Goths

>Goths
>unstoppable armies of Huskarls roam the landscape
>carefully balanced by their utter inability to build walls

Can someone explain that logic to me?

>Playing this instead of AoE 1

AOE2 gets pretty regular expansions, even 20 years on. AOE gets nothing and is far simpler

heresyouryou.com

>Needing to fix the game 20 years later because it's shit

>aoe3 was bad meme

>Byzantines
>all bases covered in the tech tree
>carefully balanced by having a second type of knight that is good against massed pikemen

3's excellent in singleplayer

you got that backward

Don't let them get to that point idiot

singleplayer in excellent 3's?

single player is the worst part of aoe 3
The only good campaign are the asians and they're the shortest

i dont understand calvalry, i just dont. Its so easily trounced by cannon fodder spearman; the only way to lose to a cavalry army is if you just make ranged units.

Support them with Magonel/Scorpions

there is literally zero reason for your cavalry to get caught by spears

How user?
I also need advice

If they can't even build walls and you let them get that far, well...

you run faster

Its like everyone is or much better than me or shit tier

Cavalry outrun spears with ease and spears are a terrible offensive unit so while they do well mixed into other armies they can't take on cavalry armies alone since it's impossible to force a fight with them.

They can't defend easily against rushes because they can only use houses to protect their base
Applying pressure early can knock them off kilter

>Wololo

Can the Huns be stopped

Why are the Malay so busted?

I loved the card / home city system of 3. The cosmetic city customization was pointless, though.

because the two handed swordman shit on every trash unit

>play multiplayer with friends
>play as the mongols
>everyone hates me because large armies of mangudai are unstoppable