What happened?
What happened?
Other urls found in this thread:
youtube.com
youtube.com
youtube.com
twitter.com
They figured out that they have to make the game run on Switch
Its called bullshots. How stupid are you?
The usual. Use an overpowered engine on the reveal with more realistic shading and change art direction and engine on release
Killzone2.png
user, the Switch is more powerful than the Wii U.
You fell for a Bullshot concept trailer that wasn't gameplay and thought it was and your comparing it to the final product.
You would think that people would stop misinterpreting shit after the travesty that is every Ubisoft game reveal.
But no. We get threads like these every year for every game that had a gorgeous reveal trailer.
It's called Nintendo lying to you, like they're lying when they say Switch won't replace 3DS
Ok.
Leave.
And Motorstorm, PS3's were around 800 US DOLLARS here when it came out and friend of mine asked a loan to buy one when he saw those "gameplay trailers".
A year later stores had them going for about 200 to get rid of the damn things.
yikes that image killed all my hype for botw.
No.
The Switch being stronger that a U doesn't really say anything.
He's saying ok because it still looks like fucking shit.
Not really, user. Not really at all.
Or rather, it's not. Not at all.
Why is the contrast so shit?
That isn't something that you can blame on a console's strength
They should have followed dragon quest's lead with high detail, but low to no texture
Reminder that this is the first actual gameplay footage
Hell, Xenoblade pulled this off to expert detail. Pun intended.
and this is a recent screenshot
removing colors makes the game more cinematic
the top screenshot is being rendered with hype. the bottom is being rendered with actual hardware
Top is a CEMU screenshot
Bottom is the Switch version
They don't use an overpowered engine, moron. They photoshop in extra features and details. It's a composite screenshot, it's fake.
Exit from the current location.
[Decline]
Kay Why Es
uhh the top is a cinematic and the bottom is gameplay?
you didn't actually think the top was gameplay right?
What happened was you cherrypicked a poor looking shot of the game aimed at the ground and the sun isn't rising so it's lacking the dramatic lighting the top pic has
Nintendo's Lazy devs, and retarded hardware enginers thats why
It's not the se area, user.
Top runs at 12 FPS bottom at 30fps
Can't even be assed to make original content can we?
youtube.com
Move your psychical and mental body away from the location at which your are currently at.
that's because
1. engine limitations due to becoming open world
2. console multiplat limitations
And compared it to a cinematic proof of concept teaser trailer of a game that just started development.
>Implying I have a physical body
[Refusal to comply with the conditions presented before one's self]
Yes really, user. The Wii U is complete shit specs wise and the Switch is more powerful.
>just started development
Now I wouldn't say that
yeah, but nobody cares because muh shitposting
It's not like OP zoomed in on an insignificant rock or a tree it's a shot of a seemingly significant area of the game with a good scope of the area with varied landmarks and objects. Is it stupid to expect the game to look like the reveal trailer? Yes, but it would be even more dumb to expect the game to look much better overall than the below shot. I'm sure it looks fine in motion, anyway.
I knew this was going to be shit from trailer 1.
The hud never changed. Shot missiles. Missile Icon didn't change.
My suspicion only grew when every trailer then on had the same Hud with the exact same problem. Nothing changing on it no matter what happened to the character.
So scripted and fake. It's how I feel for Horizon Zero dawn too.
I never once thought the first trailer of Zelda Breath of the wild was the actual graphics of game. Only a fucking moron would believe it would look like that on release.
Wasn't that like 6 months after the initial reveal.
More than enough to make a generic place to showcase a concept.
It was a video.
The grass on the bottom looks the same as the grass on the top up close
Meme is over
Ok.
You are only half true. The Switch's GPU is more anemic but quicker when docked. While mobile is clocked even slower than the Wii U which lowers flops below that of the Wii U's GPU
Low angle vs high shot. At lower angles the grass still looks like that, and in the distance in the above shot the grass looks the same as it does below. Come on, son.
they do this for every game under a reputable publisher. games are for kids and kids don't know shit, just sell em easter eggs with the fuckin yolk inside.
The grass does look like that when you're close to it, as shown here
Second, they are not even remotely the same area. Top doesn't even have patches of dirt like bottom. Third, the recording makes the colors on the bottom look less vibrant than they really are. And fourthly, top isn't actual game play.
oh has the game been released yet?
it must be fun to complain about nothing
ya goofs deepthroated the bait again
not justifying it but
>still falling for bullshots
And there it is, all the shitposters BTFO in a single imag and there's nothing said. Amazing.
>While mobile is clocked even slower than the Wii U which lowers flops below that of the Wii U's GPU
Wasn't that just from the Eurogamer/LKD "leak"?
Not even released & the downgrades are pouring in. Imagine how bad the finished product will be.
It's called a different location and different angle.
Zelda still has the same grass and lighting as the upper picture.
/retarded shitpostingthread of jealous Sony fanboy
Possibly. That's what I've read so far. If it does clock itself as low as people are saying then it would be quite a bit weaker than the Wii U's GPU. Its not like the Wii U was impressive either. Its rumored specs put it around as powerful as an underclocked HD3870.
Comparing flops between different architectures is meaningless
The PS2 has more flops than the iPhone 6, yet it's widely known the latter shits all over the capabilities of PS2, since it can run PS2 era games at much higher resolution, and with better graphical effects
>be pathetic Zelda fan
>desperately want random Anons to approve of your life choices
>try and fix the gamma issue washing out all the color from your shit game
>finally get the grass and sky to look close to ok
>crush the blacks on the screen into fucking oblivion
>think this is fine and will prove your bullies wrong
Actually, it's likely to be more than that. That leak was about half right only. The Foxconn leak from late last year however is almost entirely spot-on. There's only three things they got wrong: 1080p screen, 4G, and hole for air on the back on the dock. Everything else was pretty much 100% right, even down to the neon Joy-Cons and the battery capacities.
What I've gathered is that it's slightly more powerful than the wii u when undocked, but the GPU also has more bells and whistles to work with.
That looks so fucking bad dude. The grass looks nothing alike. You're playing a shitty watercolor.
Looks the same to me my man.
user! This is your advertising boss at Microsoft. I just want you to know that you're doing a bang up job for the Microsoft team. Keep it up!
-Your Jew boss
Ok, Ray Charles.
there's no UI, so I have to assume it's a bullshot again. show me video.
nintendo is just as bad as microsoft if not worse given the shit they're pulling with the switch's online, now paid and the old ROM for a month shitty deal
still nowhere as detailed
Looks great for a handheld.
Mobile games blow this out...
I didn't say phone games. I mean a handheld video game system. Made with the primary function to play games.
Oh, you right.
It's the same grass, retard.
Do you think they just made completely new assets since the reveal trailer?
Are you retarded? It's literally from the Switch trailers.
Why do you post 24/7 about games you know nothing about? The only one pathetic here is you.
Why do Sony fanboys not even care that everyone sees how jealous they are with this kind of threads 10 times a day and they always giving them 500 posts?
I prefer the bottom one desu. Easier on the eyes.
>motorstorm
What? the only good thing about that reveal trailer was the first person camera and the mud interacting with the car
and we still got the later, although less noticeable and less visually detailed