"Nintendo 64 offered the world's first analog control stick..."

>"Nintendo 64 offered the world's first analog control stick..."

>The first consumer games console which had analog joysticks was the Prinztronic/Acetronic/Interton series, launched in 1976.

Are blatant lies the last resort of a sinking company?

Other urls found in this thread:

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_Analog_Joystick
twitter.com/SFWRedditVideos

Well, they were the first that did it, same for a lot of other things. The fact you retards always have to say they're NOT innovative means they are because they retards don't like facts. It's fine if you don't like it, but get a hobby, man.

>Well, they were the first that did it, same for a lot of other things.

Is it that difficult to at least read the OP?

Here, let's repeat it.
>The first consumer games console which had analog joysticks was the Prinztronic/Acetronic/Interton series, launched in 1976.

Why do you want to reinforce the Nintendo fan persecution complex?

Nintendo did things first just as always AND THEN then the industry followed. You'll see that pattern over and over again. Look at the Wii for example. Microsoft and Sony both wanted that kind of success but they wouldn't dare to be that innovative, they play it safe. Nintendo formed the industry and the trends, the gameplay, 3D gaming, and to this day focus on games instead of gimmicks. Sony just creates fucking movies nowadays.

Here, let's repeat it once again:
>The first consumer games console which had analog joysticks was the Prinztronic/Acetronic/Interton series, launched in 1976.

Let's add the date the nintendo 64 came out, shall we?
The nintendo 64 came out in 1996.
Care to say how nintendo could possibily did it first, being 20 years late?

>nintoddler can't read
why am i not at all surprised

Its a shame the n64 only offered 2 games worth playing to use that thumbstick.

Maybe he thinks that the "64" in the name means the year it came out or something...

You don't understand, man.

Nintendo were the first to make the analog stick MAKE SENSE

>Focus on games instead if gimmicks
Are you retarded? Everything after the gamecube has been centered on gimmicks.

what the fuck happened to nintendo?

>nes- great
>n64- fantastic
>gamecube- great
>wii- meh
>wiiu- kill yourself
>switch- descend into hell and get assraped by the devil

>it's a pong box
>it's not a thumbstick

oh no you're retarded

>Nintendo did things first just as always AND THEN then the industry followed

>nintendo was the first to use CDs
>nintendo was the first to use hdmi
>nintendo was the first to introduce the analog
>nintendo was the first to introduce paid online
>nintendo was the first to introduce DLCs

>n64- "fantastic" despite having no games
>not listing the SNES, Nintendos finest hour

So are the functionality different?

The N64 stick is actually optical not analog. It works like most roller ball mice. That's why it has nearly no deadzone.

user, did anyone care about that thing? That's right, nobody did. That's why a game like OoT was so groundbreaking. Everyone followed that shit. It's sad that you underage kids always shitpost about this because you're so naive. You'll say nothing is innovative because you think it makes you look smart but it doesn't. I've argued with you dumb fucks so many times but you always say the same stupid shit, even now. See, that's what being an industry leader means. Nintendo being innovitive isn't always a good thing, of course, there's been many examples of them fucking up or doing something that doesn't help gameplay.

>>n64- fantastic
>>gamecube- great
you what son
both had little to no games

at least DS had enough games

>No games
Rare alone made more good exclusives than the PS4 and Xbox One combined

>user, did anyone care about that thing

Sure nobody cared, but still that analog came out 20 years prior to the nintendo 64.
That's all I'm saying, user.
Nintendo may or may not have copied from that and we will never know.

2 games is pretty good considering the ps4 has 1 game

Who cares about the n64 compared to the ps1 lol

History did

>n64 - 32m
>ps1 - 102m
oops

All these words just to ignore the main point which has been repeated several times within this very thread alone -

Nintendo said they were the first to do something and they weren't.

The point of contention is about industry impact or how well Nintendo's thing worked or anything else.

Just reword the very first line of this thread to what Nintendo could have said:

>"Nintendo 64 revolutionized gaming with its analog control stick."

No foul there. No claim that they were the first. No lie. Want to argue about what "revolutionized" means? Sure, fine, great. But at least it's not a flat-out lie as opposed to saying "the world's first".

If it's not "the worlds first", just don't say it is "the world's first". Simple.

>The point of contention is about industry impact or how well Nintendo's thing worked or anything else.

The point of contention is >NOT< about industry impact or how well Nintendo's thing worked or anything else.

Excuse me.

What the fuck went wrong nintenbros???
Literally shaking right now.......

It's not a lie, user. They were the first. Playstation didn't have sticks in the beginning. I'm not sure why you care so much about this. Take botw for example. The open world thing has been popular ever since GTA 3 but I can't think of any open world game that actually focuses on gameplay like botw. Are they the world's first this time around? Not exactly but they were the first to implement shit I've wanted to see in a long time, many features most games don't even have.

>but I can't think of any open world game that actually focuses on gameplay like botw.


>this level of delusion

Are you a retard or just delusional

The main problem with these threads is neo/v has absolutely terrible reading comprehension. I assume because of autism but I don't know.

They can't comprehend the difference between inventing something and innovating something.

For example, Henry Ford didn't invent the production line. He did however innovate the auto industry with it.

It's great. It really is. You couldn't even mention a single game that matches anything Botw does. You know why? That game doesn't exist. But remember what I said and watch what open world games will do after botw is so successful. Companies always copies Nintendo, always have.

>It's not a lie, user. They were the first.
>>The first consumer games console which had analog joysticks was the Prinztronic/Acetronic/Interton series, launched in 1976.
No, they weren't.

> Playstation didn't have sticks in the beginning.
Nobody said they did, though since you want to bring that irrelevant point up, I can cite this item as being a Playstation analog controller which existed before the Nintendo 64 came out:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_Analog_Joystick

> I'm not sure why you care so much about this.
I'm not sure why you can't understand that someone shouldn't say they were "the world's first" to do something when they weren't.

Now that's shitposting

>Are blatant lies the last resort of a sinking company?
If 2016 has shown us anything (trump brexit) it's that blatent lying is to your advantage.

So what PS4 and Xbone exclusives are better than the Rare classics

do you just not know what the term 'analog control stick' means? It's a joy stick Small ones have become a part of modern controllers.

The N64 is a horrible abomination of a controller and its crappy thumbstick is something no one liked. You only saw the damn things become market standard after sony took that technology and made it not shit.

That's because you're dumb, user. Look what user wrote over you. He gets it.

>crappy thumbstick

Understatement.
Damn thing went limp and barely worked after moderate use.

>I will continue saying Nintendo was the first to say something when they weren't
>I will respond to anyone who responds to me saying this without acknowledging that this is false
>I will insult anyone who responds to me

OK.

Told you. That user gets it, you don't.

You're retarded.

Brits introduced nintendo to 3d. A bunch of white dudes created starfox, not nintendo.

>nintendo did things first

sure, they actually thought of the share button first and you faggots are going to defend it

you know what Breath of the Wild is gonna be? A zelda game.

You know what zelda games are? Action RPGs that tend to focus on overworld based movement to the main points of gameplay with a plot that usually makes nods to other games in an increasingly needlessly complex timeline that is mostly an after thought to making a half way decent game.

Nintendo has had a solid library of 1st party titles that they've mined for successful IPs and they've fucked up on Metroid so hard that one looks dead in the water unless some exec in that toy company wearing a consumer electronics company costume realizes that Metroid Other M was shit and they need to imitate Prime or the older platformer games if they want it to sell.

Breath of the Wild won't be anything special in terms of gameplay. It will be pretty, it will be competently put together, and nintendo will be certain not to pull a starfox zero to try and be INNOVATIVE because Shigeru is desperately trying to hide his hatred of Rare licenses and desire to be THE BEST DEV behind doing something new.

a bunch of white dudes that they've continued to actively try and fuck over as hard as possible as often as possible.

>Breath of the Wild won't be anything special in terms of gameplay
I've heard it all before, user. But I've never actually seen anyone make a compelling argument why botw will fail or won't be fun to play. Really makes you think.

>Zelda
>RPG

>gamecube had no games
alright Sup Forums we know your first console was a 360/ps3, but you can stop now

name 1 (one) game

Metroid Prime

If you have to resort to shitposting at least make fun of the GC since all it added apparently was a fucking piece of plastic to carry it around. And even then you need to bring all the cables anyway.

this is bait you retards

...