What's the best Far Cry game?

What's the best Far Cry game?

2 by far.

First one best one.

>ib4 bullshit enemies, go back to rubbing your nipples over the Souls series

Fights were tough but fair. Very tough... but fair.

The first one.

Though they're all dramatically different games, only unified by their dogshit level design, tedium, and falling short of greatness.

2

bump

blood dragon

>what is the least stinky pile of shit?
Probably Blood Dragon. At least it had gleam on the nuggets.

I had most fun with 2

Don't know why everyone complained about respawning bases and checkpoints. When I played 3, as soon as I took over the last pirate base, the whole map was suddenly utterly devoid of enemies to fight. With the story done, it was very dull.

4 objectively
Its a fun game

Oh and I also liked how there was no little cutaway and menu. If you wanted to check out the map, your character literally pulled out a map in real time. Swapping your guns happened in warehouse with you literally grabbing guns off the shelf for each slot.
And you couldn't just zip from place to place by clicking on it. You had to take the fucken bus.

2 because it throws so much bullshit at you.
4 because it's pretty.

No FC will ever top the nonsensical fun of Blood Dragon, fuck them for Trials

The only thing I didn't like about 2 was searching for diamonds but that's a pretty minor issue. The buddy system and oppressive locale was so much fun to wreak havoc in. Also best radio.

I thought diamond hunting in 2 was pretty fucking rad considering how realistic it was to use a GPS tracker to do so.

>Sometimes the AI decides that tent walls don't exist and gun you down like there is nothing obscuring their vision
>Sometimes they just decide it's your time to die and spot you while you're hiding in a bush 10 metres away even though they are facing the wrong way
>Sometimes the mutants and mercs just ignore each other so they can kill you
>Also rocket mercs never have to reload and will start nuking you as soon as you're visible with perfect accuracy
>Fair

4 with cheats.

Either 1 or 4, for different reasons.

You're listening to Rabi Ray Rana on Radio Free Kyrat!

None.

3

>Far Cry Primal
>you are in Europe
>Your tribe is a bunch of honourable African warriors with blue eyes
>Enemies are white skinned imperialistic cannibals
Into the trash

>malaria


what the fuck were they thinking?

Anyone who says 2 is objectively wrong. Repeating the same two missions for the entire game isn't fun. You effectively master it within 30 minutes of playing and there's no incentive to play past that except a fucking terrible story.

Not to mention there was absolutely nothing to it
>kill these bad guys
>kill these visually different but fundamentally identical bad guys
>a winner is you

3 > 2 > BD > 4 > 1 > Primal

Primal

It's comfy as fuck

It's fucking boring

Not to mention this

>Sup Forums hated FC3
>loved Blood Dragon even though it was the same thing with a different coat of paint and an ironic presentation
Really makes you think

I want to play fc1 and 2 and i want it to be challenging, should i just go in highest difficulty?

Can't deny it had atmosphere though.
It also wasn't a slave to the Ubisoft formula so it doesn't feel like you're playing AssCreed with guns.

Yeah all that wildlife the game featured was really engaging. Oh wait.

Most fun with 2. The setting was greeat, graphics great for the time and gunplay decent.

Would love to have another Africa based Far Cry with lions, Elephants, Giraffes etc. Great setting.

There's so much more to atmosphere than that though, and there was wildlife in FC2, it was just part of the scenery and not about hunting ten zebras to craft a new wallet.
You seem a bit pissy so I'd just like to make it known that I don't think Far Cry 2 is a particularly good game, but I think it did some things a lot better than 3 and 4.

Sup Forums hates everything popular. They used to love Witcher 3, now they hate it. They used to Love Dark Souls 3, but now that that is normie, Sup Forums is saying that 2 is better, even though most here were disappointed when it came out. And so on...

>atmosphere
The whole game was colored brown. Three and four, especially three had a better atmosphere, not to mention Vaas in three.

Yeah nah you're being silly. The modern games have better atmosphere because of colours and animals that take fifty headshots to kill?

No. 3 and 4 had a more cartoon like feel with a ridiculous colour palette. 2's was superior.

I liked 2 the most, but it's pretty flawed
3 is decent with mods that remove the story and some other shit, I used Ziggys mod
Haven't played 4 yet, seems like more of the same

I really dug 3. Drug fueled descent in to violent madness was fun.

2 was shit only because of the VA. Maybe it would have been playable otherwise. Oh and that ugly fucking kike

Far Cry 2 is objectively one of the best games every made. The unity of the narrative themes and the way the game plays is sublime.

1 by far

blood dragon 2 when?

>not one mention of Instincts
Mapmaker was GOAT

This one.

I believe a console version got released in Europe.

Anyone played the various version of the original Farcry on consoles?

I believe they shared the assets of the original, but had their own story line.

I don't know who they got to voice that shit but it's a very familiar voice and it annoys the living shit out of me.

Far Cry 3 should have ended when you beat Vaas, it's downhill from there.
Also they should have done the same as they did with FC4 and made the wingsuit available early on and not after you're already burnt from playing the game.

...

>. 3 and 4 had a more cartoon like feel with a ridiculous colour palette. 2's was superior
> People are unironically praising the gritty "everything is brown" graphics style
Please no, that was the worst Era for graphics.