Which game do you honestly think will be the superior game?

Which game do you honestly think will be the superior game?

>Breath of the Wild Trailer
youtube.com/watch?v=zw47_q9wbBE

>Horizon Zero Dawn Trailer
youtube.com/watch?v=RRQDqurZJNk

Other urls found in this thread:

youtube.com/watch?v=DUpPYvELLB8
twitter.com/SFWRedditImages

BotW, Horizon looks really generic.

Horizon will be forgotten after a month. When we reminiscence on the games that came out in 2017 when we're closer to the end of the year, horizon will be a "Oh right, that was a thing wasn't it?" kind of a game

Is that even a question?

youtube.com/watch?v=DUpPYvELLB8

Im buying them both cause I want to play them both. Whether or not one will be better than the other is a non-issue.

>Superior Game

Horizon, but that isn't exactly a compliment. They both look like garbage, but for different reasons. Just because they're open world doesn't mean they're automatically comparable.

Everyone's had massive amount of botox?

This voice act isn't real right. No sane company would allow this.

One game will be GOTY, the other has a Burch in it.

i'll just play both and see

im getting both im going to have fun

The Legend of Zelda - Breath of the Wild, of course! I am going to buy a Switch on day one just like my fellow 4channers, am I right guys?

well you always have to hire m*n and womyn of colour :^)

I would hope they are placeholder

The animation and voice acting I'd a load of shit and the graphics are no where near the launch trailer.

If Botw is even comparable in quality it would be a new low for Legend of Zelda, botw needs to be much better than Horizon.

I'm getting the Collector's Editions of both because I'm not poor. On the fence about canceling my Horizon one, but I'll probably keep it.

>Zelda is a nickname for the feminine name Griselda, which may originally have meant "dark battle", and also the feminine form of the Yiddish name Selig, meaning "blessed", "happy"

> and also the feminine form of the Yiddish name Selig, meaning "blessed", "happy"

A FUCKING JEWISH ROYAL FAMILY

AND GANONDORF IS THE FUCKING MUSLIM THAT HATES JEWS

Horizon looks a lot better both graphically and gameplay wise

>Aloy turning to right is the same animation over and over.

Look at these graphics, my dudes! They are topkek! #PumpedForBOTW

mad

There are much better PS4 games you can use than Horizon for comparison if you really want to. Horizon looks like shit.

I can't tell if shills think these webms look good or if it's just falseflagging.

>Which game do you honestly think will be the superior game?

the one whos main character doesnt look like a man

I didn't know BioWare made Sony exclusives.

Both will be mediocre empty opwn worlds

Ill watch my gf play zelda

That's not an answer

Beep boop my robots, who is excited to just watch the world burn?

>graphics make a game good!

Literally underage

Zelda doesn't look like a man either even though he is supposed to be one. He's like some 4foot shemale baby swining his little bitch ass sword

Horizon looks like shit, BOTW on the other hand will be the next GOTY

You will end up playing it yourself robot, it looks beautiful

>PS4 users
>Bring up graphics as important when making downwards comparisons
>Deny their importance when compared to PC and call PC users graphics whores
Hypocrisy at its finest

Zelda looks way better. It will actually be fun world to explore since it has puzzles, dungeons, and a very interactive world. Horizon looks like it just shooting and Ubisoft towers with a repulsive story.

2 different genres of game, plus why would anyone get Horizon Zero Dawn when there is Witcher 3

Zelda only looks good in the trailer because of the epic music. It was the same with the witcher 3, amazing trailers that make the game look way more exciting than it actually is.

Is Brom our guy?

You can cherry pick screenshots all you want, but Zelda will obviously be the better game.

BotW but Horizon will win all the critics and normies over because it's so by the numbers.

They both are trash.

Horizon looks like Ubisoft trash.

I really do think Zelda looks great, but I'm also concerned it will have Japanese empty open world syndrome.

Item durability puts me off.

This game reeks of nintendo trying to chase what is hot rather than set standards/trends. They arent blizzard; copying shit isnt their forté

i haven't heard normies talking about horizon at all
i'm pretty sure the sole audience is consolewars infantry

>their whispers fill my head with screams

>PLAYSTATION 4 THE PLAYERS
kek

I unironically think both games will be bad but if I had to pick one that would be the worst of the two it would be Horizon.

Zelda looks way better.

The one that isnt a shitty 3d Zelda?

why are we comparing these again?
>both are open world
wow

A lot of my friends and co-workers that don't really play other games than nhl and fifa, have been talking about horizon.

It's probably just a finland thing, but even normies here are sony fanboys.

Both look like garbage, but I think Horizon will edge it out simply because it's combat isn't trash.

Getting both anyways since I'm not a poorfag.

Blame the graphics fags that needed something to point out how a game like BotW is "supposed" to look

Jesus christ does the camera have to fucking dance every time you land a hit? And what's with the drawn out, clunky animations?

Why do people think Breath of the Wild looks bad? It's making clear improvements over the areas that Skyward Sword faltered in.

Honestly whenever I see Horizon gameplay all I can think about is "Didn't I do this in Witcher 3?"

Horizon looks like a better game.

Zelda looks like a unity indie game.

Did you just?! Nah you're baiting

>Literally *teleports behind you*

>Every single enemy in the game drops a weapon
>They break so that you're insentivised to keep picking them up, and so you don't have to manually purge them from your inventory every few fights
I'm not trying to shill, this is really the way it looks to me. Can someone explain why weapon durability is inherently bad? Is it a big chore in other games or something? I want to understand why this is a sticking point in every single thread.

The UI is terrible on Horizion. But it does look like the more enjoyable game. Won't have to buy a new system to play it, and there's way less fog in the way of your draw distance. But neither will even be close to my goty. That goes to Persona 5 and Nier. Mass Effect 4 is pretty low on the list as well with their latest trailers.

...

>Both release within a week of each other
>Both are third person action games with RPG elements
>Both are open world
>Both have stories center around a world dominated by nature with futuristic robots roaming the landscape
>Both feature taming wild mounts
>Both include a crafting system
>Both have combat centered around a bow and melee staff/sword

>They aren't automatically comparable

>Literally Witcher 3

witcher had arrows?

help me bros. I wanna buy a ps4 or a switch but....
I don`t think either will have longevity.

BOTW looks like shit graphically, hands down. But if the gameplay is innovative and has some fresh ideas then I think it might live up to at least some of it`s hype.

HZD on the other side looks better I feel it is way overhyped.

But the ps4 lineup this year looks real promising whereas the switch has only mario.. and that`s only coming out near the end of the year.

I didnt like it in SS. As I said above it feels like ninty is just chasing popular treand like survival games.

Ive always looked at zelda as a puzzel game with an expanding toolset throughout the game.

I know that all the weapons are basically the same but if that is the case why bother with that system in the first place?

I dont feel like it adds any positive dimensions to the game.

PS4 has other existing games you can get, whereas Switch only has Zelda and that motion control game.

If you need portability, get the Switch. If not, get a PS4. It's not so hard user. Although the Switch's lineup is a lot more interesting even though it's pretty barren, but if you prefer quantity over quality, with a few very promising games in between, get a PS4. (DISCLAIMER: I'm a PC gamer, not shilling for anyone here)

But the weapons aren't all the same. The axe chops wood, the sticks can be lit on fire etc.

Zelda, it isn't even close

Crossbows, not as flashy and explody, but pretty much the same. Also the "decision making", and melee combat look the same.

I keep thinking if Horizon released on PC it could've sold pretty well alongside Zelda. Now, with all the people buying a Switch, it doesn't even have a chance.

It keeps you looking for and using new weapons, its more incentive to explore and find things.

Yeah, games you can already play on PC

I didn't like item durability in Skyward Sword either. But In SS, when your shield broke, you had to collect shitty little crafting items and head off to Skyloft to make a new one.
In Breath of the Wild, half of the Bokoblins you fight will drop a new shield for you to use

I feel like this is an absolutely crucial difference. if getting new weapons is not a chore, then weapons breaking is barely an inconvenience.

>If you need portability, get the Switch. If not, get a PS4. It's not so hard user

But he was making his decision based on games so you didn't actually contribute

D-DELET, THE COMBAT IS DEEPER THAN MONSTER HUNTER THIS IS JUST A BAD EXAMPLE

BotW, not because of any of the comparisons, but simply because Guerrilla doesn't make good games. It's like expecting a Bioware game to be good at this point.

>I don`t think either will have longevity.
Switch is new, PS4 is over three years old.

Switch will have some new games, PS4 has mostly ports and games better on PC.

If you want a shitty multiplat box, get a PS4. If you have common sense and aren't lazy, build a cheap PC instead of getting a PS4. Get a Switch if you like the exclusive games on it.

I think zelda will have a better story but horizon will have more interesting gameplay.

I still think if botw was a third party game and not zelda that people would have just ragged on it as just another generic open world game. The world looks really empty and frivolous, and the combat is basic.

I think you could be right. The combat doesn't seem to be deep, but it is certainly the deepest that combat has ever been in the Zelda series. So it's getting praised for that, where it wouldn't be if it didn't have the Zelda name.

Still getting it, though. I'm as guilty as the next guy, I don't really expect great combat from Zelda, I expect the game to make up for that aspect in other ways.

I think they will have their own merits.

Just based on what I've seen, I think it will go like I notice Zelda's flaws way sooner than Horizons. However Horizon's highs are no where near as close as Zelda's highs, ontop of having a worse story/set of characters throughout.

Like Horizon will throw a billion things at you in the opening, shit starts out with a child sequence like fucking AC3 and you get hit with a hundred mechanics and shit all at once while getting 20 fetch quests in the first town. But you might get overwhelmed after like 10 hours.

We've seen the opening gameplay, no overly long tutorials like the series is known for but there doesn't seem to be much besides the shrine in the grand plateau. So for the first few hours you might just feel "eh, its okay" until shit hit the gear with all the characters and bosses.

I'll probably still play it, but I'm in no rush and don't see any reason to not just play it on a wii u or just wait and emulate it.

There hasn't been anything they've shown that really sets me on fire. Open world games have been done to death, you gotta really do them right to make them look special.

I don't really care about both of them, but BotW seems better

I don't have a PS4 and won't buy a Switch, so unless BotW works on CEMU I'll just forget about both

>that hud
eugh

>I still think if botw was a third party game and not zelda that people would have just ragged on it as just another generic open world game.
show one other game that lets you
>Shield sled/snowboard
>Climb literally anything
>Craft
>Use fire physics and wind to hurt enemies
>Use physics objects to hurt enemies
>glide anywhere
>drop bombs while gliding
>catch fish and hunt wild animals
>tame animals
>chop down trees
>use said trees as bridges over gaps that aren't cinematic scripted events
>ZA WARUDO

>THE COMBAT IS DEEPER THAN MONSTER HUNTER THIS IS JUST A BAD EXAMPLE

Has someone really said this?

>but horizon will have more interesting gameplay.
What lead you to this backward conclusion?

Zelda looks like its actually trying to add some depth and interactivity to its open world, something western games have consistently failed to do. Horizon looks like it has a lot of scripted effects and animations in place of actual physics, the world looks like it serves as a backdrop like most existing western open-world games. The combat doesn't look like anything we have not seen before, she's just rolling and poking, not using anything in the environment around her.

Can't tell if you did that on purpose or not and it's driving me nuts.

Good job!

>Although the Switch's lineup is a lot more interesting even though it's pretty barren, but if you prefer quantity over quality, with a few very promising games in between, get a PS4. (DISCLAIMER: I'm a PC gamer, not shilling for anyone here)

But I did mention games.

Probably. GAF keeps included monster hunter in the mashups of games Horizon was supposedly inspired by and improves upon.

Lmao

Shield sledding doesn't look as fun as a LOT of other open world maneuvering gimmicks have.
>climbing
Infamous
>craft
Oh, i'm gonna stop you, you clearly haven't played open world games much if at all.

even BotW trailer is better

Zelda. Is there any question of this? Guerrilla Games are a BAD developer. They have made nothing but BAD FPS games for the last decade. They are Crytek for Sony except they don't even have one game that has good gameplay. Their games are the worst controlling shooters I have ever had the misfortune of playing and platinuming in my life. They are not going to suddenly turn it around because they're making a third person shooter staring some ugly woman.

I mean, Steven Universe has the best voice acting for a western animated cartoon in recent times and it's cast is varied as hell so it's clearly doing something right.

Watching some of the recent gameplay around the hunting and crafting system and how it rewards learning multiple strategies to take down each robot to harvest different components.

I don't think there's much crafting in BotW, if any. It's mostly cooking.

They're similar, but crafting usually involves collecting useless items that you combine into a useful one, instead of combining already edible ingredients into better food items.

Do you really think there haven't been open world games that let you craft, tame animals, hunt, chop down shit?

There's crappy indie games even that have that.

I still don't know where this footage comes from.