From all the huge, mainstream, "AAA" studios, this is the best one

From all the huge, mainstream, "AAA" studios, this is the best one.

Prove me wrong

Other urls found in this thread:

youtu.be/GWVtZJo-HqI
youtube.com/watch?v=qFbkXffa85E
twitter.com/SFWRedditGifs

Blizzard exists.
There, proved wrong

sharkcards

"best" is too strong of a word. "least worst" seems more fitting.
And besides, it's only leave worst by virtue of barely actually releasing anything, a la Valve. And CD Project seems pretty much mainstream AAA by now.

They're the most consistent in quality, for sure. Even their worst games, like LA Noire for example or GTAV if we want to be dramatic, are above average

The only thing preventing me from calling them a prefect studio is the jewish tricks they pull every now and then, although i guess arguably that's standard procedure for these companies

>microtransactions
>shitty DLC
Maybe in the past but Rockstar have been about as bad as Ubisoft since GTA V.

>Blizzard exists.

Besides Shark Cards and the entirety of GTA Online, yes I'd have to agree. They're some of the best in gaming when it comes to details and they don't seem to rush their games. They also don't whore themselves out to gaming outlets. Rockstar let's the hype do the talking, release a teaser and sit on it for awhile. All in all, if they abandoned GTA Online then they would be probably the best AAA dev.

P.S. If they don't use the original multiplayer from the original Red Dead redemption, and try some GTA Online shit then they will be the worst ever.

Tl;dr - They don't rush their games resulting in glitchy messes. Don't whore out to gaming outlets about new games. Excluding GTA Online/shark cards they'd be the best imo.

Also, they need to release some single-player DLC for V. That probably won't happen, considering they're a big AAA company. That's their prime money maker, so can't blame em. But we need an Undead Nightmare for GTA V or TBOGT story. Maybe about Trevor and Michael's bank robbing days? Too bad it'll NEVER, EVER happen.

>microtransactions
The only thing you can buy with real-world money is in-game money, which if you buy, you're effectively paying so you don't have to play as much. If you don't do it yourself, you'll pretty much never feel the presence of microtransactions in GTAV
>shitty DLC
You are entitled to your opinion, but at least all of it is free. Personally, my friends and I have a lot of fun with it

WAS one. Don't forget GTAO that single handedly destroyed the franchise.

LMFAO!

Nah you're probably right. Looking forward to RDR2 and GTA VI. Just hope the online for GTA VI has a bit more to it. GTA V online just seemed pointless after a while.

Naughty Dog exists

The process of getting money in Online is a tedious bore and it takes time to even get a garage to park your car. The presence of microtransactions is too bad. It's something that shouldn't be tolerated in gaming.

Back in IV's day they had two full standalone DLC's. Now it's just shitty new cars I'm not interested in playing with because I've already completed the game and because it's so story focused I don't have any interest in playing otherwise. Haven't touched V in years.

GTAO being utter shit didnt took a small bit away from my enjoyment of GTA V tb h. i just ingore it.

>No Single player dlc
>GTO is a grindfest and shit
>Sharkcards

No

But the problem is that they focused too much on GTAO during GTAV development which is one of the reasons we got ZERO story DLC for GTAV.

>forced to join their shit-box social network
>games laced with bad design decisions
>games over-produced to the point of being unplayable

I respectfully disagree with your summation of this games development company.

eh, i agree about that part. but i prefer looking it more "optimistic"
Sand Andreas or Vice City didnt have any dlc's and online, so when i ignore GTA:O is the same

>its just new cars

and yachts and the ability to own stuff like meth labs and steal and mod and sell cars in high speed chases all in free roam with other real players, and KITT from nightrider, and a tron bike

honestly they stole so much i dont know how they arent getting sued

You're absolutely right. Sup Forums hates blizzard for literally no reason.

Owning property was one of the most disappointing features in V and the whole meth thing is some Breaking Bad which was amusing for all of 5 minutes.

>buy shark cards or get a random ban

Problem is that they aren't creating many games as they used to, i understand, creating new gmaes are more and more difficult and expensive.

I would love to see a Bully 2, a Manhunt game, etc but sadly, it seems that the only games that we're getting this gen are RDR 2 and GTAVI.

fpwp

*meme

I don't care until Midnight Club 5 is real.

And it won't be real anytime soon because San Diego is busy working on that shit known as RDR2.

even their worst games are creative, innovative, polished and full to the brim with content

the standards of R* are way beyond anyone else in the industry

>"best" is too strong of a word. "least worst" seems more fitting.

This is the dumbest fucking thing I've read all day.

It would having to get Ned Luke, Steven Ogg and Shawn Fonteno for a reunion DLC.

>amusing

you dont have to be in your motorcycle club for them to keep working and making product, you just have to be in a free roam session, you can just screw around or even be CEO and steal and mod and sell cars or whatever to make even more money while your workers make you money

That sounds like the most boring thing ever. The whole BB meme got old real quick.

When you really think about it, Rockstar are the luckiest motherfuckers around, they were this close to disappear if it wasn't for something that happened in early November.

?

>wow having a passive income, thats so boring

dude you're not getting it

you can fly around in a rocket car while your businsesses are accumilating 1-2 million dollars worth of product

or whatever you want

What are you talking about?

*do whatever you want

what's the point of having an income? Urgh... why?

Oh....OH, I GET IT NOW.

Shit, you're right.

They were until gtaV

Red Dead Revolver

Red Dead Redemption

Red Dead Redemption 2

If you're an edgy 13 years old, then sure.

well the guy i was talking to for one sounded like he was poor as fuck and couldnt afford any of the cool shit that makes the game actually fun, he acted like all that exists is some mundane lambos and shit

But GTA 5 is a shiny soulless turd. The game >literally< has 0 personality.

I'm the same guy you're talking to y'know. Cool shit? BB meme is all you have.
V post-game is such a bore.

Still no

Bully 2

Manhunt 3

Max Payne 4

Yawwwwwnnnnnnn

underrated post

well for one i was banned from GTA Online for using MSI Afterburner's in-game overlay to monitor fps and temps and they permanently banned me with no appeal.

Kek all that money for cool stuff right? It just turns into anoissing war between 4 people blowing money on weapons and armaments to kill each other over and over again. It's boring as shit after an hour

The best piece of shit is still a piece of shit, OP. GTAV is all shine and no substance, RDR is reddit-tier overrated, and Max Payne 3 is a borderline walking sim.

>i grinded really hard and blew all my money on dumb sports cars before the cool stuff came out wahh shit game

i bet you're consolefags who thought its worth playing at 11 fps too

This guys gets it and even more boring since V has none of the physics that made IV funny so long after.

>the ability to own stuff like meth labs and steal and mod and sell cars in high speed chases all in free roam with other real players, and KITT from nightrider, and a tron bike

Which also requires tens of hours of grinding money in game, unless you purchase shark cards (or get someone to glitch you money)

I didn't grind. When I realised it'd take an age to get a fucking garage I quit. Quit and never turned back.

>consolefag
I played the game when it came out, not years after.

>But we need an Undead Nightmare for GTA V or TBOGT story.

A San Andreas reboot as single player DLC with CJ as protagonist would be a good idea, since a lot of people wanted a CJ cameo or something in V once they heard it was set in that city, must people are not aware or don't care this is a different universe.

>Sand Andreas or Vice City didnt have any dlc's and online

Because back then online multiplayer and DLC weren't as prevalent as it is today, only the original Xbox did DLC and paid online.

Rockstar WAS really good. Especially in the sixth generation

Bully, Manhunt, The Warriors, Vice City, San Andreas all great games.

But they changed from a game company to Valve 2.0.

its not too bad if you're playing with people who live in a first world country and arent consolefags, but yeah ive noticed on xbox one, and in servers full of chinks, and some eastern european shitholes like russia or slavia, everyone is out to get you

you make enough money to buy a garage in 10 minutes in free roam now, sorry you played the game too much at shit quality when it was unfinished and got a bad taste in your mouth

Rockstar would be fucking brilliant if the Housers would suck it up and actually hire good writers.

The whole "let's just rip off a movie and make it really dumb and audacious" thing was great when they made silly PS2 games but now they've got world-class technology to make their fan fiction and it just doesn't work.

spbp

I only got a bad taste from Online. Storywise V was good even if the ending had a disappointing choice.

Most open-world games suffer post-story which is why open-world is such an overrated genre.

Yup. Almost no side activities, shitty combat, worse AI than GTA IV, grindfest GTAO and shitty post-game are destroying the game somehow. I've more fun playing GTA IV at the moment by just playing around with the physics even though it's post game and side activities aren't that much better.

>"best" is too strong of a word. "least worst" seems more fitting

nigga

>But they changed from a game company to Valve 2.0
This. Everyone did it and so did they.

As leddit says: either you die a hero or live long enough to see yourself become the villain.

The problems they have with Benzies only show how much R* has fallen.

Nope.

They're too pussy to develop Manhunt 3, despite the fact that you can release Adults Only games on Steam.

Rockstar doesn't give a fuck about Steam and the PC market, though. They'll gladly release a version a year late on that platform because they know they can take advantage of idiots and get them to buy the same game twice.

>by virtue of barely actually releasing anything
as they should. they actually put work into each title, even if some of it falls flat in exchange for a lot of content (mostly talking gta v there). should gtas be yearly clones like call of duty?

In their defense, nobody makes AAA adult-only games anymore. They'd have to put shitload of money into it while receiving poor return thanks to limiting their market so heavily.

>muh physics

what exactly is even different aside from the AI not being so dramatic in death

the cars drove like shit anyway, and theres way faster and cooler cars in V from the last update like the ramp or rocket car to fuck around with physics, you can just mod them into singleplayer too cant you?

hell the tron bike, just driving that with the max engine upgrades along the highway around the desert, gracefully dodging all the cars at the last millisecond, is so sick

thats all true for the remastered console version too, you retard

That's not a fucking excuse.

Controversy always sells. Look at HATRED.

This.

user really? Hatred is not AAA, it's very low-budget and it didn't really sell all that well.

It's so bad that even games like Battlefield 1, a fucking WW1 game, don't have so much as limbs that can be torn off.

What's your point, that Rockstar does retarded shit? Thanks for the news flash, dawg.

>single player DLC with CJ as protagonist
thatd be a huge fucking cash cow for them, they wouldnt even have to rewrite all that much. really i just want more nigger simulator

>what exactly is even different aside from the AI not being so dramatic in death

still fucking brutal btw, you just don't see it because the animations are cut by players who continue shooting after they've done enough damage

if you ever want to see it without modding, just ask someone to shoot a couple revolver rounds into your chest

Only thing i like about rockstar is driving in gta
Couldn't care for anything else they out out
>inb4 but muh bully and red dead
Bully is dead and the new red dead will probably be shit

>games over-produced to the point of being unplayable
what did he mean by this?

The people who expected it to only come out for a dying console generation, and bought it for that expecting no newer editions to be released, are the ones who were retarded, and they're most likely the bulk of the people who bought a second copy

Is rockstar dumb for taking advantage of your dumb asses?

Nah, lol

You dont understand how the world works, faggot

CJ does not exist in the HD universe

who unseated them as "best", then? gta v had some problems, but what game was released that topped it, by a studio that also doesnt have jewish practices or a bad track record?

Their game and level design is often really shitty but excused because of the sheer scope of the games they release.
They put a lot of effort into their games, which is great, but they are also very lazy in design. You can tell when you have a rockstar game because they are all the same shit.

he mentioned that. but if you write him in, he could. that decision made sense to make way for the V's story, but would anyone give a shit if that was retconned?

GTAV was a huge disappointment

Friendly reminder

youtu.be/GWVtZJo-HqI

youtube.com/watch?v=qFbkXffa85E

I'll take IV's gameplay, combat, and physics over V's realistic flipflops any day.

you honestly should have just said you'd take physics desu user, the gameplay/combat was pretty fucking terrible and showing of a tech demo

>niko constantly stumbling over curbs due to bumping into a car 3 seconds ago
>niko doing reloading gestures instead of actually ejecting the magazine in guns
>"MMA" melee combat where few of the punches actually connect and NPCs can't be attacked from the grouund
>having to zoom in constantly and cornershoot twice as often just to fight players efficiently

no thanks

I'm convinced