Popular game is well received

>popular game is well received
>v: "it's shit"
>"how, have you played it?"
>v: "no, but I know its shit" *post cherry picked image*

Any game that's an exclusive.

>the paid shill streamer on youtube told me it was good
>the paid reviews on ign told me it was good
>have you played it???
>no, but i know its good!

>op makes thread on Sup Forums
>acts like he's not a part of Sup Forums

I am tho, I unironically enjoyed Fallout 4

>that one guy shitposting about a game in a thread and you know they just watch some faggot play the game on twitch.

just so we're clear, you can tell a lot about a game by watching someone play it, you don't have to be a little brother to know what it's like to play a video game.

Only slow people cannot do this skill.

>tho

I don't have to play a game before I know it's shit

>dog shit on street
>"it's shit"
>OP: "how, have you tasted it?"
>"no, but I know its shit" *post pic of dog shitting*

not an argument

And if it isn't exclusive then the console is shit.

TITO DICK

Is that Tito 'Dick' Dickman, baby?

IT'S

The argument is that video games can be determined to be of inferior quality from observation alone

>IT'S NUT
>V: THE
>NUT
>V: SHACK

>v
Who??

THE

NUTSHACK

What do you think of the nut shack user?

SHAKIN LIKE A SEIZURE

>say game is shit
>"But you have played it for 200 hours so you must like it."
>mfw

What's her name Sup Forums?

Dark Souls 2

>CoD Black Ops

I'm not wrong though. Zombies is just an entire game on itself.

I got a brain stumper for ya.

He raised Phil and loves the ladies.

Borderlands

TITO
"DUBS"
DUBSMAN BABY

>Sup Forums: This game is great!
>Tumblr: This game is great!
>Sup Forums: This game is shit and we have never said otherwise!

It was exactly this with undertale and fnaf

>Popular game is well received
>v: "it's shit"
>how, have you played it
>v: "yes, *explains why*
>WOW WAY TO USE MEMES AND BUZZWORDS YOU DIDN'T ACTUALLY EVEN PLAY IT BECAUSE IF YOU DID YOU WOULD HAVE LIKED IT

>this delusion

>Game comes out
>Sup Forums: "Its okay"
>Tumblr/Reddit: "OH MY GOD GREATEST GAME THAT EVER CAME OUT"
>Tumblr/Reddit: *Post fan art and 300 lore/fan videos*
>Sup Forums: "Faggots"
>Neo Sup Forums: "Lmao hating things that are popular? Hahah what a bunch of contain retards with out any opinion"

>when groups of people fight over whose game is better by claiming that it "isn't mainstream crap for the normies"
>these same people call actual obscure games bad because "dude not popular enough"

>what is user scores

>if it's not tied to one console the console is shit
?

TITO

This is the worst case of revisionist history I've seen in a while. That's not how it works and you know it.

>first greentext is definitive truth
>second is unrelated to first and logically false
really made my head work

...

yeah

Look at the numbers of user critics for each game. UT has way more 0/10 reviews that shill other games like Trials in the Sky.

how does this compare to The Nutshack

It doesn't have robot monkey in it

DICKMAN BABY

TLOU is not entertaining in any way, The Nutshack is entertaining.

One is a mediocre product that you have absolutely no interaction with whatsoever and basically just watch for a few minutes, since you can't take alot of it in one day.

>v
go back to where you came from

>Sup Forums says a game is shit
>it's shit
>Sup Forums says a game is good
>it's shit
>Sup Forums says a game is mediocre, only worth buying in a sale
>it's 9/10 GOTY material
Everytime.

League of Legends.

My life drastically improved after quitting.

wtf i love tumblr now!!

>insane fanboys in a shellnut

You mean all the time?