marketing angle and they would be taking every advantage possible. They're going to be severely downplaying the power because I suspect the Switch won't even be 1 tflop

And we know a lot more than that, and I'm not talking about twitter rumormongers. I'm talking about Nvidia.

I'm talking about we know how powerful the Pascal Tegra chip is already and it's only about twice as powerful as the Wii U.

>b-b-but it's custom
Well, yeah, but there's increasingly less room to wiggle here. The specifications of the Switch, or rather, the *best possible case scenario* for it, as it could easily be worse, is shaping up to be pretty ho hum, and these are far more concrete than Emily Rogers

I'd really like to ask you why this is so important. Why is it so important that people think it could *possibly* be more powerful than it appears it will be? My conclusion is that people who act like you are shills. You don't want the public to make up its mind on the product before they see it, so you want to dismiss all the solid facts we have as "it's not proof of anything until we officially know everything"

I'm sorry but that kind of thinking kept man in the dark ages for the better part of a millennium. Just because we can't prove something conclusively doesn't mean it isn't true, and it's just absurdly improbable based on what we know and the fact that it is inherently a mobile device that the Switch will be as powerful as the dated 8th gen consoles. It's not going to happen in any way shape or form, the question isn't if it will be less powerful but how much less powerful it will be.

>rumor
>rumor
>rumor
>grass and trees
Yeah great, some nintendofags man, god

>Can't tell Teraflop from Gigaflop
>Doesn't know Nvidia advertises 16 bit FLOPS to make the numbers look bigger
>Thinks you can compare FLOPS between different architectures
Even by Sup Forums standards you have no idea what you are talking about

CEASE MOTOR FUNCTIONS

>Thinks you can compare FLOPS between different architectures
The reason flops between AMD and Nvidia differs is because of other hardware like memory bandwidth playing a role as well as driver and game optimizations

If the chips were strictly crunching numbers, the same amount of flops on AMD and Nvidia would yield very comparable results

Those Nvidia Shields costs like $300 or $400 or some shit, Nvidia won't be putting any impressive tech into those Wii-3s if they're only $200.

>Those Nvidia Shields costs like $300 or $400 or some shit
Their little console with the Tegra X1 Maxwell (the most powerful mobile chip on the market) is like $250.
I've seen refurbished ones sold by Nvidia for like $180.

>French game based on Novel
>post-civilization
>all forest shots
>it's noted you play an aspy and his dog
I have a feeling this game wont challenge the hardware at all

>company which is known for pricing their products to consumers much higher than necessary has a product which costs a lot
>this obviously means that the cost of one component to be used by a AAA company will cause their product to be priced similarly

any more leaps in logic you'd like to make?

But this was originally posted by a Nintendo fan on a Nintendo subreddit.

It doesn't need to be as powerful as the Pro or Scorpio, it just needs to be a s powerful as the Xbone so devs can't use the "power" excuse not to port multiplats.

>pretty walking simulator #295: aspie edition

Simply amazing. Apologize right now sonyggers. Nintendo literally won.

Nvidia isn't a first-party dev so they don't make as much as the big three in game sales plus it's running Android instead of a locked-down OS like consoles. This means they have to make a profit on the hardware itself.

>1280x587
oh i am laffing

power isnt really the issue, its the system architecture. since xbone and ps4 use x86 its much easier to port games between them and pc. the reason devs use power as an excuse is because its quicker and cheaper to have a bunch of programmers who cant optimize worth dick than to shell out some extra cash to make the game run better at launch. with more ram and a faster cpu speed, you can get away with code that uses more memory than necessary and takes longer to compute as well. its the same thing with compression too, since 50gb is the standard blu ray size and 1tb is standard hdd size, devs wont bother to compress their games even before installing them and you end up wasting way more space because for some reason the devs thought you needed to have every single language pack for audio installed

It's cropped for letterbox.

Without seeing it in motion, it does seem to be at least on par with the Xbox One.

Bonus points if it has better CPU.

>Nvidia Rage
>AMD Fury
Why are these companies so mad Sup Forums?

im curious about the transfer speeds of the switch's game cards. depending on how fast it is, you can get away with a lot more when it comes to loading textures and such